Suppr超能文献

分析食管穿孔、瘘管或吻合口漏致食管支架置入失败的原因。

Analysis of unsuccessful esophageal stent placements for esophageal perforation, fistula, or anastomotic leak.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, St. Vincent Hospital, Indianapolis, Indiana 46260, USA.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Sep;94(3):959-64; discussion 964-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.05.047. Epub 2012 Jul 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Esophageal stent placement for the treatment of a perforation, anastomotic leak, or fistula has been adopted by some thoracic surgeons. Results have been reported for this technique, but little discussion has focused on treatment failures. This analysis reviews patients in whom esophageal stent placement was not successful in an attempt to identify factors that may increase the likelihood of failure of this technique.

METHODS

Patients undergoing esophageal stent placement for the treatment of an esophageal perforation, anastomotic leak, or fistula in which the stent failed to adequately seal the esophageal leak were identified from a single institution's database. The anatomic location, chronicity, and cause of the esophageal leak were recorded using a newly developed classification system. Comparison was made to patients in whom stent placement was successful.

RESULTS

Over a 7-year period, 187 patients had an esophageal stent placed for esophageal leaks. Fifteen (8%) of these patients required traditional operative repair when the esophageal stent failed to resolve the esophageal leak after an average of 3 days. A comparison of the 2 patient groups found that stent failure was significantly more frequent in patients who had an esophageal leak of the proximal cervical esophagus, 1 that traversed the gastroesophageal junction, an esophageal injury longer than 6 cm, or an anastomotic leak associated with a more distal conduit leak (p<0.05). Malignancy or previous radiation therapy was not associated with treatment failure.

CONCLUSIONS

This investigation identified 4 factors that significantly reduce the effectiveness of esophageal stent placement for the treatment of esophageal perforation, fistula, or anastomotic leak. These potential contraindications should be considered when developing a treatment plan for individual patients and may prompt traditional operative repair as initial therapy.

摘要

背景

一些胸外科医生采用食管支架置入术治疗穿孔、吻合口漏或瘘。已经有报道介绍了该技术的结果,但很少有讨论集中在治疗失败上。本分析回顾了食管支架置入术治疗食管穿孔、吻合口漏或瘘失败的患者,试图确定可能增加该技术失败可能性的因素。

方法

从单一机构的数据库中确定了因食管穿孔、吻合口漏或瘘而行食管支架置入术治疗,但支架未能充分封闭食管漏的患者。使用新开发的分类系统记录食管漏的解剖位置、慢性程度和原因。与支架置入成功的患者进行比较。

结果

在 7 年期间,187 例患者因食管漏而行食管支架置入术。这些患者中有 15 例(8%)在平均 3 天后,由于食管支架未能解决食管漏,需要传统手术修复。对这 2 组患者的比较发现,支架失败在以下患者中更为频繁:近端颈段食管漏、穿过胃食管交界处的漏、长度超过 6 厘米的食管损伤或与更下游的导管漏相关的吻合口漏(p<0.05)。恶性肿瘤或先前的放射治疗与治疗失败无关。

结论

本研究确定了 4 个显著降低食管支架置入术治疗食管穿孔、瘘或吻合口漏效果的因素。在为个别患者制定治疗计划时应考虑这些潜在的禁忌症,并且可能促使传统的手术修复作为初始治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验