Parrino T A, White A T
Evans Department of Clinical Research, Boston University School of Medicine, Massachusetts.
Am J Med. 1990 Oct;89(4):491-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(90)90381-m.
Medical grand rounds is a time-honored weekly conference at United States teaching hospitals. We surveyed 122 departments of medicine to test the hypothesis that grand rounds may have changed with the changing training environment. Our goal was to gain a new perspective on the way physicians learn clinical medicine and maintain their fund of information. A questionnaire was designed to assess several aspects of grand rounds, including format, objectives, popularity, and changes over time. The questionnaire was directed to department heads of 122 U.S. medical schools. Seventy-five percent of respondents were department chairs; the remainder were chief residents and other faculty. Survey response rate was 96%. According to respondents, the major objective of grand rounds was to provide "updates in diagnosis and treatment." Case presentations were regularly included in about one third of departments; patients were rarely present for examination or interview. The popularity of grand rounds was thought to have decreased. These data support the impression that medical grand rounds is still considered important in most academic medical centers. Suggestions are made for increasing the clinical relevance of the conference. New techniques for presenting clinical material are reviewed, and an argument is made for returning to a basic strategy of "solving the patient's problem."
医学大查房是美国教学医院每周都会举行的一项历史悠久的会议。我们调查了122个医学系,以检验大查房可能随着培训环境的变化而改变这一假设。我们的目标是从医生学习临床医学和维持其信息储备的方式中获得新的视角。设计了一份问卷来评估大查房的几个方面,包括形式、目标、受欢迎程度以及随时间的变化。该问卷针对122所美国医学院的系主任。75%的受访者是系主任;其余的是总住院医师和其他教员。调查回复率为96%。根据受访者的说法,大查房的主要目标是提供“诊断和治疗的最新信息”。约三分之一的科室经常进行病例汇报;很少有患者到场接受检查或访谈。大查房的受欢迎程度被认为有所下降。这些数据支持了这样一种印象,即在大多数学术医学中心,医学大查房仍然被认为很重要。文中提出了提高会议临床相关性的建议。回顾了展示临床资料的新技术,并主张回归到“解决患者问题”的基本策略。