• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孕中期(15~20 周+6 天)和孕晚期(21~24 周+6 天)筛查 21 三体综合征的额前空间比。

Prefrontal space ratio in second- and third-trimester screening for trisomy 21.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Mar;41(3):262-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.12261.

DOI:10.1002/uog.12261
PMID:22791586
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prefrontal space ratio (PFSR) in second- and third-trimester euploid fetuses and fetuses with trisomy 21.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study utilizing stored mid-sagittal two-dimensional images of second- and third-trimester fetal faces that were recorded during prenatal ultrasound examinations at the Department of Prenatal Medicine at the University of Tuebingen, Germany and at a private center for prenatal medicine in Nuremberg, Germany. For the normal range, 279 euploid pregnancies between 15 and 40 weeks' gestation were included. The results were compared with 91 cases with trisomy 21 between 15 and 40 weeks. For the ratio measurement, a line was drawn between the leading edge of the mandible and the maxilla (MM line) and extended in front of the forehead. The ratio of the distance between the leading edge of the skull and the leading edge of the skin (d1) to the distance between the skin and the point where the MM line was intercepted (d2) was calculated. The PFSR was determined by dividing d2 by d1.

RESULTS

In the euploid and trisomy 21 groups, the median gestational age at the time of ultrasound examination was 21.1 (range, 15.0-40.0) and 21.4 (range, 15.0-40.3) weeks, respectively. Multiple regression analysis showed that PFSR was independent of maternal and gestational age. In the euploid group, the mean PFSR was 0.97 ± 0.29. In fetuses with trisomy 21, the mean PFSR was 0.2 ± 0.38 (P < 0.0001). The PFSR was below the 5(th) centile in 14 (5.0%) euploid fetuses and in 72 (79.1%) fetuses with trisomy 21.

CONCLUSION

The PFSR is a simple and effective marker in second- and third-trimester screening for trisomy 21.

摘要

目的

评估二、三孕期正常胎儿和 21 三体胎儿的前额空间比(PFSR)。

方法

本研究为回顾性研究,利用德国图宾根大学产前医学系和德国纽伦堡私人产前医学中心储存的二、三孕期胎儿面部的中矢状二维图像。正常组纳入 279 例孕 15 周至 40 周的正常胎儿,结果与孕 15 周至 40 周的 91 例 21 三体胎儿进行比较。为了进行比值测量,在颏骨和上颌骨前缘(MM 线)之间画一条线,并在前额前方延伸。计算颅骨前缘与皮肤前缘(d1)之间的距离与皮肤与 MM 线交点(d2)之间的距离的比值。通过将 d2 除以 d1 来确定 PFSR。

结果

在正常组和 21 三体组中,超声检查时的中位孕龄分别为 21.1(范围 15.0-40.0)和 21.4(范围 15.0-40.3)周。多元回归分析显示,PFSR 与母体和孕龄无关。在正常组中,平均 PFSR 为 0.97±0.29。在 21 三体组中,平均 PFSR 为 0.2±0.38(P<0.0001)。14 例(5.0%)正常胎儿和 72 例(79.1%)21 三体胎儿的 PFSR 低于第 5 百分位数。

结论

PFSR 是二、三孕期筛查 21 三体的一种简单有效的指标。

相似文献

1
Prefrontal space ratio in second- and third-trimester screening for trisomy 21.孕中期(15~20 周+6 天)和孕晚期(21~24 周+6 天)筛查 21 三体综合征的额前空间比。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Mar;41(3):262-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.12261.
2
Prefrontal space ratio: comparison between trisomy 21 and euploid fetuses in the second trimester.额前空间比率:在孕中期,21 三体与整倍体胎儿的比较。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Sep;40(3):293-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.11120. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
3
Second-trimester screening for trisomy-21 using prefrontal space ratio.使用额前间隙比进行 21 三体综合征的中孕期筛查。
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2013;34(1):50-5. doi: 10.1159/000350271. Epub 2013 May 25.
4
Nasal bone length, prenasal thickness, prenasal thickness-to-nasal bone length ratio and prefrontal space ratio in second- and third-trimester fetuses with Down syndrome.唐氏综合征胎儿中孕期和晚孕期的鼻骨长度、鼻前厚度、鼻前厚度与鼻骨长度比值以及额鼻角。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;45(2):211-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.13391. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
5
Facial profile markers in second- and third-trimester fetuses with trisomy 18.孕中期和孕晚期18三体胎儿的面部轮廓标志物
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;46(1):66-72. doi: 10.1002/uog.14662.
6
Sphenofrontal distance in euploid and aneuploid fetuses.正常胎儿和非整倍体胎儿的蝶额距离。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;50(2):187-191. doi: 10.1002/uog.17284. Epub 2017 Jul 9.
7
The cavum septi pellucidi in euploid and aneuploid fetuses.正常胎儿和染色体异常胎儿的透明隔腔。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Aug;42(2):156-60. doi: 10.1002/uog.12393.
8
Measurement of inferior facial angle and prefrontal space ratio in first trimester fetuses with aneuploidies: a retrospective study.测量早孕期三体胎儿的下面部角度和额前间距比:一项回顾性研究。
J Perinat Med. 2019 Nov 26;47(9):969-978. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2019-0173.
9
Facial markers in second- and third-trimester fetuses with trisomy 18 or 13, triploidy or Turner syndrome.孕中期和孕晚期患有18三体或13三体、三倍体或特纳综合征胎儿的面部特征。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;46(1):60-5. doi: 10.1002/uog.14655. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
10
Fetal facial profile markers of Down syndrome in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.妊娠中晚期唐氏综合征胎儿面部轮廓标记物。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Aug;46(2):168-73. doi: 10.1002/uog.14720. Epub 2015 Jul 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Second trimester soft markers: still worth to be mentioned?孕中期软指标:仍值得一提吗?
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 May;311(5):1233-1240. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08021-7. Epub 2025 Apr 9.
2
Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model to Screen for Trisomy 21 During the First Trimester From Nuchal Ultrasonographic Images.基于颈项透明层超声图像的深度学习模型在早孕期筛查 21 三体的建立与验证
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2217854. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.17854.
3
Ultrasonographic study of fetal facial profile markers during the first trimester.
早孕期胎儿面部轮廓标记的超声研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Apr 24;21(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03813-6.
4
Fetal profile in fetuses with open spina bifida.脊柱裂胎儿的胎儿轮廓。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 May;301(5):1167-1171. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05503-8. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
5
Assessment of Midfacial Hypoplasia in Down Syndrome Fetuses - Validity of a Two-Line Approach and Introduction of a Novel Angle (Maxilla-Mandible-Nasion Angle).唐氏综合征胎儿面中部发育不全的评估——两线法的有效性及一种新角度(上颌骨-下颌骨-鼻根点角)的介绍
Ultrasound Int Open. 2016 May;2(2):E58-62. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-106397.