• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

政治成熟度的遗传基础。

The genetic basis of political sophistication.

作者信息

Arceneaux Kevin, Johnson Martine, Maes Hermine H

机构信息

Department of Political Science, Temple University, PA, USA.

出版信息

Twin Res Hum Genet. 2012 Feb;15(1):34-41. doi: 10.1375/twin.15.1.34.

DOI:10.1375/twin.15.1.34
PMID:22784451
Abstract

Political sophistication is a concept that encompasses political reasoning, the coherence of people's issue attitudes, and their knowledge of political processes. To what extent is political sophistication affected by genes and environments? Do these distinct but related measures of sophistication share a common genetic structure? We analyze survey data collected from participants in the Minnesota Twin Registry to estimate influences of genes and environments on variables used to measure political sophistication. Additive genetic factors explain 48-76% of the variation in educational attainment, political interest, and political knowledge, while dominance genetics influence 28% of the variance of ideological consistency. Multivariate analyses show that, although these measures share common genetic and unique environmental factors to a modest extent, much of the variance is explained by specific genetic and unique environmental factors. Ideological consistency appears to be mostly distinct from the other measures, as it is strongly accounted for by unique environmental influences.

摘要

政治成熟度是一个涵盖政治推理、人们议题态度的连贯性以及他们对政治进程的了解的概念。政治成熟度在多大程度上受到基因和环境的影响?这些不同但相关的成熟度衡量指标是否共享一个共同的遗传结构?我们分析了从明尼苏达双胞胎登记处的参与者收集的调查数据,以估计基因和环境对用于衡量政治成熟度的变量的影响。加性遗传因素解释了教育程度、政治兴趣和政治知识变异的48%-76%,而显性遗传影响了意识形态一致性方差的28%。多变量分析表明,尽管这些指标在一定程度上共享共同的遗传和独特环境因素,但大部分方差是由特定的遗传和独特环境因素解释的。意识形态一致性似乎与其他指标大多不同,因为它主要由独特的环境影响所解释。

相似文献

1
The genetic basis of political sophistication.政治成熟度的遗传基础。
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2012 Feb;15(1):34-41. doi: 10.1375/twin.15.1.34.
2
The heritability of foreign policy preferences.外交政策偏好的遗传力。
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2012 Feb;15(1):52-9. doi: 10.1375/twin.15.1.52.
3
Nature, nurture, and ethnocentrism in the Minnesota twin study.明尼苏达双胞胎研究中的天性、教养与民族中心主义。
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2012 Feb;15(1):71-3. doi: 10.1375/twin.15.1.71.
4
Heritability in political interest and efficacy across cultures: Denmark and the United States.跨文化背景下政治兴趣与效能的遗传力:丹麦与美国
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2012 Feb;15(1):15-20. doi: 10.1375/twin.15.1.15.
5
Rethinking twins and environments: possible social sources for assumed genetic influences in twin research.重新审视双胞胎与环境:双胞胎研究中假定基因影响的可能社会根源
J Health Soc Behav. 2003 Jun;44(2):111-29.
6
Integrating classical and contemporary explanations of political participation.整合对政治参与的经典解释与当代解释。
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2012 Feb;15(1):42-51. doi: 10.1375/twin.15.1.42.
7
The Danish political twin study: political traits in Danish twins and the general population.丹麦政治双胞胎研究:丹麦双胞胎及普通人群的政治特质
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2012 Feb;15(1):74-8. doi: 10.1375/twin.15.1.74.
8
The role of educational attainment in refraction: the Genes in Myopia (GEM) twin study.教育程度在屈光方面的作用:近视基因(GEM)双胞胎研究。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Feb;49(2):534-8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1123.
9
The structure of genetic and environmental risk factors for anxiety disorders in men and women.男性和女性焦虑症的遗传和环境风险因素结构。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Feb;62(2):182-9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.2.182.
10
Do heritability estimates of political phenotypes suffer from an equal environment assumption violation? Evidence from an empirical study.政治表型的遗传力估计是否存在违反等环境假设的问题?一项实证研究的证据。
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2012 Feb;15(1):6-14. doi: 10.1375/twin.15.1.6.

引用本文的文献

1
An Experimental Examination of Demand-Side Preferences for Female and Male National Leaders.对女性和男性国家领导人需求方偏好的实验性考察。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 15;11:576278. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.576278. eCollection 2020.