• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别非左束支传导阻滞患者中对心脏再同步治疗无反应者。

Identifying non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy in the non-left bundle branch block.

作者信息

Nakamura Toshihiro, Ishibashi Kohei, Useda Nobuhiko, Oka Satoshi, Miyazaki Yuichiro, Wakamiya Akinori, Nakajima Kenzaburo, Kamakura Tsukasa, Wada Mitsuru, Inoue Yuko, Miyamoto Koji, Nagase Satoshi, Aiba Takeshi, Kusano Kengo

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, 6-1 Kishibe-Shimmachi, Suita, Osaka, 564-8565, Japan.

Department of Advanced Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Jan 3. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01972-y.

DOI:10.1007/s10840-024-01972-y
PMID:39752041
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an important issue in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and non-left bundle branch block (LBBB). Electrocardiogram-gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography imaging (G-MPI SPECT) is typically used to assess left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony. This study aimed to determine whether G-MPI parameters are associated with non-responsiveness to CRT.

METHODS

Between January 2021 and December 2022, 128 patients underwent CRT, of whom 73 with preoperative evaluation using G-MPI were selected. Forty-three patients with non-LBBB (21 and 22 CRT responders and non-responders, respectively) and 30 patients with LBBB were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among patients with non-LBBB, CRT responders and non-responders exhibited no significant differences in baseline characteristics, except for the LV dimension. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified 108° and 27.7° as the optimal cutoff values for the bandwidth and phase standard deviation (SD), respectively, to predict non-responsiveness to CRT (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.762; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.601-0.923 and AUC = 0.742; 95% CI 0.576-0.909, respectively). A multivariate analysis revealed that a cutoff bandwidth of ≥ 108° and phase SD of ≥ 27.7° are independent predictors of non-responsiveness to CRT in patients with non-LBBB (hazard ratio 5.65; 95% CI 1.53-20.9; P = 0.009). In contrast, there were no significant associations between G-MPI parameters and non-responsiveness to CRT in patients with LBBB.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative G-MPI might be associated with non-responsiveness to CRT in patients with non-LBBB, indicating that identifying potential non-responders can improve patient management.

摘要

背景

在射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)且非左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)的治疗中,心脏再同步治疗(CRT)无反应是一个重要问题。心电图门控心肌灌注单光子发射计算机断层扫描成像(G-MPI SPECT)通常用于评估左心室(LV)不同步。本研究旨在确定G-MPI参数是否与CRT无反应相关。

方法

2021年1月至2022年12月期间,128例患者接受了CRT,其中73例术前使用G-MPI进行评估的患者被纳入。分析了43例非LBBB患者(分别有21例和22例CRT反应者和无反应者)和30例LBBB患者。

结果

在非LBBB患者中,除左心室尺寸外,CRT反应者和无反应者在基线特征方面无显著差异。受试者工作特征曲线分析确定带宽为108°和相位标准差(SD)为27.7°分别为预测CRT无反应的最佳截断值(曲线下面积[AUC]分别为0.762;95%置信区间[CI] 0.601 - 0.923和AUC为0.742;95% CI 0.576 - 0.909)。多因素分析显示,对于非LBBB患者,截断带宽≥108°和相位SD≥27.7°是CRT无反应的独立预测因素(风险比5.65;95% CI 1.53 - 20.9;P = 0.009)。相比之下,LBBB患者中G-MPI参数与CRT无反应之间无显著关联。

结论

术前G-MPI可能与非LBBB患者对CRT无反应相关,这表明识别潜在的无反应者可改善患者管理。

相似文献

1
Identifying non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy in the non-left bundle branch block.识别非左束支传导阻滞患者中对心脏再同步治疗无反应者。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Jan 3. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01972-y.
2
Global myocardial work index predicts response to biventricular pacing in patients with non-left bundle branch block.全球心肌做功指数可预测非左束支传导阻滞患者对双心室起搏的反应。
ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Jun;12(3):2210-2224. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15246. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
3
Left ventricular systolic and diastolic dyssynchrony to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy response in heart failure patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.改善扩张型心肌病心力衰竭患者心脏再同步治疗反应的左心室收缩和舒张不同步。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2021 Jun;28(3):1023-1036. doi: 10.1007/s12350-020-02132-1. Epub 2020 May 13.
4
Cardiac resynchronization therapy restored ventricular septal myocardial perfusion and enhanced ventricular remodeling in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy presenting with left bundle branch block.心脏再同步治疗可恢复非缺血性心肌病伴左束支传导阻滞患者的室间隔心肌灌注,并增强心室重构。
Heart Rhythm. 2014 May;11(5):836-41. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.02.014. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
5
T-wave area predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with left bundle branch block.T波面积可预测左束支传导阻滞患者对心脏再同步治疗的反应。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015 Feb;26(2):176-83. doi: 10.1111/jce.12549. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
6
Relationship of Electromechanical Dyssynchrony in Patients Submitted to CRT With LV Lead Implantation Guided by Gated Myocardial Perfusion Spect.门控心肌灌注显像引导下左心室电极植入的心脏再同步治疗患者的机电不同步关系
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018 Oct;111(4):607-615. doi: 10.5935/abc.20180159. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
7
Strain-time curve analysis by speckle tracking echocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Insight into the pathophysiology of responders vs. non-responders.斑点追踪超声心动图在心脏再同步治疗中的应变-时间曲线分析:深入了解反应者与无反应者的病理生理学。
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2016 Apr 18;14:14. doi: 10.1186/s12947-016-0057-4.
8
Left ventricular dimensions predict risk of appropriate shocks but not mortality in cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator recipients with left bundle-branch block and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.左心室维度可预测左束支传导阻滞和非缺血性心肌病的心脏再同步治疗除颤器患者的适当电击风险,但不能预测死亡率。
Europace. 2017 Oct 1;19(10):1689-1694. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw323.
9
Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by QRS Morphology in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT).多中心自动除颤器植入试验-心脏再同步治疗(MADIT-CRT)中 QRS 形态对心脏再同步治疗效果的影响。
Circulation. 2011 Mar 15;123(10):1061-72. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.960898. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
10
Cardiac resynchronization therapy response in heart failure patients with different subtypes of true left bundle branch block.不同亚型真性左束支传导阻滞心力衰竭患者的心脏再同步治疗反应
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018 Jun;52(1):91-101. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0363-x. Epub 2018 Apr 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Improves Outcomes in Patients With Intraventricular Conduction Delay But Not Right Bundle Branch Block: A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.心脏再同步治疗改善伴有室内传导延迟但无右束支传导阻滞患者的结局:一项随机对照试验的患者水平荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2023 Mar 7;147(10):812-823. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.062124. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
2
Left Ventricular Stimulation With Electrical Latency Predicts Mortality in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.左心室电潜伏期刺激预测心脏再同步治疗患者的死亡率。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Jun;7(6):796-805. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.10.015. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
3
JCS/JHRS 2019 Guideline on Non-Pharmacotherapy of Cardiac Arrhythmias.
《日本循环学会/日本心律学会2019年心律失常非药物治疗指南》
Circ J. 2021 Jun 25;85(7):1104-1244. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0637. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
4
Clinical impact of left ventricular paced conduction disturbance in cardiac resynchronization therapy.心脏再同步治疗中心室起搏传导障碍的临床影响。
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Nov;17(11):1870-1877. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.05.031. Epub 2020 May 26.
5
Real-world behavior of CRT pacing using the AdaptivCRT algorithm on patient outcomes: Effect on mortality and atrial fibrillation incidence.使用 AdaptivCRT 算法的 CRT 起搏的真实世界行为对患者预后的影响:对死亡率和房颤发生率的影响。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Apr;31(4):825-833. doi: 10.1111/jce.14376. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
6
Time interval from left ventricular stimulation to QRS onset is a novel predictor of nonresponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy.从左心室刺激到 QRS 起始的时间间隔是预测心脏再同步治疗无反应的新指标。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Mar;16(3):395-402. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.08.035. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
7
Comparison of the effects of selective and non-selective His bundle pacing on cardiac electrical and mechanical synchrony.选择性和非选择性希氏束起搏对心脏电机械同步性的影响比较。
Europace. 2018 Jun 1;20(6):1010-1017. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux120.
8
Longer Left Ventricular Electric Delay Reduces Mitral Regurgitation After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Mechanistic Insights From the SMART-AV Study (SmartDelay Determined AV Optimization: A Comparison to Other AV Delay Methods Used in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy).更长的左心室电延迟可减少心脏再同步治疗后的二尖瓣反流:来自SMART-AV研究(智能延迟确定房室优化:与心脏再同步治疗中使用的其他房室延迟方法的比较)的机制性见解
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016 Nov;9(11). doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004346.
9
QRS Duration or QRS Morphology: What Really Matters in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy?QRS 时限或 QRS 形态:心脏再同步治疗中真正重要的是什么?
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Mar 8;67(9):1104-1117. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.12.039.
10
Relation of QRS duration to response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.QRS波时限与心脏再同步治疗反应的关系。
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Jan 15;115(2):214-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.10.024. Epub 2014 Oct 30.