Suppr超能文献

颈动脉狭窄的检测与量化:各种多普勒速度参数的效能

Detection and quantification of carotid artery stenosis: efficacy of various Doppler velocity parameters.

作者信息

Hunink M G, Polak J F, Barlan M M, O'Leary D H

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993 Mar;160(3):619-25. doi: 10.2214/ajr.160.3.8430567.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the accuracies of the different Doppler velocity parameters used to grade stenoses of the carotid artery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seven velocity parameters determined with Doppler spectra were compared with angiographic findings in 138 carotid bifurcations: the peak systolic and peak end-diastolic velocities in the internal and common carotid arteries, the ratios of peak systolic and peak end-diastolic velocities between the internal and common carotid arteries, and the ratio of peak systolic velocity in the internal carotid artery to peak end-diastolic velocity in the common carotid artery. A receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed, with and without correction for the bias introduced by preferentially selecting patients for angiography, if the Doppler results indicated a lesion. Multiple regression analysis was performed to predict the percent stenosis and to predict the probability of a 70% or greater stenosis.

RESULTS

Of the Doppler parameters, the peak systolic velocity in the internal carotid artery and its ratio to the peak end-diastolic velocity in the common carotid artery were the most accurate and had equivalent test performance (ROC area = 0.94; after correction for verification bias, ROC area = 0.78). In multiple regression analysis, the peak systolic velocity in the internal carotid artery was the most significant parameter, although its ratio to the peak end-diastolic velocity in the common carotid artery had incremental value in detecting a 70% or greater stenosis, and the peak systolic velocity in the common carotid artery provided additional information for quantifying the stenosis.

CONCLUSION

The peak systolic velocity in the internal carotid artery is the best single velocity parameter for quantifying a stenosis and for detecting a 70% or greater stenosis.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估和比较用于分级颈动脉狭窄的不同多普勒速度参数的准确性。

材料与方法

将通过多普勒频谱测定的七个速度参数与138个颈动脉分叉处的血管造影结果进行比较:颈内动脉和颈总动脉的收缩期峰值速度和舒张期末峰值速度、颈内动脉与颈总动脉之间的收缩期峰值速度和舒张期末峰值速度之比,以及颈内动脉收缩期峰值速度与颈总动脉舒张期末峰值速度之比。如果多普勒结果显示有病变,则进行接受者操作特征(ROC)分析,包括校正因优先选择患者进行血管造影而引入的偏倚和不校正偏倚两种情况。进行多元回归分析以预测狭窄百分比和预测70%或更高狭窄的概率。

结果

在多普勒参数中,颈内动脉的收缩期峰值速度及其与颈总动脉舒张期末峰值速度之比最准确,且具有同等的测试性能(ROC面积 = 0.94;校正验证偏倚后,ROC面积 = 0.78)。在多元回归分析中,颈内动脉的收缩期峰值速度是最显著的参数,尽管其与颈总动脉舒张期末峰值速度之比在检测70%或更高狭窄方面具有增量价值,且颈总动脉的收缩期峰值速度为量化狭窄提供了额外信息。

结论

颈内动脉的收缩期峰值速度是用于量化狭窄和检测70%或更高狭窄的最佳单一速度参数。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验