Suppr超能文献

医学注册代表着患者的重要利益,不应因更严格的监管而被废除。

Medical registries represent vital patient interests and should not be dismantled by stricter regulation.

机构信息

Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol. 2012 Dec;36(6):575-8. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2012.06.009. Epub 2012 Jul 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medical registries serve patients as beneficiaries of quality standards and new treatment opportunities. However, it has been argued that registries threaten patient privacy interests and should therefore be more strictly regulated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

With the European Treatment and Outcome Study for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia as a concrete example we identify and describe how four of the major arguments put forward for stricter regulation fail.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that medical registries should be promoted both for research and quality control, and that the regulatory bureaucratic burden should be reduced.

摘要

背景

医学注册机构为患者提供质量标准和新治疗机会的受益方。然而,有人认为这些注册机构威胁到患者的隐私利益,因此应该受到更严格的监管。

方法和结果

以欧洲慢性髓系白血病治疗和结果研究为例,我们确定并描述了为加强监管而提出的四个主要论点中的四个论点是站不住脚的。

结论

我们的结论是,应该促进医学登记处的发展,以进行研究和质量控制,同时减少监管官僚主义的负担。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验