• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注射器填充的自动化方法与手动方法的比较。

Comparison of automated and manual methods of syringe filling.

作者信息

Achusim L E, Woller T W, Somani S M, Abramowitz P W

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Services, Santa Rosa Hospital, San Antonio, TX 78207-3108.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990 Nov;47(11):2492-5.

PMID:2278261
Abstract

A study to measure the time and cost associated with an automated and a manual method of syringe filling is reported. A stopwatch was used to measure the time needed by an experienced pharmacy technician to prepare batches of 200 syringes of each of seven drugs by a manual method and an automated method, the Multi-Ad Fluid Dispensing System. For each drug and method, time-and-motion data were collected during the preparation of four batches. The accuracy of each method was determined by dividing the actual by the expected number of syringes filled per batch. Material costs were calculated by summing the contract costs of the necessary equipment. The total cost of each method was determined by adding the labor and material costs. For all the drugs, the mean total time required to prepare one batch of syringes by the automated method was significantly less than that for the manual method. There was no significant difference in accuracy between methods for any of the drugs. The annual labor costs of the automated and manual methods were $4056 and $5761, respectively, and the annual material costs were $3364 and $2260, respectively. The total annual cost of the automated method was $7419, compared with $8021 for the manual method. The Multi-Ad system was significantly faster and somewhat less costly overall than a manual method for batch preparation of syringes of seven drugs.

摘要

本文报道了一项关于测量自动和手动注射器填充方法的时间及成本的研究。使用秒表来测量一位经验丰富的药剂师分别通过手动方法和自动方法(Multi-Ad流体分配系统)制备七类药物各200支注射器批次所需的时间。对于每种药物和方法,在制备四批次的过程中收集了时间和动作数据。通过将每批次实际填充的注射器数量除以预期数量来确定每种方法的准确性。材料成本通过将所需设备的合同成本相加来计算。每种方法的总成本通过将人工成本和材料成本相加来确定。对于所有药物,通过自动方法制备一批注射器所需的平均总时间显著少于手动方法。对于任何一种药物,不同方法之间的准确性没有显著差异。自动和手动方法的年度人工成本分别为4056美元和5761美元,年度材料成本分别为3364美元和2260美元。自动方法的年度总成本为7419美元,而手动方法为8021美元。对于七类药物的注射器批量制备,Multi-Ad系统总体上明显更快且成本略低。

相似文献

1
Comparison of automated and manual methods of syringe filling.注射器填充的自动化方法与手动方法的比较。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990 Nov;47(11):2492-5.
2
Medication cart-filling time, accuracy, and cost with an automated dispensing system.自动配药系统的药车装填时间、准确性及成本
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1994 May 1;51(9):1193-6.
3
Cost comparison of two systems for intermittent intravenous administration of small-volume injections.两种小容量注射剂间歇性静脉给药系统的成本比较
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1985 Feb;42(2):323-8.
4
Implementation and cost analysis of a syringe pump system for intermittent i.v. drug delivery.间歇性静脉给药注射器泵系统的实施与成本分析
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1985 Mar;42(3):581-4.
5
Comparison of seven methods of preparing and administering cefazolin sodium small-volume injections.头孢唑林钠小容量注射剂七种制备与给药方法的比较
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1986 Aug;43(8):1930-5.
6
Evaluation of the Drug-O-Matic automated dispensing system.Drug-O-Matic自动配药系统的评估
J Pharm Technol. 1993 Mar-Apr;9(2):47-8.
7
Cost analysis of using premixed frozen versus hospital-reconstituted cefazolin sodium injection.预混冷冻型与医院复溶型头孢唑林钠注射液使用的成本分析
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1987 Apr;44(4):783-7.
8
Comparison of six methods for preparing cefazolin sodium for intermittent injection.
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1983 Oct;40(10):1653-8.
9
Time and cost comparison of four methods of filling drug manufacturers' piggyback bottles.
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1985 May;42(5):1083-6.
10
Personnel costs and preparation time in a centralized intravenous admixture program.集中式静脉药物配置项目中的人员成本和准备时间。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1986 May;43(5):1222-5.