Suppr超能文献

与电灼术相比,微型切割器扁桃体切除术术中失血量更多。

Microdebrider tonsillectomy associated with more intraoperative blood loss than electrocautery.

作者信息

Stansifer Kyle J, Szramowski Molly G, Barazsu Lindsay, Buchinsky Farrel J

机构信息

Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Oct;76(10):1437-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.06.018. Epub 2012 Jul 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe and compare the intraoperative blood loss in children who underwent tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy during a transition from using electrocautery to a microdebrider.

METHODS

Retrospective case series of a single pediatric otolaryngologist at an urban general hospital. Patients aged 2-20 years who had tonsillectomy, adenoidectomy, or adenotonsillectomy over a 12 month period were included. Tonsillectomy was performed by microdebrider or electrocautery and adenoidectomy was performed by microdebrider, curette, or suction electrocautery. Total intraoperative blood loss was measured and compared between surgical techniques.

RESULTS

Of the 148 patients, 109 had tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy and 39 had adenoidectomy alone. The mean blood loss was 47 ml or 1.8 ± 1.6 ml/kg and the maximum blood loss was 11 ml/kg. Adenoid curette and adenoid microdebrider yielded similar blood loss but were associated with more bleeding than suction electrocautery (P<0.05). Microdebrider tonsillectomy yielded more blood loss than electrocautery tonsillectomy (mean of 2.6 ± 2.2 ml/kg versus 1.2 ± 1.2 ml/kg, P=0.0002). Eighteen percent of adenotonsillectomy patients lost greater than 5% of calculated circulating blood volume (95% CI, 9.8-26). Linear regression models did not show an association between the amount of blood loss and patient age, clinical indication, or the surgeon's experience with the microdebrider (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Microdebrider tonsillectomy is associated with more intraoperative bleeding than electrocautery tonsillectomy. Approximately twice as much blood was lost with the microdebrider, but the absolute increase was insignificant from a hemodynamic perspective.

摘要

目的

描述并比较在从使用电灼术过渡到使用微型切割器进行扁桃体切除术和/或腺样体切除术的儿童患者术中失血量。

方法

对一家城市综合医院的一名儿科耳鼻喉科医生的回顾性病例系列研究。纳入在12个月期间接受扁桃体切除术、腺样体切除术或腺样体扁桃体切除术的2至20岁患者。扁桃体切除术采用微型切割器或电灼术进行,腺样体切除术采用微型切割器、刮匙或吸引电灼术进行。测量并比较不同手术技术之间的术中总失血量。

结果

148例患者中,109例接受了扁桃体切除术(伴或不伴腺样体切除术),39例仅接受了腺样体切除术。平均失血量为47 ml或1.8±1.6 ml/kg,最大失血量为11 ml/kg。腺样体刮匙和腺样体微型切割器导致的失血量相似,但与吸引电灼术相比出血更多(P<0.05)。微型切割器扁桃体切除术比电灼术扁桃体切除术失血量更多(平均为2.6±2.2 ml/kg对1.2±1.2 ml/kg,P=0.0002)。18%的腺样体扁桃体切除术患者失血量超过计算循环血容量的5%(95%可信区间,9.8 - 26)。线性回归模型未显示失血量与患者年龄、临床指征或外科医生使用微型切割器的经验之间存在关联(P>0.05)。

结论

微型切割器扁桃体切除术比电灼术扁桃体切除术术中出血更多。微型切割器导致的失血量约为电灼术的两倍,但从血流动力学角度来看,绝对增加量并不显著。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验