• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性下胫腓联合损伤的管理:一项全国性调查的结果。

The management of acute distal tibio-fibular syndesmotic injuries: results of a nationwide survey.

机构信息

Department of Surgery-Traumatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Injury. 2012 Oct;43(10):1718-23. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.015. Epub 2012 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.015
PMID:22795845
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Ankle fractures are one of the most frequently encountered musculoskeletal injuries, and 10% of patients have a concomitant distal tibiofibular syndesmotic disruption necessitating surgical repair. A national survey was conducted to gain more insight into the current approaches in the management of syndesmotic injuries in the Netherlands.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A postal survey was sent to one or two staff members of the trauma and orthopaedic surgery departments in each of the 86 hospitals in the Netherlands. Questions concerned the pre-, per- and postoperative strategies and the different ideas on the type, number and placement of the syndesmotic screw.

RESULTS

A total of 85.2% of the trauma surgeons and 61.9% of the orthopaedic surgeons responded (representing 87% of all hospitals). Syndesmotic injury was judged mainly using the 'Hook test'. Syndesmotic injuries in a Weber-B ankle fracture were treated with one screw in 81.2% of cases and in Maisonneuve injuries mainly with two screws. The 3.5-mm screw was used most frequently over three cortices at 2.1-4.0cm above the tibial plafond. Removal of the syndesmotic screw was routinely done by 87.0% of surgeons, mostly between 6 and 8 weeks. Of all respondents, 62.3% showed interest in participating in a randomised controlled trial comparing standard removal with removal on indication.

CONCLUSION

Compared with previous surveys our survey is more complete, has the highest response rate and has almost national coverage. Most individual items reviewed compare well with current literature, except for the routine removal of the syndesmotic screw, which might not be encouraged from a literature point of view. For this reason, the results of the current survey will be used in the development of a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing the functional outcome in routine removal of the syndesmotic screw compared with removal on indication.

摘要

简介

踝关节骨折是最常见的肌肉骨骼损伤之一,10%的患者伴有下胫腓联合远端的分离性损伤,需要手术修复。进行了一项全国性调查,以更深入地了解荷兰在治疗下胫腓联合损伤方面的当前方法。

材料和方法

向荷兰 86 家医院的每家创伤和骨科外科的一到两名工作人员发送了一份邮寄调查。问题涉及术前、术中和术后的策略,以及对下胫腓联合螺钉类型、数量和位置的不同看法。

结果

85.2%的创伤外科医生和 61.9%的矫形外科医生(代表所有医院的 87%)做出了回应。“钩试验”主要用于判断下胫腓联合损伤。韦伯-B 型踝关节骨折中的下胫腓联合损伤在 81.2%的病例中用 1 颗螺钉治疗,而 Maisonneuve 损伤主要用 2 颗螺钉治疗。最常用的是 3.5 毫米螺钉,在距胫骨平台上方 2.1-4.0 厘米处穿过三个皮质。87.0%的外科医生常规取出下胫腓联合螺钉,大多在 6-8 周之间。所有受访者中,62.3%表示有兴趣参加一项比较标准取出与指征性取出的随机对照试验。

结论

与之前的调查相比,我们的调查更全面,回复率最高,几乎涵盖了全国范围。除了常规取出下胫腓联合螺钉这一项,这可能不符合文献观点,除了这一项,审查的大多数单项都与当前文献相符。出于这个原因,当前调查的结果将用于开发一项多中心随机对照试验,比较常规取出与指征性取出在下胫腓联合螺钉的功能结果方面的差异。

相似文献

1
The management of acute distal tibio-fibular syndesmotic injuries: results of a nationwide survey.急性下胫腓联合损伤的管理:一项全国性调查的结果。
Injury. 2012 Oct;43(10):1718-23. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.015. Epub 2012 Jul 15.
2
Technical aspects of the syndesmotic screw and their effect on functional outcome following acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.下胫腓联合螺钉的技术要点及其对急性下胫腓联合损伤后功能预后的影响。
Injury. 2014 Apr;45(4):775-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.09.035. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
3
Management of distal tibio-fibular syndesmotic injuries: a snapshot of current practice.胫腓下联合损伤的管理:当前实践概述
Acta Orthop Belg. 2008 Jun;74(3):365-9.
4
Syndesmotic screw placement.下胫腓联合螺钉置入
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2008 Dec;37(12):603; author reply 603.
5
Ankle fracture syndesmosis fixation and management: the current practice of orthopedic surgeons.踝关节骨折下胫腓联合固定与处理:骨科医生的当前实践
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010 May;39(5):242-6.
6
Syndesmotic screw fixation in Weber C ankle injuries--should the screw be removed before weight bearing?Weber C型踝关节损伤的下胫腓螺钉固定——负重前是否应取出螺钉?
Injury. 2006 Sep;37(9):891-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.02.003. Epub 2006 Apr 19.
7
Fate of the syndesmotic screw--Search for a prudent solution.下胫腓螺钉的转归——寻求合理的解决方案
Injury. 2015 Nov;46 Suppl 6:S125-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.062. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
8
Ankle fractures involving the fibula proximal to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis.涉及胫腓下联合远端近端腓骨的踝关节骨折。
Foot Ankle Int. 1997 Aug;18(8):513-21. doi: 10.1177/107110079701800811.
9
[Advances of screw internal fixation for the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries].[螺钉内固定治疗下胫腓联合损伤的研究进展]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2009 Dec;22(12):956-8.
10
[Does removal of the syndesmotic screw improve clinical results of operative treatment of ankle fractures with concomitant syndesmosis injury?].[去除下胫腓螺钉是否能改善合并下胫腓联合损伤的踝关节骨折手术治疗的临床效果?]
Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 2010 May-Jun;75(3):143-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of Syndesmotic Ankle Injuries: Results of a Survey of Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America Members.下胫腓联合踝关节损伤的管理:北美小儿骨科学会成员的调查结果
J Pediatr Soc North Am. 2024 Sep 14;9:100114. doi: 10.1016/j.jposna.2024.100114. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
A Review of Syndesmosis Injuries and Preferred Treatment in Football Players.足球运动员下胫腓联合损伤及首选治疗方法综述
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2025 May;18(5):190-200. doi: 10.1007/s12178-025-09954-x. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
3
Functional outcome of routine versus on-demand removal of the syndesmotic screw.
下胫腓螺钉常规取出与按需取出的功能结局
Bone Jt Open. 2023 Dec 18;4(12):957-963. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.412.BJO-2023-0061.
4
Cost-effectiveness of on-demand removal of syndesmotic screws.按需去除下胫腓联合螺钉的成本效益。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Apr;49(2):921-928. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02158-9. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
5
Functional outcome of routine versus on-demand removal of the syndesmotic screw: a multicentre randomized controlled trial.常规与按需拆除下胫腓联合螺钉的功能结果:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Nov;103-B(11):1709-1716. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B11.BJJ-2021-0348.R2.
6
Ankle syndesmotic injury: Tightrope vs screw fixation, A clinical academic survey.踝关节下胫腓联合损伤:带袢钢板与螺钉固定的临床学术调查
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Aug 10;69:102680. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102680. eCollection 2021 Sep.
7
Management of Ankle Fractures With Syndesmotic Disruption: A Survey of Orthopaedic Surgeons.伴有下胫腓联合损伤的踝关节骨折的治疗:骨科医生的一项调查
Cureus. 2021 Jul 14;13(7):e16391. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16391. eCollection 2021 Jul.
8
Is there any change in surgeon's attitude to the management of ankle fractures accompanying syndesmotic injury? A nationwide survey.踝关节骨折伴下胫腓联合损伤的处理中,外科医生的态度是否有变化?一项全国性调查。
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2020;31(3):548-556. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2020.75527.
9
Diagnosis and treatment of ankle syndesmosis injuries with associated interosseous membrane injury: a current concept review.踝关节联合损伤伴骨间膜损伤的诊断与治疗:现状综述
Int Orthop. 2019 Nov;43(11):2539-2547. doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04396-w. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
10
Surveying the management of Achilles tendon ruptures in the Netherlands: lack of consensus and need for treatment guidelines.调查荷兰的跟腱断裂管理情况:缺乏共识和需要治疗指南。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Sep;27(9):2754-2764. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5049-5. Epub 2018 Jul 3.