• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[机械微型角膜刀和飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术后角膜基质层下神经密度变化]

[Corneal subbasal nerve density changes after laser in situ keratomileusis with mechanical microkeratome and femtosecond laser].

作者信息

Hu Liang, Xie Wenjia, Tang Lei, Chen Jia, Zhang Dong, Yu Peng, Qu Jia

机构信息

School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China.

Email:

出版信息

Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Jan;51(1):39-44.

PMID:25877709
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the corneal subbasal nerve density (SND) changes after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a microkeratome and a femtosecond laser.

METHODS

Prospective clinical study. Sixty eyes of thirty myopes were included. Fifteen patients (30 eyes) underwent LASIK with the Moria II microkeratome, and the other 15 patients (30 eyes) with the 60 k Hz IntraLase femtosecond laser. Central, temporal and nasal corneal SNDs were measured by confocal microscopy and compared before surgery, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery. Analysis of variance and t test were used for comparing the differences between different time points and two groups.

RESULTS

Preoperatively and 1 month, 3 months postoperatively, the SNDs were (16 728.30 ± 4 300.30), (1 875.42 ± 300.50) and (1 701.55 ± 194.11) µm/mm(2) in the central cornea, (11 379.70 ± 1 833.92), (1 341.20 ± 288.68) and (1 860.87 ± 147.60) µm/mm(2) in the temporal cornea, and (8 506.79 ± 662.83), (7 428.96 ± 712.99) and (8 044.32 ± 1 077.54) µm/mm(2) in the nasal cornea, respectively, in the microkeratome group, and (16 351.59 ± 3 503.88), (1 859.38 ± 452.93) and (2 043.67 ± 377.76) in the central cornea, (12 328.22 ± 2 007.43), (1 483.85 ± 371.28) and (2 126.31 ± 279.87) µm/mm(2) in the temporal cornea, and (8 347.91 ± 789.44), (1 475.53 ± 293.98) and (2 022.10 ± 282.89) µm/mm(2) in the nasal cornea, respectively, in the femtosecond laser group. The SNDs at three positions all decreased significantly at each time point postoperatively compared to the baseline values in both groups (1 and 3 months in the microkeratome group: central t = 18.981 and 18.912, temporal t = 30.121 and 27.921, and nasal t = 6.456 and 2.126; in the femtosecond laser group: central t = 22.667 and 22.379, temporal t = 29.000 and 28.376, and nasal t = 46.329 and 41.751; all P < 0.01, except 3 months at the nasal in the microkeratome group, P = 0.042). The nasal SND increased significantly from month 1 to month 3 (t = -3.921, P < 0.01) in the microkeratome group, and the temporal and nasal SNDs both increased significantly from month 1 to month 3 (t = -9.629 and -6.645, both P < 0.01) in the femtosecond group. There were no significant differences in the central SND between the two groups (F = 0.002, P = 0.96). Significant differences were found in the nasal SND between the groups at 1 month and 3 months (t = 42.281 and 29.608, both P < 0.01), and in the temporal SND at 3 months after surgery (t = -4.595, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Peripheral corneal nerve recovery occurred at 1 month after LASIK surgery. Patients with a femtosecond laser showed better corneal regeneration than those with a microkeratome.

摘要

目的

比较使用微型角膜刀和飞秒激光行准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)后角膜基质层下神经密度(SND)的变化。

方法

前瞻性临床研究。纳入30例近视患者的60只眼。15例患者(30只眼)使用Moria II微型角膜刀行LASIK手术,另外15例患者(30只眼)使用60kHz IntraLase飞秒激光。术前、术后1个月和3个月通过共聚焦显微镜测量中央、颞侧和鼻侧角膜SND,并进行比较。采用方差分析和t检验比较不同时间点及两组之间的差异。

结果

微型角膜刀组术前、术后1个月、3个月中央角膜SND分别为(16728.30±4300.30)、(1875.42±300.50)和(1701.55±194.11)µm/mm²,颞侧角膜分别为(11379.70±1833.92)、(1341.20±288.68)和(1860.87±147.60)µm/mm²,鼻侧角膜分别为(8506.79±662.83)、(7428.96±712.99)和(8044.32±1077.54)µm/mm²;飞秒激光组中央角膜分别为(16351.59±3503.88)、(1859.38±452.93)和(2043.67±377.76),颞侧角膜分别为(12328.22±2007.43)、(1483.85±371.28)和(2126.31±279.87)µm/mm²,鼻侧角膜分别为(8347.91±789.44)、(1475.53±293.98)和(2022.10±282.89)µm/mm²。两组术后各时间点三个位置的SND均较基线值显著降低(微型角膜刀组1个月和3个月:中央t=18.981和18.912,颞侧t=30.121和27.921,鼻侧t=6.456和2.126;飞秒激光组:中央t=22.667和22.379,颞侧t=29.000和28.376,鼻侧t=46.329和41.751;均P<0.01,微型角膜刀组鼻侧3个月除外,P=0.042)。微型角膜刀组鼻侧SND从术后1个月到3个月显著增加(t=-3,921,P<0.01),飞秒激光组颞侧和鼻侧SND从术后1个月到3个月均显著增加(t=-9.629和-6.645,均P<0.01)。两组中央SND无显著差异(F=0.002,P=0.96)。两组在术后1个月和3个月鼻侧SND有显著差异(t=42.281和29.608,均P<0.01),术后3个月颞侧SND有显著差异(t=-4.595,P<0.01)。

结论

LASIK术后1个月角膜周边神经开始恢复。飞秒激光手术患者角膜再生情况优于微型角膜刀手术患者。

相似文献

1
[Corneal subbasal nerve density changes after laser in situ keratomileusis with mechanical microkeratome and femtosecond laser].[机械微型角膜刀和飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术后角膜基质层下神经密度变化]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Jan;51(1):39-44.
2
Subbasal nerve density and corneal sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis: femtosecond laser vs mechanical microkeratome.准分子原位角膜磨镶术后基底神经密度和角膜敏感性:飞秒激光与机械微型角膜刀的比较
Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 Nov;128(11):1413-9. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.253.
3
Tear menisci after laser in situ keratomileusis with mechanical microkeratome and femtosecond laser.准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术中使用机械角膜刀和飞秒激光后撕裂的板层角膜。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Aug 21;55(9):5806-12. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13669.
4
In vivo corneal confocal microscopy comparison of intralase femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome for laser in situ keratomileusis.飞秒激光制瓣与机械微型角膜刀在准分子原位角膜磨镶术中的体内共聚焦显微镜比较
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Jul;47(7):2803-11. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-1207.
5
Fellow Eye Comparison of Nerve Fiber Regeneration After SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK: A Confocal Microscopy Study.微笑模式(SMILE)与飞秒激光辅助准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)后神经纤维再生的眼内比较:一项共聚焦显微镜研究
J Refract Surg. 2015 Sep;31(9):594-8. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20150820-04.
6
[Analysis of flap thickness by anterior segment optical coherence tomography in different flap preparation styles of excimer laser surgery].[准分子激光手术不同瓣制作方式下角膜瓣厚度的眼前节光学相干断层扫描分析]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Mar;46(3):203-8.
7
Measurement of corneal curvature change after mechanical laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation and femtosecond laser flap creation.机械法准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)制作角膜瓣和飞秒激光制作角膜瓣后角膜曲率变化的测量。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Feb;34(2):238-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.09.023.
8
Intraocular straylight after thin-flap LASIK with a femtosecond laser versus a mechanical microkeratome.飞秒激光制瓣 LASIK 与机械角膜刀制瓣术后眼内散射光比较
J Refract Surg. 2013 Aug;29(8):534-9. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20130719-03.
9
[Comparison of posterior vitreous detachment after femtosecond laser and microkeratome-assisted lase in situ keratomileusis].[飞秒激光与微型角膜刀辅助准分子原位角膜磨镶术后玻璃体后脱离的比较]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Apr;49(4):309-14.
10
[Femtosecond lenticule extraction for correction of myopia: clinical results and recovery of subbasal nerves].[飞秒透镜切除术矫正近视:临床结果及基底膜下神经的恢复]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Mar;52(3):198-205. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2016.03.010.

引用本文的文献

1
Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a mechanical microkeratome compared to LASIK with a femtosecond laser for LASIK in adults with myopia or myopic astigmatism.与使用飞秒激光进行准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)相比,使用机械微型角膜刀进行的成人近视或近视散光准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 7;4(4):CD012946. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012946.pub2.