Suppr超能文献

硼替佐米、沙利度胺和地塞米松(VTD)作为多发性骨髓瘤移植前诱导治疗的优势:一项随机 3 期 PETHEMA/GEM 研究。

Superiority of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTD) as induction pretransplantation therapy in multiple myeloma: a randomized phase 3 PETHEMA/GEM study.

机构信息

Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Blood. 2012 Aug 23;120(8):1589-96. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-02-408922. Epub 2012 Jul 12.

Abstract

The Spanish Myeloma Group conducted a trial to compare bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone (VTD) versus thalidomide/dexamethasone (TD) versus vincristine, BCNU, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, prednisone/vincristine, BCNU, doxorubicin, dexamethasone/bortezomib (VBMCP/VBAD/B) in patients aged 65 years or younger with multiple myeloma. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate postinduction and post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Three hundred eighty-six patients were allocated to VTD (130), TD (127), or VBMCP/VBAD/B (129). The CR rate was significantly higher with VTD than with TD (35% vs 14%, P = .001) or with VBMCP/VBAD/B (35% vs 21%, P = .01). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer with VTD (56.2 vs 28.2 vs 35.5 months, P = .01). In an intention-to-treat analysis, the post-ASCT CR rate was higher with VTD than with TD (46% vs 24%, P = .004) or with VBMCP/VBAD/B (46% vs 38%, P = .1). Patients with high-risk cytogenetics had a shorter PFS and overall survival in the overall series and in all treatment groups. In conclusion, VTD resulted in a higher pre- and posttransplantation CR rate and in a significantly longer PFS although it was not able to overcome the poor prognosis of high-risk cytogenetics. Our results support the use of VTD as a highly effective induction regimen prior to ASCT. The study was registered with http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00461747) and Eudra CT (no. 2005-001110-41).

摘要

西班牙骨髓瘤小组进行了一项试验,比较硼替佐米/沙利度胺/地塞米松(VTD)与沙利度胺/地塞米松(TD)和长春新碱、卡氮芥、美法仑、环磷酰胺、泼尼松/长春新碱、卡氮芥、阿霉素、地塞米松/硼替佐米(VBMCP/VBAD/B)在年龄在 65 岁或以下多发性骨髓瘤患者中的疗效。主要终点是诱导和自体干细胞移植(ASCT)后完全缓解(CR)率。386 名患者被分配到 VTD(130 人)、TD(127 人)或 VBMCP/VBAD/B(129 人)。VTD 的 CR 率明显高于 TD(35%比 14%,P =.001)或 VBMCP/VBAD/B(35%比 21%,P =.01)。VTD 的中位无进展生存期(PFS)明显长于 VBMCP/VBAD/B(56.2 比 28.2 比 35.5 个月,P =.01)。在意向治疗分析中,VTD 组 ASCT 后的 CR 率高于 TD 组(46%比 24%,P =.004)或 VBMCP/VBAD/B 组(46%比 38%,P =.1)。在整个系列和所有治疗组中,具有高危细胞遗传学的患者的 PFS 和总生存期较短。总之,VTD 在前移植和后移植时提高了 CR 率,并且 PFS 显著延长,尽管它无法克服高危细胞遗传学的不良预后。我们的结果支持在 ASCT 前使用 VTD 作为一种高效的诱导方案。该研究在 http://www.clinicaltrials.gov(NCT00461747)和 Eudra CT(编号 2005-001110-41)上进行了注册。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验