• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二线表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR TKIs)序贯三线培美曲塞或相反给药顺序治疗晚期肺腺癌的疗效比较

[Comparison of the efficacy of second line EGFR TKIs followed by third line pemetrexed or the reverse sequence in the treatment of advanced lung adenocarcinoma].

作者信息

Zhang Ru-Xia, Cai Dong-Yan, Hong Ting-Ting, Wu Xiao-Hong, Hua Dong

机构信息

The Forth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 214062, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2012 Feb;34(2):147-51. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2012.02.015.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2012.02.015
PMID:22780936
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of second-line EGFR-TKIs followed by third-line pemetrexed with second-line pemetrexed followed by third-line EGFR-TKIs in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

From March 2007 to August 2008, 83 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who failed standard first-line chemotherapy were included in this study. The patients who received EGFR-TKIs as second-line therapy followed by third-line pemetrexed were designated as group A (n = 45). The patients who received pemetrexed as second-line therapy followed by third-line EGFR-TKIs were designated as group B (n = 38). PFS and MST were estimated with Kaplan-Meier analysis and the difference between groups were compared with Log-rank test.

RESULTS

The progression-free survival (PFS) after second-line therapy in the groups A and B was 8.05 months (95% CI, 5.90 to 10.20) and 4.20 months (95% CI, 3.33 to 5.06), respectively (P = 0.001). The PFS after second-line therapy in smokers and non-smokers was 3.69 months (95% CI, 5.00 to 7.59) and 7.12 months (95% CI, 5.51 to 8.38), respectively (P = 0.007). The PFS of male and female patients was 5.56 months (95% CI, 4.02 to 7.10) and 6.85 months (95% CI, 4.98 to 7.58), respectively (P = 0.279). The PFS after third-line therapy in groups A and B was 6.88 months (95% CI, 5.07 to 8.69) and 7.60 months (95% CI, 5.59 to 9.12) respectively, (P = 0.899). The PFS after third-line therapy in smokers and non-smokers was 4.95 months (95% CI, 2.83 to 7.05) and 8.49 months (95% CI, 6.27 to 10.76), respectively (P = 0.050). The PFS after third-line therapy in male and female patients was 5. 96 months (95% CI, 4.02 to 7.91) amd 8.38 months (95% CI, 5.68 to 11.07), respectively (P = 0.176). The MST in groups A and B was 23.60 months (95% CI, 19.23 to 28.00) and 15.58 months (95% CI, 11.85 to 19.32), respectively (P = 0.021). The MST in smokers and non-smokers was 11.99 months (95% CI, 8.55 to 15.49) and 23.18 months (95% CI, 19.33 to 27.02), respectively (P = 0.001). The MST in male and female patients was 17.40 months (95% CI, 13. 19 to 21.61) and 22.74 months (95% CI, 18.29 to 27.19), respectively (P = 0.111).

CONCLUSIONS

Second line EGFR TKIs followed by third line pemetrexed regimen improves the PFS and MST compared with the regimen second line pemetrexed followed by third line EGFR TKIs in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Smoking status is an independent prognostic factor. Survival is not influenced by gender. Prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings.

摘要

目的

比较晚期肺腺癌患者二线使用表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKIs)后三线使用培美曲塞与二线使用培美曲塞后三线使用EGFR-TKIs的疗效。

方法

2007年3月至2008年8月,83例一线标准化疗失败的晚期肺腺癌患者纳入本研究。接受EGFR-TKIs作为二线治疗后三线使用培美曲塞的患者被指定为A组(n = 45)。接受培美曲塞作为二线治疗后三线使用EGFR-TKIs的患者被指定为B组(n = 38)。采用Kaplan-Meier分析估计无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(MST),并采用对数秩检验比较组间差异。

结果

A组和B组二线治疗后的无进展生存期分别为8.05个月(95%可信区间,5.90至10.20)和4.20个月(95%可信区间,3.33至5.06)(P = 0.001)。吸烟者和非吸烟者二线治疗后的PFS分别为3.69个月(95%可信区间,5.00至7.59)和7.12个月(95%可信区间,5.51至8.38)(P = 0.007)。男性和女性患者的PFS分别为5.56个月(95%可信区间,4.02至7.10)和6.85个月(95%可信区间,4.98至7.58)(P = 0.279)。A组和B组三线治疗后的PFS分别为6.88个月(95%可信区间,5.07至8.69)和7.60个月(95%可信区间,5.59至9.12),(P = 0.899)。吸烟者和非吸烟者三线治疗后的PFS分别为4.95个月(95%可信区间,2.83至7.05)和8.49个月(95%可信区间,6.27至10.76)(P = 0.050)。男性和女性患者三线治疗后的PFS分别为5.96个月(95%可信区间,4.02至7.91)和8.38个月(95%可信区间,5.68至11.07)(P = 0.176)。A组和B组的MST分别为23.60个月(95%可信区间,19.23至28.00)和15.58个月(95%可信区间,11.85至19.32)(P = 0.02)。吸烟者和非吸烟者的MST分别为11.99个月(95%可信区间,8.55至15.49)和23.18个月(95%可信区间,19.33至27.02)(P = 0.001)。男性和女性患者的MST分别为17.40个月(95%可信区间,13.19至21.61)和22.74个月(95%可信区间,18.29至27.19)(P = 0.111)。

结论

与晚期肺腺癌患者二线使用培美曲塞后三线使用EGFR-TKIs的方案相比,二线使用EGFR-TKIs后三线使用培美曲塞的方案可改善PFS和MST。吸烟状态是一个独立的预后因素。生存不受性别影响。需要进行前瞻性临床试验来证实这些发现。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of the efficacy of second line EGFR TKIs followed by third line pemetrexed or the reverse sequence in the treatment of advanced lung adenocarcinoma].二线表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR TKIs)序贯三线培美曲塞或相反给药顺序治疗晚期肺腺癌的疗效比较
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2012 Feb;34(2):147-51. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2012.02.015.
2
[Efficacy and safety of docetaxol, pemetrexed and EGFR-TKIs as second-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer].多西他赛、培美曲塞及表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂作为晚期非小细胞肺癌患者二线治疗的疗效与安全性
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2012 Nov;34(11):869-72. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2012.11.016.
3
A randomized phase 2 trial of erlotinib versus pemetrexed as second-line therapy in the treatment of patients with advanced EGFR wild-type and EGFR FISH-positive lung adenocarcinoma.一项厄洛替尼对比培美曲塞作为二线治疗用于治疗晚期 EGFR 野生型和 EGFR FISH 阳性肺腺癌患者的随机 2 期临床试验。
Cancer. 2014 May 1;120(9):1379-86. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28591. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
4
Sequential treatment of advanced-stage lung adenocarcinoma harboring wild-type EGFR gene: second-line pemetrexed followed by third-line erlotinib versus the reverse sequence.晚期 EGFR 基因野生型肺腺癌的序贯治疗:培美曲塞二线治疗后序贯厄洛替尼三线治疗与反序治疗的比较。
Anticancer Res. 2013 Aug;33(8):3397-402.
5
[Efficacy of chemotherapy after EGFR-TKIs resistance in 191 patients with Unknow EGFR gene mutation in advanced lung adenocarcinoma].[191例未知表皮生长因子受体基因突变的晚期肺腺癌患者表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂耐药后化疗的疗效]
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2013 Oct 20;16(10):529-34. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2013.10.06.
6
Second-line epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors followed by third-line pemetrexed or the reverse sequence: a retrospective analysis of 83 Chinese patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma.二线表皮生长因子受体抑制剂序贯三线培美曲塞或反序治疗:83 例晚期肺腺癌患者的回顾性分析。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2012 Feb;138(2):285-91. doi: 10.1007/s00432-011-1084-z. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
7
The salvage therapy in lung adenocarcinoma initially harbored susceptible EGFR mutation and acquired resistance occurred to the first-line gefitinib and second-line cytotoxic chemotherapy.肺腺癌初始携带有敏感 EGFR 突变,一线吉非替尼和二线细胞毒化疗获得性耐药。
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2017 May 10;18(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40360-017-0130-0.
8
Impact of cigarette smoking on response to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in lung adenocarcinoma with activating EGFR mutations.吸烟对携带激活型表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的肺腺癌患者表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)-酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗反应的影响。
Lung Cancer. 2014 May;84(2):196-202. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.01.022. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
9
Gefitinib versus pemetrexed as second-line treatment in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy (KCSG-LU08-01): an open-label, phase 3 trial.吉非替尼对比培美曲塞作为含铂化疗后进展的非小细胞肺癌患者的二线治疗(KCSG-LU08-01):一项开放标签、III 期临床试验。
Cancer. 2012 Dec 15;118(24):6234-42. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27630. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
10
Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Gefitinib With Erlotinib in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma: WJOG 5108L.曾接受治疗的晚期肺腺癌患者中吉非替尼对比厄洛替尼的随机 III 期研究:WJOG5108L
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 20;34(27):3248-57. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.4154. Epub 2016 Mar 28.