• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of dengue-related health information on the internet.互联网上登革热相关健康信息的评估。
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2012;9(Summer):1c. Epub 2012 Apr 1.
2
Assessment of the malnutrition related information on the internet.互联网上与营养不良相关信息的评估。
Technol Health Care. 2012;20(2):117-25. doi: 10.3233/THC-2011-0658.
3
Quality of Novel Coronavirus Related Health Information over the Internet: An Evaluation Study.互联网上新型冠状病毒相关健康信息的质量:一项评估研究。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2020 Aug 6;2020:1562028. doi: 10.1155/2020/1562028. eCollection 2020.
4
Quality of nutrition related information on the internet for osteoporosis patients: a critical review.互联网上骨质疏松症患者营养相关信息的质量:一项批判性综述。
Technol Health Care. 2011;19(6):391-400. doi: 10.3233/THC-2011-0643.
5
The quality of Internet information on lingual orthodontics in the English language, with DISCERN and JAMA.利用DISCERN和《美国医学会杂志》评估英文网络上舌侧正畸信息的质量。
J Orthod. 2019 Mar;46(1):20-26. doi: 10.1177/1465312518824100. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
6
Using Internet search engines to obtain medical information: a comparative study.利用互联网搜索引擎获取医学信息:一项对比研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2012 May 16;14(3):e74. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1943.
7
Quality of diabetes related health information on internet: an Indian context.互联网上糖尿病相关健康信息的质量:印度背景下的情况
Int J Electron Healthc. 2013;7(3):205-20. doi: 10.1504/IJEH.2013.057408.
8
Orthognathic surgery: is patient information on the Internet valid?正颌外科:互联网上的患者信息是否有效?
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Aug;34(4):466-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr046. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
9
Cross sectional analysis of scoliosis-specific information on the internet: potential for patient confusion and misinformation.互联网上脊柱侧凸特定信息的横断面分析:可能导致患者困惑和错误信息。
Spine Deform. 2020 Dec;8(6):1159-1167. doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00156-8. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
10
Assessing the quality, reliability and readability of online health information regarding systemic lupus erythematosus.评估关于系统性红斑狼疮的在线健康信息的质量、可靠性和可读性。
Lupus. 2018 Oct;27(12):1911-1917. doi: 10.1177/0961203318793213. Epub 2018 Aug 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Determinants of Infodemics During Disease Outbreaks: A Systematic Review.传染病期间信息疫情的决定因素:系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2021 Mar 29;9:603603. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.603603. eCollection 2021.
2
Disorders of sex development (DSD) web-based information: quality survey of DSD team websites.性发育障碍(DSD)的网络信息:DSD团队网站质量调查
Int J Pediatr Endocrinol. 2019;2019:1. doi: 10.1186/s13633-019-0065-x. Epub 2019 May 28.
3
Evaluating asthma websites using the Brief DISCERN instrument.使用简易DISCERN工具评估哮喘相关网站。
J Asthma Allergy. 2017 Jun 16;10:191-196. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S133536. eCollection 2017.
4
Quality of patient health information on the Internet: reviewing a complex and evolving landscape.互联网上患者健康信息的质量:审视复杂且不断演变的局面。
Australas Med J. 2014 Jan 31;7(1):24-8. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2014.1900. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of nutrition related information on the internet for osteoporosis patients: a critical review.互联网上骨质疏松症患者营养相关信息的质量:一项批判性综述。
Technol Health Care. 2011;19(6):391-400. doi: 10.3233/THC-2011-0643.
2
Health economics of dengue: a systematic literature review and expert panel's assessment.登革热的卫生经济学:系统文献综述与专家小组评估
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011 Mar;84(3):473-88. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0521.
3
Assessment of the quality and variability of health information on chronic pain websites using the DISCERN instrument.使用 DISCERN 工具评估慢性疼痛网站上健康信息的质量和变异性。
BMC Med. 2010 Oct 12;8:59. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-59.
4
Patients' views of a multimedia resource featuring experiences of rheumatoid arthritis: pilot evaluation of www.healthtalkonline.org.患者对呈现类风湿关节炎经历的多媒体资源的看法:对www.healthtalkonline.org的初步评估
Health Informatics J. 2009 Jun;15(2):147-59. doi: 10.1177/1460458209102974.
5
Brief DISCERN, six questions for the evaluation of evidence-based content of health-related websites.简要 DISCERN,用于评估健康相关网站循证内容的六个问题。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Oct;77(1):33-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.02.016. Epub 2009 Apr 15.
6
The delivery of public health interventions via the Internet: actualizing their potential.通过互联网提供公共卫生干预措施:发挥其潜力。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:273-92. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100235.
7
An investigation of the quality of breast cancer information provided on the internet by voluntary organisations in Great Britain.英国志愿组织在互联网上提供的乳腺癌信息质量调查。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Jul;76(1):10-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.019.
8
A study of undue pain and surfing: using hierarchical criteria to assess website quality.一项关于过度疼痛与浏览体验的研究:运用分层标准评估网站质量。
Health Informatics J. 2008 Sep;14(3):155-73. doi: 10.1177/1081180X08092827.
9
Economic burden of dengue infections in India.印度登革热感染的经济负担。
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008 Jun;102(6):570-7. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2008.02.015. Epub 2008 Apr 9.
10
Assessing the quality of websites providing information on multiple sclerosis: evaluating tools and comparing sites.评估提供多发性硬化症信息的网站质量:评估工具与网站比较
Health Informatics J. 2007 Sep;13(3):207-21. doi: 10.1177/1460458207079837.

互联网上登革热相关健康信息的评估。

Evaluation of dengue-related health information on the internet.

作者信息

Rao Navya R, Mohapatra Manaswini, Mishra Swayamprabha, Joshi Ashish

机构信息

Center for Public Health Informatics, Asian Institute of Public Health in Bhuabneswar, India.

出版信息

Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2012;9(Summer):1c. Epub 2012 Apr 1.

PMID:22783151
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3392950/
Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine the quality of dengue-related health information on the Internet. Three raters used the keyword dengue to search the Google, Yahoo!, and Bing search engines during August 2011. The first 20 websites from each search engine were examined for a total of 60 sites. Duplicate, nonfunctional, non-English, and nonoperational websites were excluded from the study, resulting in 36 sites for final analysis. The 16-item DISCERN tool was used to evaluate the quality of dengue-related health information on the Internet. Chi-square analysis and analysis of variance were performed to compare the DISCERN scores. Inter-rater reliability analysis showed significant differences in the level of agreement among the three raters. The 36 unique websites were categorized into .com, .edu, .gov, .org, and other sites. The .com sites had the lowest DISCERN scores. Educating consumers on how to find and recognize valid health information on the Internet may lead to better informed decision making.

摘要

本研究的目的是检验互联网上登革热相关健康信息的质量。2011年8月,三名评估人员使用关键词“登革热”搜索谷歌、雅虎和必应搜索引擎。对每个搜索引擎的前20个网站进行检查,共计60个网站。重复、无法使用、非英文和无法运行的网站被排除在研究之外,最终得到36个网站用于分析。使用16项DISCERN工具评估互联网上登革热相关健康信息的质量。进行卡方分析和方差分析以比较DISCERN分数。评估者间信度分析显示三名评估者之间的一致程度存在显著差异。这36个独特的网站被分类为.com、.edu、.gov、.org和其他网站。.com网站的DISCERN分数最低。指导消费者如何在互联网上查找和识别有效的健康信息可能会使他们做出更明智的决策。