State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China;
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Aug 13;53(9):5271-8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9798.
To evaluate an educational intervention promoting acceptance of cataract surgery in rural China using a randomized controlled design.
Patients aged 50 years or older with presenting visual acuity (PVA) less than 6/18 in one or both eyes due to cataract were recruited from 26 screening sessions (13 intervention, 13 control) conducted by five rural hospitals in Guangdong, China. At intervention sessions, subjects were shown a 5-minute informational video, and counseled about cataract, surgery, and surgical cost. During screening, all subjects answered questionnaires on knowledge and attitudes about cataract, their finances, and transportation, and were referred for definitive examination if eligible. Study outcomes were acceptance of surgery (principal outcome) and hospital follow-up.
Subjects in the intervention group were younger than controls (P = 0.01), but the groups did not otherwise differ. Among 212 intervention patients and 222 controls, no differences in knowledge and attitude regarding cataract were found. Surgery was accepted by 31.1% of intervention patients and 34.2% of controls (P > 0.50). Predictors of acceptance included younger age, worse logMAR PVA, knowing that cataract can be treated surgically only, greater anticipated loss in income from hospitalization, and greater house floor space per person. Membership in the intervention group was not associated with accepting surgery (odds ratio [OR] = 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-1.84) or hospital follow-up (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.63-1.67).
Educational interventions that successfully impart the knowledge that cataract can be only treated surgically may be more effective in increasing uptake in this setting. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01123928.).
采用随机对照设计评价在中国农村推广白内障手术接受度的教育干预措施。
从中国广东 5 家农村医院进行的 26 次筛查(干预组 13 次,对照组 13 次)中招募年龄在 50 岁及以上、双眼或单眼的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)因白内障而低于 6/18 的患者。在干预时,研究对象观看了 5 分钟的信息视频,并接受了有关白内障、手术和手术费用的咨询。在筛查期间,所有研究对象都回答了有关白内障的知识和态度、财务状况和交通状况的问卷,如果符合条件,则会被转诊进行明确的检查。研究结果为手术接受度(主要结果)和医院随访。
干预组的研究对象比对照组年轻(P=0.01),但其他方面两组没有差异。在 212 名干预组患者和 222 名对照组患者中,两组对白内障的知识和态度没有差异。干预组中有 31.1%的患者和对照组中有 34.2%的患者接受了手术(P>0.50)。接受手术的预测因素包括年龄较小、BCVA 更差的对数视力(logMAR)、知道白内障只能通过手术治疗、因住院而预期收入损失更大,以及人均住房面积更大。干预组的成员身份与接受手术(比值比[OR] = 1.11,95%置信区间[CI] 0.67-1.84)或医院随访(OR = 1.03,95%CI 0.63-1.67)无关。
在这种情况下,成功传授白内障只能通过手术治疗这一知识的教育干预措施可能更有效地提高手术接受度。(临床试验注册号:NCT01123928)。