Suppr超能文献

腹主动脉手术中硬膜外镇痛与基于全身性阿片类药物的镇痛效果比较

Epidural pain relief versus systemic opioid-based pain relief for abdominal aortic surgery.

作者信息

Nishimori Mina, Low James H S, Zheng Hui, Ballantyne Jane C

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo,

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11(7):CD005059. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005059.pub3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Epidural analgesia offers greater pain relief compared to systemic opioid-based medications, but its effect on morbidity and mortality is unclear. This review was originally published in 2006 and was updated in 2011.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of postoperative epidural analgesia in comparison with postoperative systemic opioid-based pain relief for adult patients who underwent elective abdominal aortic surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 11) via Ovid; Ovid MEDLINE (from inception to week 1 November 2010); and EMBASE (from inception to week 1, November 2010). The original search was performed in 2004. We assessed non-English language reports and contacted researchers in the field. We did not seek unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing postoperative epidural analgesia and postoperative systemic opioid-based analgesia for adult patients who underwent elective open abdominal aortic surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information and data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 15 trials that involved 1297 patients (633 patients received epidural analgesia and 664 received systemic opioid analgesia) in this review. This included one trial we found in our updated search and one trial from our original review that had been awaiting translation. The epidural analgesia group showed significantly lower visual analogue scale scores for pain on movement (up to postoperative day three) regardless of the site of the epidural catheter and epidural formulation. The postoperative duration of tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation was significantly shorter, by about 48%, in the epidural analgesia group. The overall event rates of myocardial infarction, acute respiratory failure (defined as an extended need for mechanical ventilation), gastrointestinal complications, and renal complications were significantly lower in the epidural analgesia group.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Epidural analgesia provides better pain relief (especially during movement) in the period up to three postoperative days. It reduces the duration of postoperative tracheal intubation by roughly half. The occurrence of prolonged postoperative mechanical ventilation, myocardial infarction, gastric complications and renal complications was reduced by epidural analgesia. However, current evidence does not confirm the beneficial effect of epidural analgesia on postoperative mortality and other types of complications.

摘要

背景

与基于全身性阿片类药物的治疗相比,硬膜外镇痛能提供更好的疼痛缓解效果,但它对发病率和死亡率的影响尚不清楚。本综述最初发表于2006年,并于2011年更新。

目的

评估接受择期腹主动脉手术的成年患者术后硬膜外镇痛与术后基于全身性阿片类药物的疼痛缓解相比的益处和危害。

检索方法

我们通过Ovid检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(《Cochrane图书馆》2010年第11期);Ovid MEDLINE(从创刊至2010年11月第1周);以及EMBASE(从创刊至2010年11月第1周)。最初的检索于2004年进行。我们评估了非英语语言报告,并联系了该领域的研究人员。我们未寻求未发表的数据。

入选标准

我们纳入了所有比较接受择期开放性腹主动脉手术的成年患者术后硬膜外镇痛和术后基于全身性阿片类药物的镇痛的随机和半随机对照试验。

数据收集与分析

两位作者独立评估试验质量并提取数据。我们联系研究作者以获取更多信息和数据。

主要结果

本综述纳入了15项试验,涉及1297例患者(633例接受硬膜外镇痛,664例接受全身性阿片类镇痛)。这包括我们在更新检索中找到的一项试验以及我们原始综述中一项等待翻译的试验。无论硬膜外导管位置和硬膜外配方如何,硬膜外镇痛组在运动时的视觉模拟评分疼痛显著更低(直至术后第3天)。硬膜外镇痛组术后气管插管和机械通气的持续时间显著缩短,缩短约48%。硬膜外镇痛组心肌梗死、急性呼吸衰竭(定义为对机械通气的长期需求)、胃肠道并发症和肾脏并发症的总体发生率显著更低。

作者结论

硬膜外镇痛在术后三天内提供更好的疼痛缓解(尤其是在运动期间)。它将术后气管插管的持续时间缩短约一半。硬膜外镇痛降低了术后长期机械通气、心肌梗死、胃部并发症和肾脏并发症的发生率。然而,目前的证据并未证实硬膜外镇痛对术后死亡率和其他类型并发症的有益作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验