Suppr超能文献

癌症晚期认知行为干预的系统评价

A systematic review of cognitive behavioral interventions in advanced cancer.

机构信息

Department of Acute and Specialty Care, University of Virginia, School of Nursing, Charlottesville 222908, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Oct;89(1):15-24. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.019. Epub 2012 Jul 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review cognitive behavioral interventions for people with advanced cancer.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using Medline©, CINAHL©, and Psych-info©.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

studies were included in the review if they met the following criteria: (1) the design was a randomized clinical trial, (2) the study tested a cognitive behavioral therapy, including psycho-educational, alternative and complementary therapies (i.e. acupuncture, relaxation), expressive, support and skill building interventions, (3) participants were adults (18 years of age or older) with advanced cancer and the (4) outcomes were directly related to the patient with advanced cancer.

RESULTS

11 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of the studies in the review: treatment effects were not statistically significant in most studies, methods were not consistently described, and samples had limited racial/ethnic diversity.

CONCLUSION

The interpretation of the effectiveness of the CBIs was limited by major challenges to the internal validity of the studies included in the review. The lack of data about the efficacy of CBIs to support people with advanced cancer is a gap in the current knowledge base.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Given the needs of people living with advanced cancer well-designed studies are needed to test interventions that will improve outcomes for people living with advanced cancer.

摘要

目的

系统回顾针对晚期癌症患者的认知行为干预措施。

方法

使用 Medline©、CINAHL© 和 Psych-info© 进行文献检索。

纳入标准

如果研究符合以下标准,则纳入综述:(1) 设计为随机临床试验,(2) 研究测试认知行为疗法,包括心理教育、替代和补充疗法(即针灸、放松)、表达、支持和技能建设干预,(3) 参与者为成年(18 岁或以上)患有晚期癌症,以及 (4) 结果与晚期癌症患者直接相关。

结果

符合纳入标准的研究有 11 项。在本综述中,大多数研究的治疗效果没有统计学意义,方法没有得到一致描述,样本的种族/民族多样性有限。

结论

纳入研究的内部有效性存在重大挑战,限制了对 CBIs 有效性的解释。目前知识基础的一个空白是缺乏支持晚期癌症患者的 CBIs 疗效的数据。

实践意义

鉴于晚期癌症患者的需求,需要进行精心设计的研究来测试干预措施,以改善晚期癌症患者的结局。

相似文献

1
A systematic review of cognitive behavioral interventions in advanced cancer.癌症晚期认知行为干预的系统评价
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Oct;89(1):15-24. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.019. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
5
Interventions for Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis.旧世界皮肤利什曼病的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 1;12(12):CD005067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005067.pub5.
7
Palliative care interventions in advanced dementia.晚期痴呆症的姑息治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 2;12(12):CD011513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011513.pub2.
8
9
Occupational therapy for cognitive impairment in stroke patients.脑卒中患者认知障碍的作业治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 29;3(3):CD006430. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006430.pub3.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Anxiety in terminally ill cancer patients.晚期癌症患者的焦虑。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Nov;42(5):691-701. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.01.013. Epub 2011 May 12.
3
Psychosocial issues in cancer pain.癌症疼痛的心理社会问题。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2011 Aug;15(4):263-70. doi: 10.1007/s11916-011-0190-6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验