Beach Kirk W, Leotta Daniel F, Zierler R Eugene
Ultrasound Reading Center and the D.E. Strandness Jr. Vascular Laboratory at University of Washington Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2012 Aug;46(6):466-74. doi: 10.1177/1538574412452159. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
Duplex ultrasound with Doppler velocimetry is widely used to evaluate the presence and severity of internal carotid artery stenosis; however, a variety of velocity criteria are currently being applied to classify stenosis severity. The purpose of this study is to compare published Doppler velocity measurements to the severity of internal carotid artery stenosis as assessed by x-ray angiography in order to clarify the relationship between these 2 widely used approaches to assess carotid artery disease.
Scatter diagrams or "scattergrams" of correlations between Doppler velocity measurements and stenosis severity as assessed by x-ray contrast angiography were obtained from published articles for native and stented internal carotid arteries. The scattergrams were graphically digitized, combined, and segmented into categories bounded by 50% and 70% diameter reduction. These data were combined and divided into 3 sets representing different velocity parameters: (1) peak systolic velocity, (2) end-diastolic velocity, and (3) the internal carotid artery to common carotid artery peak systolic velocity ratio. The horizontal axis of each scattergram was transformed to form a cumulative distribution function, and thresholds were established for the stenosis categories to assess data variability.
Nineteen publications with 22 data sets were identified and included in this analysis. Wide variability was apparent between all 3 velocity parameters and angiographic percent stenosis. The optimal peak systolic velocity thresholds for stenosis in stented carotid arteries were higher than those for native carotid arteries. Within each category of stenosis, the variability of all 3 velocity parameters was significantly lower in stented arteries than in native arteries.
Although Doppler velocity criteria have been successfully used to classify the severity of stenosis in both native and stented carotid arteries, the relationship to angiographic stenosis contains significant variability. This analysis of published studies suggests that further refinements in Doppler velocity criteria will not lead to improved correlation with carotid stenosis as demonstrated by angiography.
采用多普勒测速的双功超声广泛用于评估颈内动脉狭窄的存在及严重程度;然而,目前应用了多种速度标准来对狭窄严重程度进行分类。本研究的目的是将已发表的多普勒速度测量结果与通过X线血管造影评估的颈内动脉狭窄严重程度进行比较,以阐明这两种广泛用于评估颈动脉疾病的方法之间的关系。
从已发表的关于天然和支架置入的颈内动脉的文章中获取多普勒速度测量值与通过X线造影血管造影评估的狭窄严重程度之间相关性的散点图。这些散点图经图形数字化、合并,并分为直径缩小50%和70%界定的类别。这些数据被合并并分为3组,分别代表不同的速度参数:(1)收缩期峰值速度,(2)舒张末期速度,以及(3)颈内动脉与颈总动脉收缩期峰值速度比值。每个散点图的横轴进行变换以形成累积分布函数,并为狭窄类别设定阈值以评估数据变异性。
确定了19篇包含22个数据集的出版物并纳入本分析。所有3个速度参数与血管造影狭窄百分比之间均存在明显的变异性。支架置入的颈动脉狭窄的最佳收缩期峰值速度阈值高于天然颈动脉。在每个狭窄类别中,支架置入动脉中所有3个速度参数的变异性均显著低于天然动脉。
尽管多普勒速度标准已成功用于对天然和支架置入的颈动脉狭窄严重程度进行分类,但与血管造影狭窄的关系存在显著变异性。对已发表研究的这项分析表明,多普勒速度标准的进一步细化不会导致与血管造影所示的颈动脉狭窄的相关性得到改善。