• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分在脓毒症患者中存在性别差异:是原因还是结果?

Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores differ between genders in a sepsis cohort: cause or effect?

机构信息

Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

Ups J Med Sci. 2012 Nov;117(4):415-25. doi: 10.3109/03009734.2012.703255. Epub 2012 Jul 16.

DOI:10.3109/03009734.2012.703255
PMID:22793786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3497227/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists regarding the influence of gender on sepsis events and outcome. Epidemiological data from other countries may not always apply to local circumstances. The aim of this study was to identify gender differences in patient characteristics, treatment, and outcome related to the occurrence of sepsis at admission to the ICU.

METHODS

A prospective observational cohort study on patients admitted to the ICU over a 3-year period fulfilling sepsis criteria during the first 24 hours. Demographic data, APACHE II score, SOFA score, TISS 76, aetiology, length of stay (LOS), mortality rate, and aspects of treatment were collected and then analysed with respect to gender differences.

RESULTS

There were no gender-related differences in mortality or length of stay. Early organ dysfunction assessed as SOFA score at admission was a stronger risk factor for hospital mortality for women than for men. This discrepancy was mainly associated with the coagulation sub-score. CRP levels differed between genders in relation to hospital mortality. Infection from the abdominopelvic region was more common among women, whereas infection from skin or skin structures were more common in men.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort, gender was not associated with increased mortality during a 2-year follow-up period. SOFA score at ICU admission was a stronger risk factor for hospital mortality for women than for men. The discrepancy was mainly related to the coagulation SOFA sub-score. Together with differences in CRP levels this may suggest differences in inflammatory response patterns between genders.

摘要

背景

性别对脓毒症事件和结局的影响存在争议。来自其他国家的流行病学数据并不总是适用于当地情况。本研究旨在确定 ICU 入院时发生脓毒症的患者特征、治疗和结局方面的性别差异。

方法

对在 3 年内入住 ICU 的患者进行前瞻性观察性队列研究,在入住 ICU 的前 24 小时内符合脓毒症标准。收集人口统计学数据、APACHE II 评分、SOFA 评分、TISS 76、病因、住院时间 (LOS)、死亡率和治疗方面的数据,然后分析性别差异。

结果

性别与死亡率或住院时间无关。入院时 SOFA 评分评估的早期器官功能障碍是女性住院死亡率的一个更强的危险因素,而不是男性。这种差异主要与凝血子评分有关。CRP 水平与性别相关,与住院死亡率有关。女性更常见的感染部位是腹盆腔,而男性更常见的感染部位是皮肤或皮肤结构。

结论

在本队列中,性别与 2 年随访期间的死亡率增加无关。SOFA 评分是女性住院死亡率的一个更强的危险因素,而不是男性。差异主要与凝血 SOFA 子评分有关。与 CRP 水平的差异一起,这可能表明性别之间的炎症反应模式存在差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b02/3497227/35713388e4e3/UPS-117-415-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b02/3497227/31508c764b6e/UPS-117-415-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b02/3497227/35713388e4e3/UPS-117-415-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b02/3497227/31508c764b6e/UPS-117-415-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b02/3497227/35713388e4e3/UPS-117-415-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores differ between genders in a sepsis cohort: cause or effect?序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分在脓毒症患者中存在性别差异:是原因还是结果?
Ups J Med Sci. 2012 Nov;117(4):415-25. doi: 10.3109/03009734.2012.703255. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
2
[Analysis of death risk factors for nosocomial infection patients in an ICU: a retrospective review of 864 patients from 2009 to 2015].[重症监护病房医院感染患者死亡危险因素分析:对2009年至2015年864例患者的回顾性研究]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2016 Aug;28(8):704-8. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2016.08.007.
3
Prospective cohort study comparing sequential organ failure assessment and acute physiology, age, chronic health evaluation III scoring systems for hospital mortality prediction in critically ill cirrhotic patients.前瞻性队列研究,比较序贯器官衰竭评估和急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅲ在预测重症肝硬化患者医院死亡率方面的作用。
Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Feb;60(2):160-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2005.00634.x.
4
Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.SOFA 评分、SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对 ICU 收治的疑似感染成人院内死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20328.
5
Multicenter observational study of the development of progressive organ dysfunction and therapeutic interventions in normotensive sepsis patients in the emergency department.多中心观察性研究:正常血压脓毒症患者在急诊科进展性器官功能障碍的发生和治疗干预。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 May;20(5):433-40. doi: 10.1111/acem.12137.
6
Application of SOFA score to trauma patients. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分在创伤患者中的应用。序贯器官衰竭评估。
Intensive Care Med. 1999 Apr;25(4):389-94. doi: 10.1007/s001340050863.
7
[Prognostic value of Charlson weighted index of comorbidities combined with sequential organ failure assessment score and procalcitonin in patients with sepsis].[脓毒症患者中Charlson合并症加权指数联合序贯器官衰竭评估评分及降钙素原的预后价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Nov;31(11):1335-1339. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.11.005.
8
Predictive performance of quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment for mortality and ICU admission in patients with infection at the ED.急诊科感染患者中快速脓毒症相关器官功能衰竭评估对死亡率和入住重症监护病房的预测性能。
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Sep;34(9):1788-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.06.015. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
9
Utility of SOFA and Δ-SOFA scores for predicting outcome in critically ill patients from the emergency department.SOFA 和 Δ-SOFA 评分对急诊危重症患者预后预测的价值。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;25(6):387-393. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000472.
10
[Lactic acid, lactate clearance and procalcitonin in assessing the severity and predicting prognosis in sepsis].[乳酸、乳酸清除率及降钙素原在评估脓毒症严重程度及预测预后中的作用]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Apr;32(4):449-453. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200129-00086.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex differences in the SOFA score of ICU patients with sepsis or septic shock: a nationwide analysis.脓毒症或脓毒性休克 ICU 患者 SOFA 评分的性别差异:一项全国性分析。
Crit Care. 2024 Jun 27;28(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04996-y.
2
Sex and gender differences in intensive care medicine.重症医学中的性别差异。
Intensive Care Med. 2023 Oct;49(10):1155-1167. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07194-6. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
3
Sex differences in clinical presentation and mortality in emergency department patients with sepsis.脓毒症急诊患者的临床表现和死亡率的性别差异。

本文引用的文献

1
Gender-related outcome difference is related to course of sepsis on mixed ICUs: a prospective, observational clinical study.性别相关结局差异与综合 ICU 脓毒症病程相关:一项前瞻性、观察性临床研究。
Crit Care. 2011 Jun 21;15(3):R151. doi: 10.1186/cc10277.
2
Severe sepsis and septic shock: a prospective population-based study in Icelandic intensive care units.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克:冰岛重症监护单位的一项前瞻性基于人群的研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011 Jul;55(6):722-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02437.x. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
3
Initial fluid resuscitation of patients with septic shock in the intensive care unit.
Ann Med. 2023;55(2):2244873. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2244873.
4
Sex-related differences in adult patients with status epilepticus: a seven-year two-center observation.成年癫痫持续状态患者的性别差异:一项为期七年的两中心观察研究。
Crit Care. 2023 Aug 5;27(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04592-6.
5
The influence of inflammation on cardiovascular disease in women.炎症对女性心血管疾病的影响。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2022 Oct 11;3:979708. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.979708. eCollection 2022.
6
Gender differences in the provision of intensive care: a Bayesian approach.性别差异在重症监护中的体现:贝叶斯方法。
Intensive Care Med. 2021 May;47(5):577-587. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06393-3. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
7
Gender-related differences in the performance of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) to predict septic shock after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.性别对经皮肾镜取石术后预测脓毒性休克的序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)表现的影响。
Urolithiasis. 2021 Feb;49(1):65-72. doi: 10.1007/s00240-020-01190-x. Epub 2020 May 5.
8
Sex differences in crude mortality rates and predictive value of intensive care unit-based scores when applied to the cardiac intensive care unit.在心脏重症监护病房中,基于重症监护病房的评分在粗死亡率和预测价值方面的性别差异。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Dec;9(8):966-974. doi: 10.1177/2048872619872129. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
9
The Outcomes of Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients Requiring Intensive Care Unit Admission- A Single Center Experience.需要入住重症监护病房的儿科造血干细胞移植受者的结局——单中心经验
Transl Perioper Pain Med. 2019;6(3):75-80. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
重症监护病房感染性休克患者的初始液体复苏。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011 Apr;55(4):394-400. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02399.x. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
4
The frequency and clinical significance of thrombocytopenia complicating critical illness: a systematic review.血小板减少症合并危重症的频率和临床意义:系统评价。
Chest. 2011 Feb;139(2):271-278. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-2243. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
5
Gender differences in mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者死亡率的性别差异。
Gend Med. 2010 Oct;7(5):422-37. doi: 10.1016/j.genm.2010.09.005.
6
Infections of respiratory or abdominal origin in ICU patients: what are the differences?ICU 患者的呼吸道或腹部来源感染:有何不同?
Crit Care. 2010;14(2):R32. doi: 10.1186/cc8909. Epub 2010 Mar 15.
7
Thrombocytopenia and outcome in critically ill patients with bloodstream infection.血小板减少症与血流感染危重症患者的预后。
Heart Lung. 2010 Jan-Feb;39(1):21-6. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2009.07.005. Epub 2009 Oct 15.
8
Evaluation of SOFA-based models for predicting mortality in the ICU: A systematic review.评估基于序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)的模型预测重症监护病房(ICU)死亡率:一项系统评价。
Crit Care. 2008;12(6):R161. doi: 10.1186/cc7160. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
9
Building a continuous multicenter infection surveillance system in the intensive care unit: findings from the initial data set of 9,493 patients from 71 Italian intensive care units.在重症监护病房建立持续的多中心感染监测系统:来自意大利71个重症监护病房9493例患者初始数据集的结果
Crit Care Med. 2008 Apr;36(4):1105-13. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318169ed30.
10
Influence of gender on the outcome of severe sepsis: a reappraisal.性别对严重脓毒症预后的影响:重新评估
Chest. 2007 Dec;132(6):1786-93. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-0420. Epub 2007 Sep 21.