• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

FS-LASIK、OUP-SBK 与传统 LASIK 术后角膜神经再生和角膜细胞反应的共焦比较。

Confocal comparison of corneal nerve regeneration and keratocyte reaction between FS-LASIK, OUP-SBK, and conventional LASIK.

机构信息

Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Aug 15;53(9):5536-44. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8786.

DOI:10.1167/iovs.11-8786
PMID:22786909
Abstract

PURPOSE

We compared the regeneration characteristics of injured corneal subbasal nerve fibers (CSNFs) and keratocyte reaction following LASIK with a femtosecond laser (FS-LASIK), One Use-Plus Sub-Bowman's keratomileusis (OUP-SBK), and M2 90 microkeratome to provide a more suitable treatment strategy.

METHODS

A total of 22 eyes that underwent FS-LASIK, 32 eyes that underwent OUP-SBK, and 26 eyes that underwent conventional LASIK were analyzed by confocal microscopy. Morphologic modifications of corneal architecture were evaluated postsurgically at 1, 3, and 6 months, and comparisons were made by ANOVA analysis.

RESULTS

The density of stromal keratocytes in the FS-LASIK group was higher than that of OUP-SBK and conventional LASIK groups at 1 month postsurgery (P < 0.05), while in the OUP-SBK group it was higher than that of the FS-LASIK and conventional LASIK groups at 3 months postsurgery (P < 0.05). Regeneration of CSNFs was detected in 90% of eyes in all three groups around 3 mm of the peripheral flap at 1 month postoperation. CSNFs in 6.3% of the eyes in the OUP-SBK group were even observed around the peripheral flap at 6 mm 3 months after surgery, CSNFs were found in 62.5% of eyes (conventional LASIK), 72% of eyes (OUP-SBK), and 64.3% of eyes (FS-LASIK) around 3 mm near the center of the flap. While at 6 months, CSNFs were found in 100% of the eyes in all three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Keratocyte reactions after FS-LASIK and OUP-SBK were a little more severe than that after conventional LASIK. The repairing velocity of subbasal nerve fibers in the OUP-SBK group was a little faster than that of the FS and conventional LASIK groups.

摘要

目的

我们比较了飞秒激光辅助 LASIK(FS-LASIK)、One Use-Plus 亚氏角膜磨镶术(OUP-SBK)和 M2 90 微型角膜刀治疗后角膜基质下神经纤维(CSNF)的再生特征和角膜细胞反应,以期提供更合适的治疗策略。

方法

通过共聚焦显微镜分析了 22 只接受 FS-LASIK 手术、32 只接受 OUP-SBK 手术和 26 只接受常规 LASIK 手术的眼。术后 1、3 和 6 个月评估角膜结构形态学变化,采用方差分析进行比较。

结果

FS-LASIK 组术后 1 个月基质角膜细胞密度高于 OUP-SBK 组和常规 LASIK 组(P < 0.05),OUP-SBK 组术后 3 个月高于 FS-LASIK 组和常规 LASIK 组(P < 0.05)。术后 1 个月,所有三组在周边瓣周围 3mm 处均检测到 CSNF 再生,约 90%的眼。术后 3 个月,OUP-SBK 组有 6.3%的眼甚至在周边瓣 6mm 处观察到 CSNF,而 FS-LASIK 组有 62.5%的眼(常规 LASIK)、72%的眼(OUP-SBK)和 64.3%的眼(FS-LASIK)在瓣中心附近 3mm 处观察到 CSNF。术后 6 个月,三组所有眼均可见 CSNF。

结论

FS-LASIK 和 OUP-SBK 术后角膜细胞反应比常规 LASIK 稍重。OUP-SBK 组 CSNF 的修复速度比 FS 和常规 LASIK 组稍快。

相似文献

1
Confocal comparison of corneal nerve regeneration and keratocyte reaction between FS-LASIK, OUP-SBK, and conventional LASIK.FS-LASIK、OUP-SBK 与传统 LASIK 术后角膜神经再生和角膜细胞反应的共焦比较。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Aug 15;53(9):5536-44. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8786.
2
Comparison of corneal nerve regeneration and sensitivity between LASIK and laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK).准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)与准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)角膜神经再生及敏感性的比较。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Jun;141(6):1009-1015. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.01.048.
3
Fellow Eye Comparison of Nerve Fiber Regeneration After SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK: A Confocal Microscopy Study.微笑模式(SMILE)与飞秒激光辅助准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)后神经纤维再生的眼内比较:一项共聚焦显微镜研究
J Refract Surg. 2015 Sep;31(9):594-8. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20150820-04.
4
A prospective, contralateral eye study comparing thin-flap LASIK (sub-Bowman keratomileusis) with photorefractive keratectomy.一项前瞻性对侧眼研究,比较薄瓣准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(角膜基质下准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术)与准分子激光角膜切削术。
Ophthalmology. 2009 Jun;116(6):1075-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.01.001.
5
[Safety of the automated microkeratome for Sub-Bowman's Keratomileusis on the flat cornea].[自动微型角膜刀在扁平角膜上进行角膜基质层下准分子原位角膜磨镶术的安全性]
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2016 Feb;39(2):202-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2015.07.004. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
6
Corneal recovery after lasik for high myopia: a 2-year prospective confocal microscopic study.高度近视准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后角膜恢复:一项为期2年的前瞻性共焦显微镜研究
Br J Ophthalmol. 2008 Oct;92(10):1397-402. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.126821. Epub 2008 Jul 23.
7
Subbasal nerve fiber regeneration after LASIK and LASEK assessed by noncontact esthesiometry and in vivo confocal microscopy: prospective study.通过非接触式感觉测量法和体内共聚焦显微镜评估准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)和准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)后基底神经纤维再生:前瞻性研究。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Sep;33(9):1515-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.05.023.
8
[Corneal subbasal nerve density changes after laser in situ keratomileusis with mechanical microkeratome and femtosecond laser].[机械微型角膜刀和飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术后角膜基质层下神经密度变化]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Jan;51(1):39-44.
9
Reinnervation in the cornea after LASIK.准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后角膜的神经再支配
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002 Dec;43(12):3660-4.
10
[The effects of protein-free calf blood extract for recovery of corneal nerve after LASEK and LASIK].[无蛋白小牛血提取物对LASEK和LASIK术后角膜神经恢复的影响]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Jun;47(6):539-45.

引用本文的文献

1
Corneal subbasal nerve plexus reinnervation and stromal cell morphology with different cap thicknesses in small incision lenticule extraction.小切口透镜切除术不同帽厚度下的角膜基质下神经丛再支配和基质细胞形态
Eye Vis (Lond). 2024 Apr 8;11(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40662-024-00381-6.
2
Update on Corneal Confocal Microscopy Imaging.角膜共焦显微镜成像的最新进展
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Dec 23;13(1):46. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13010046.
3
Lipidomics Analysis of the Tears in the Patients Receiving LASIK, FS-LASIK, or SBK Surgery.接受准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)、飞秒激光制瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)或前弹力层下准分子激光角膜磨镶术(SBK)手术患者泪液的脂质组学分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Oct 27;8:731462. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.731462. eCollection 2021.
4
Comparative analysis of the clinical outcomes between wavefront-guided and conventional femtosecond LASIK in myopia and myopia astigmatism.波前引导与传统飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视及近视散光的临床疗效对比分析
Int J Ophthalmol. 2021 Oct 18;14(10):1581-1588. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2021.10.16. eCollection 2021.
5
Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a mechanical microkeratome compared to LASIK with a femtosecond laser for LASIK in adults with myopia or myopic astigmatism.与使用飞秒激光进行准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)相比,使用机械微型角膜刀进行的成人近视或近视散光准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 7;4(4):CD012946. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012946.pub2.
6
Assessments of tear meniscus height, tear film thickness, and corneal epithelial thickness after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.深层板层角膜移植术后泪膜半月板高度、泪膜厚度和角膜上皮厚度的评估。
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2018;19(3):218-226. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1700095.
7
In vivo confocal laser microscopy of morphologic changes after small incision lenticule extraction with accelerated cross-linking (SMILE Xtra) in patients with thin corneas and high myopia.薄角膜高度近视患者行加速交联小切口透镜切除术(SMILE Xtra)后形态学改变的体内共焦激光显微镜检查
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan;256(1):199-207. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3811-x. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
8
In Vivo Confocal Microscopy of Corneal Nerves in Health and Disease.活体共聚焦显微镜在健康与疾病中的角膜神经评估
Ocul Surf. 2017 Jan;15(1):15-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
9
Central corneal sensitivity after small incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.小切口透镜切除术与飞秒激光辅助LASIK治疗近视后的中央角膜敏感性:一项比较研究的荟萃分析
BMC Ophthalmol. 2015 Oct 24;15:141. doi: 10.1186/s12886-015-0129-5.
10
Corneal regeneration after femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction: a prospective study.飞秒激光小切口基质透镜切除术术后角膜再生:一项前瞻性研究。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul;253(7):1035-42. doi: 10.1007/s00417-015-2971-9. Epub 2015 Mar 7.