• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据 QRS 形态和 QRS 持续时间对心脏再同步治疗的反应和临床结局的差异。

Differential response to cardiac resynchronization therapy and clinical outcomes according to QRS morphology and QRS duration.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Aug 14;60(7):592-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.03.059. Epub 2012 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.03.059
PMID:22796255
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to examine the relative impact of QRS morphology and duration in echocardiographic responses to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND

At least one-third of all patients treated with CRT fail to derive benefit. Patients without left bundle branch block (LBBB) or patients with smaller QRS duration (QRSd) respond less or not at all to CRT.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed baseline characteristics, clinical and echocardiographic response, and outcomes of all patients who received CRT at our institution between December 2003 and July 2007. Patients were stratified into 4 groups according to their baseline QRS morphology and QRSd.

RESULTS

A total of 496 patients were included in the study; 216 (43.5%) had LBBB and a QRSd ≥150 ms, 85 (17.1%) had LBBB and QRSd <150 ms, 92 (18.5%) had non-LBBB and a QRSd ≥150 ms, and 103 (20.8%) had non-LBBB and QRSd <150 ms. Echocardiographic response (change in ejection fraction) was better in patients with LBBB and QRSd ≥150 ms (12 ± 12%) than in those with LBBB and QRSd <150 ms (8 ± 10%), non-LBBB and QRSd ≥150 ms (5 ± 9%), and non-LBBB and QRSd <150 ms (3 ± 11%) (p < 0.0001). In a multivariate stepwise model with change in ejection fraction as the dependent variable, the presented classification was the most important independent variable (p = 0.0003). Long-term survival was better in LBBB patients with QRSd ≥150 ms (p = 0.02), but this difference was not significant after adjustment for other baseline characteristics (p = 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

QRS morphology is a more important baseline electrocardiographic determinant of CRT response than QRSd.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨心电图 QRS 形态和持续时间对心脏再同步治疗(CRT)反应和临床结局的相对影响。

背景

接受 CRT 治疗的患者中至少有三分之一未能从中获益。无左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)或 QRS 持续时间(QRSd)较小的患者对 CRT 的反应较小或无反应。

方法

我们回顾性评估了 2003 年 12 月至 2007 年 7 月期间在我院接受 CRT 的所有患者的基线特征、临床和心电图反应以及结局。根据患者的基线 QRS 形态和 QRSd 将患者分为 4 组。

结果

共有 496 例患者纳入研究;216 例(43.5%)有 LBBB 和 QRSd≥150ms,85 例(17.1%)有 LBBB 和 QRSd<150ms,92 例(18.5%)有非 LBBB 和 QRSd≥150ms,103 例(20.8%)有非 LBBB 和 QRSd<150ms。心电图反应(射血分数变化)在 LBBB 和 QRSd≥150ms 的患者中较好(12±12%),明显优于 LBBB 和 QRSd<150ms 的患者(8±10%)、非 LBBB 和 QRSd≥150ms 的患者(5±9%)和非 LBBB 和 QRSd<150ms 的患者(3±11%)(p<0.0001)。在以射血分数变化为因变量的多变量逐步模型中,所提出的分类是最重要的独立变量(p=0.0003)。QRSd≥150ms 的 LBBB 患者长期生存率更好(p=0.02),但在调整其他基线特征后,这种差异无统计学意义(p=0.15)。

结论

QRS 形态是 CRT 反应的比 QRSd 更重要的基线心电图决定因素。

相似文献

1
Differential response to cardiac resynchronization therapy and clinical outcomes according to QRS morphology and QRS duration.根据 QRS 形态和 QRS 持续时间对心脏再同步治疗的反应和临床结局的差异。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Aug 14;60(7):592-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.03.059. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
2
QRS frequency characteristics help predict response to cardiac resynchronization in left bundle branch block less than 150 milliseconds.QRS 频率特征有助于预测左束支传导阻滞小于 150 毫秒的心脏再同步反应。
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Dec;11(12):2183-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.07.034. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
3
Effect of PR interval prolongation on long-term outcomes in patients with left bundle branch block vs non-left bundle branch block morphologies undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.左束支传导阻滞与非左束支传导阻滞形态患者心脏再同步治疗中 PR 间期延长对长期预后的影响。
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Oct;14(10):1523-1528. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.05.028. Epub 2017 May 24.
4
Probability and magnitude of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy according to QRS duration and gender in nonischemic cardiomyopathy and LBBB.非缺血性心肌病和左束支传导阻滞患者中,根据QRS时限和性别对心脏再同步治疗的反应概率及程度
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Jul;11(7):1139-47. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.04.001. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
5
Predictors of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with a non-left bundle branch block morphology.非左束支传导阻滞形态患者对心脏再同步治疗反应的预测因素。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Dec 1;108(11):1576-80. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.07.017. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
6
Effect of QRS Morphology and Duration on Clinical Outcomes After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Analysis of Japanese Multicenter Registry.心脏再同步治疗后 QRS 形态和持续时间对临床结局的影响-日本多中心注册分析。
Circ J. 2018 Jun 25;82(7):1813-1821. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-1383. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
7
Machine Learning of 12-Lead QRS Waveforms to Identify Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Patients With Differential Outcomes.基于 12 导联 QRS 波群的机器学习以识别具有不同预后的心脏再同步治疗患者。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020 Jul;13(7):e008210. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.008210. Epub 2020 Jun 14.
8
Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators With Versus Without Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With a QRS Duration >180 ms.QRS时限>180毫秒的患者植入式心脏复律除颤器同步治疗与非同步治疗的比较
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Apr 25;69(16):2026-2036. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.042.
9
Sex-Specific Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Effect of Left Ventricular Size and QRS Duration in Left Bundle Branch Block.性别对心脏再同步治疗的反应:左束支传导阻滞中左心室大小和 QRS 持续时间的影响。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Aug;3(8):844-853. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.02.021. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
10
Cardiac resynchronization therapy in women versus men: observational comparative effectiveness study from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.女性与男性的心脏再同步治疗:来自国家心血管数据登记处的观察性比较疗效研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Mar;8(2 Suppl 1):S4-11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001548. Epub 2015 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Device Therapy in Patients with Heart Failure: Is Medication Use Optimized and Are We Targeting Those Patients Most Likely to Benefit?心力衰竭患者的器械治疗:药物使用是否得到优化,我们是否针对了最有可能获益的患者?
CJC Open. 2025 Apr 29;7(8):997-1006. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2025.04.016. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Identifying non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy in the non-left bundle branch block.识别非左束支传导阻滞患者中对心脏再同步治疗无反应者。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Jan 3. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01972-y.
3
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Improves Outcomes in Patients With Intraventricular Conduction Delay But Not Right Bundle Branch Block: A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
心脏再同步治疗改善伴有室内传导延迟但无右束支传导阻滞患者的结局:一项随机对照试验的患者水平荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2023 Mar 7;147(10):812-823. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.062124. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
4
QRS Narrowing Following CRT Implantation: Predictors, Dynamics, and Association with Improved Long-Term Outcome.心脏再同步化治疗植入术后QRS波变窄:预测因素、动态变化及其与长期预后改善的关联
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 26;11(5):1279. doi: 10.3390/jcm11051279.
5
Spectrum of clinical applications of interlead ECG heterogeneity assessment: From myocardial ischemia detection to sudden cardiac death risk stratification.导联间心电图异质性评估的临床应用谱:从心肌缺血检测到心源性猝死风险分层。
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2021 Nov;26(6):e12894. doi: 10.1111/anec.12894. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
6
Machine Learning of 12-Lead QRS Waveforms to Identify Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Patients With Differential Outcomes.基于 12 导联 QRS 波群的机器学习以识别具有不同预后的心脏再同步治疗患者。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020 Jul;13(7):e008210. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.008210. Epub 2020 Jun 14.
7
Correlation between septal midwall late gadolinium enhancement on CMR and conduction delay on ECG in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.非缺血性扩张型心肌病患者中,心脏磁共振成像(CMR)上室间隔中层延迟钆增强与心电图传导延迟之间的相关性。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020 Jan 25;26:100474. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100474. eCollection 2020 Feb.
8
Machine Learning Prediction of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Improvement Versus Current Guidelines.机器学习预测心脏再同步治疗反应:改善与现行指南比较。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019 Jul;12(7):e007316. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007316. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
9
Cardiogoniometry can predict positive response to cardiac resynchronization therapy - A proof of concept study.心脏角度测量法可预测心脏再同步治疗的阳性反应——一项概念验证研究。
Indian Heart J. 2018 Dec;70 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S60-S63. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 May 24.
10
Predictors of long-term mortality with cardiac resynchronization therapy in mild heart failure patients with left bundle branch block.轻度心力衰竭合并左束支传导阻滞患者接受心脏再同步治疗后长期死亡率的预测因素
Clin Cardiol. 2018 Oct;41(10):1358-1366. doi: 10.1002/clc.23058.