• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外交政策偏好的遗传力。

The heritability of foreign policy preferences.

作者信息

Cranmer Skyler J, Dawes Christopher T

机构信息

Department of Political Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3265, USA.

出版信息

Twin Res Hum Genet. 2012 Feb;15(1):52-9. doi: 10.1375/twin.15.1.52.

DOI:10.1375/twin.15.1.52
PMID:22784453
Abstract

Attitudes towards foreign policy have typically been explained by ideological and demographic factors. We approach this study from a different perspective and ex amine the extent to which foreign policy preferences correspond to genetic variation. Using data from the Minnesota Twin Family Study, we show that a moderate share of individual differences in the degree to which one's foreign policy preferences are hawkish or dovish can be attributed to genetic variation. We also show, based on a bivariate twin model, that foreign policy preferences share a common genetic source of variation with political ideology. This result presents the possibility that ideology may be the causal pathway through which genes affect foreign policy preferences.

摘要

对外交政策的态度通常由意识形态和人口统计学因素来解释。我们从不同的角度进行这项研究,考察外交政策偏好与基因变异的对应程度。利用明尼苏达双胞胎家庭研究的数据,我们发现,个人在外交政策偏好的鹰派或鸽派程度上的差异,有相当一部分可归因于基因变异。我们还基于双变量双胞胎模型表明,外交政策偏好与政治意识形态有共同的基因变异来源。这一结果表明,意识形态可能是基因影响外交政策偏好的因果途径。

相似文献

1
The heritability of foreign policy preferences.外交政策偏好的遗传力。
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2012 Feb;15(1):52-9. doi: 10.1375/twin.15.1.52.
2
The genetic basis of political sophistication.政治成熟度的遗传基础。
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2012 Feb;15(1):34-41. doi: 10.1375/twin.15.1.34.
3
Nature, nurture, and ethnocentrism in the Minnesota twin study.明尼苏达双胞胎研究中的天性、教养与民族中心主义。
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2012 Feb;15(1):71-3. doi: 10.1375/twin.15.1.71.
4
Heritability in political interest and efficacy across cultures: Denmark and the United States.跨文化背景下政治兴趣与效能的遗传力:丹麦与美国
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2012 Feb;15(1):15-20. doi: 10.1375/twin.15.1.15.
5
Fear and attitudes towards torture and preventive war.对酷刑和预防性战争的恐惧及态度。
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2012 Feb;15(1):60-70. doi: 10.1375/twin.15.1.60.
6
The Danish political twin study: political traits in Danish twins and the general population.丹麦政治双胞胎研究:丹麦双胞胎及普通人群的政治特质
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2012 Feb;15(1):74-8. doi: 10.1375/twin.15.1.74.
7
Rethinking twins and environments: possible social sources for assumed genetic influences in twin research.重新审视双胞胎与环境:双胞胎研究中假定基因影响的可能社会根源
J Health Soc Behav. 2003 Jun;44(2):111-29.
8
Heritability of life satisfaction in adults: a twin-family study.成年人生活满意度的遗传力:一项双生子-家庭研究。
Psychol Med. 2005 Nov;35(11):1581-8. doi: 10.1017/S0033291705005374.
9
Do heritability estimates of political phenotypes suffer from an equal environment assumption violation? Evidence from an empirical study.政治表型的遗传力估计是否存在违反等环境假设的问题?一项实证研究的证据。
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2012 Feb;15(1):6-14. doi: 10.1375/twin.15.1.6.
10
Integrating classical and contemporary explanations of political participation.整合对政治参与的经典解释与当代解释。
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2012 Feb;15(1):42-51. doi: 10.1375/twin.15.1.42.

引用本文的文献

1
It Runs in the Family: A Study of Political Candidacy Among Swedish Adoptees.家族遗传:瑞典领养者政治候选人资格研究
Polit Behav. 2018;40(4):883-908. doi: 10.1007/s11109-017-9429-1. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
2
The Influence of Major Life Events on Economic Attitudes in a World of Gene-Environment Interplay.在基因与环境相互作用的世界中重大生活事件对经济态度的影响
Am J Pol Sci. 2013 Oct 1;57(4):987-1007. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12037.
3
Genetic influences on political ideologies: twin analyses of 19 measures of political ideologies from five democracies and genome-wide findings from three populations.
基因对政治意识形态的影响:来自五个民主国家的19项政治意识形态指标的双胞胎分析以及来自三个人群的全基因组研究结果
Behav Genet. 2014 May;44(3):282-94. doi: 10.1007/s10519-014-9648-8. Epub 2014 Feb 26.