Suppr超能文献

在一项针对全髋关节置换术后中重度疼痛患者的 2 中心、随机、双盲、先导试验中,静脉注射吗啡与静脉注射吗啡和羟考酮联合使用的镇痛效果和耐受性。

Analgesic efficacy and tolerability of intravenous morphine versus combined intravenous morphine and oxycodone in a 2-center, randomized, double-blind, pilot trial of patients with moderate to severe pain after total hip replacement.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia/Operative Intensive Care, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2012 Aug;34(8):1751-60. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.06.023. Epub 2012 Jul 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Results from studies with a combination of oral morphine and oxycodone in postsurgical patients demonstrate significant analgesia and a tolerability profile comparable to other pain medications at morphine-equivalent doses. However, an intravenous (IV) combination has not previously been studied.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of IV morphine versus a combination of IV morphine and IV oxycodone in a 1:1 ratio.

METHODS

This was a 2-center, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled pilot trial of 40 patients who had undergone total hip replacement. After surgery, when pain levels reached ≥4 (on the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale), patients were randomized to 1 of 2 treatment groups. In part 1 of the study, patients were dosed every 5 minutes for the first 65 minutes (up to 13 doses) with study drug, provided that vital signs criteria were met. After an initial loading dose of either morphine 1.5 mg coadministered with oxycodone 1.5 mg or morphine 3 mg alone, patients received IV morphine 1.5 mg or IV morphine 0.75 mg/IV oxycodone 0.75 mg every 5 minutes. If patients achieved a pain score of 2 or experienced intolerable adverse events to drug when stable, they were permitted to enter part 2. In part 2, patients received blinded study medication (IV morphine plus IV oxycodone [0.5 mg/0.5 mg] or 1 mg IV morphine alone) via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for 47 hours.

RESULTS

At baseline, treatment groups were comparable except for a higher proportion of females in the IV morphine group. Baseline pain intensity averaged 7 on the Numerical Pain Rating Scale of 0 to 10. One patient in the morphine group and 2 patients in the morphine/oxycodone group discontinued the study. The sum of the pain intensity differences from baseline to 65 minutes during the dose-titration phase was 1.8 for morphine alone versus 2.7 for morphine/oxycodone (P = 0.12); these values occurred at the same median number of doses (12) for each group. In part 2 (PCA dosing) of the study, similar levels of analgesia were achieved. During the study, 24% of the IV morphine/oxycodone group and 37% of the IV morphine group experienced nausea, and 10% of the IV morphine/oxycodone group and 16% of the IV morphine group had emesis. Two patients in the IV morphine/oxycodone group and 4 in the IV morphine alone group experienced oxygen desaturation.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of IV morphine and oxycodone provided pain relief with an acceptable tolerability profile in these patients experiencing moderate to severe postoperative pain. However, as an explorative pilot study, the power was not adequate to demonstrate statistical significance for differences between IV morphine/oxycodone and IV morphine alone. European Clinical Trials Data Base registration code: EudraCT-No. 2008-008527-14.

摘要

背景

在术后患者中进行的联合口服吗啡和羟考酮的研究结果表明,与其他等效剂量的吗啡类药物相比,该联合用药具有显著的镇痛效果和可耐受的特性。然而,此前尚未研究过静脉(IV)联合用药。

目的

本研究评估了静脉注射吗啡与 IV 吗啡和 IV 羟考酮 1:1 比例的组合在疗效和耐受性方面的差异。

方法

这是一项在两家中心进行的、随机、双盲、阳性对照的初步试验,共有 40 名接受全髋关节置换术的患者参与。手术后,当疼痛水平达到≥4(数字疼痛评分量表 11 分制)时,患者被随机分为两组治疗组之一。在研究的第一部分中,患者在满足生命体征标准的情况下,每 5 分钟接受 1 次研究药物治疗,持续 65 分钟(最多 13 次剂量)。在初始负荷剂量为吗啡 1.5mg 联合羟考酮 1.5mg 或单独吗啡 3mg 后,患者每 5 分钟接受 IV 吗啡 1.5mg 或 IV 吗啡 0.75mg/IV 羟考酮 0.75mg。如果患者疼痛评分达到 2 分或在稳定时出现无法耐受的药物不良反应,他们可以进入第二部分。在第二部分中,患者通过患者自控镇痛(PCA)接受盲法研究药物(IV 吗啡加 IV 羟考酮[0.5mg/0.5mg]或单独 1mg IV 吗啡)治疗 47 小时。

结果

在基线时,两组治疗组除了吗啡组中女性比例较高外,其他方面均无差异。基线疼痛强度平均为 7,采用 0 到 10 的数字疼痛评分量表。吗啡组中有 1 名患者和吗啡/羟考酮组中有 2 名患者退出了研究。在滴定阶段,从基线到 65 分钟的疼痛强度总和吗啡组为 1.8,吗啡/羟考酮组为 2.7(P=0.12);两组的中位数剂量相同(各 12 次)。在研究的第二部分(PCA 剂量)中,两组均达到了相似的镇痛水平。在研究期间,吗啡/羟考酮组有 24%的患者出现恶心,吗啡组有 37%的患者出现恶心,吗啡/羟考酮组有 10%的患者出现呕吐,吗啡组有 16%的患者出现呕吐。吗啡/羟考酮组有 2 名患者和吗啡组有 4 名患者出现血氧饱和度下降。

结论

在经历中度至重度术后疼痛的这些患者中,静脉注射吗啡和羟考酮联合使用可缓解疼痛,具有可接受的耐受性特征。然而,作为一项探索性初步研究,其效力不足以证明静脉注射吗啡和羟考酮与单独静脉注射吗啡之间的差异具有统计学意义。欧洲临床试验数据基础注册码:EudraCT-No. 2008-008527-14。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验