Center of Bioethics and Humanities, Upstate Medical University, USA.
J Law Med Ethics. 2012 Summer;40(2):301-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00665.x.
Law is now routinely included in the medical school curriculum, often incorporated into bioethics and/or practice of medicine coursework. There seems to lack, however, a systematic understanding of what works in terms of getting across an effective depth and breadth of legal knowledge for medical students - or what such would even look like. Moreover, and more critically, while some literature addresses these what, when, how, and who questions, a more fundamental question is left unanswered: why teach law in medical school? This article suggests a process to reveal a more consensual understanding of this latter question. The author highlights findings and recommendations of some of the leading literature to date related to teaching law in medical schools, and also recent U.K. projects addressing legal teaching in medical schools. Reflecting on these materials and activities, the author suggests that we take a "pause" before we argue for more or different legal topics within the medical curriculum. Before we alter the curricula for more and/or different "law," first, it is critical to have a meaningful, stakeholder-driven, consensus-seeking discussion of the goals of legal education: why do we think it matters that medical students learn about "the law"?
法律现在通常被纳入医学院校的课程中,通常纳入生物伦理学和/或医学实践课程。然而,人们似乎缺乏系统的理解,即对于医学生来说,什么方法可以有效地传授法律知识的深度和广度——或者这样的课程应该是什么样子。此外,更关键的是,尽管一些文献探讨了这些“什么”、“何时”、“如何”和“谁”的问题,但一个更基本的问题仍未得到解答:为什么要在医学院教授法律?本文提出了一个过程来揭示对后一个问题的更一致的理解。作者强调了迄今为止与医学院教授法律相关的一些主要文献的发现和建议,以及最近英国解决医学院法律教学的项目。反思这些材料和活动,作者建议我们在医学课程中主张更多或不同的法律话题之前“暂停”。在我们改变课程以增加更多或不同的“法律”之前,首先,我们必须对法律教育的目标进行有意义的、由利益相关者驱动的、寻求共识的讨论:我们为什么认为让医学生了解“法律”很重要?