• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

NFL-225 测试预测 NCAA 一级足球运动员 1RM 卧推。

NFL-225 test to predict 1RM bench press in NCAA Division I football players.

机构信息

Athletic Performance Department, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Oct;26(10):2623-31. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31826791ef.

DOI:10.1519/JSC.0b013e31826791ef
PMID:22797002
Abstract

The National Football League (NFL)-225 test has gained popularity for assessing muscular performance among college football programs. Although the test is a measure of absolute muscular endurance, it was reputed to be highly correlated with maximum muscular strength. The purposes of this study were to assess the predictive potential of the NFL-225 test for estimating 1 repetition maximum (1RM) bench press performance in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I college football players and to evaluate the accuracy of previous NFL-225 prediction equations. Players (n = 289) in a successful Division I program were assessed over a period of 5 years for 1RM bench press and repetitions completed with 102.3 kg (225 lb). Test sessions occurred within 1 week of each other during the off-season training period. In a validation group (n = 202), repetitions were significantly correlated with 1RM (r = 0.95), producing a prediction equation (1RM [kg] = 103.5 + 3.08 Reps) with a standard error of estimate = 6.4 kg (coefficient of variation = 4.3%). In a randomly selected cross-validation group (n = 87), the new equation nonsignificantly underpredicted by 0.9 ± 7.2 kg produced a high correlation with actual 1RM (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.967), had a limit of agreement of -15.0 to 13.2 kg, and predicted 69% of the group within ±4.5 kg of their actual 1RM. The best previous equation was that of Slovak et al., which was nonsignificantly underpredicted by -0.5 ± 6.7 kg, produced a high correlation with actual 1RM (ICC = 0.975), and predicted 68% of the group within ±4.5 kg of their actual 1RM. The new NFL-225 test seems to be a reasonable predictor of 1RM bench press in Division I players but should be further assessed on players from other high-level programs.

摘要

国家橄榄球联盟(NFL)-225 测试在评估大学生橄榄球项目的肌肉表现方面越来越受欢迎。虽然该测试是衡量绝对肌肉耐力的指标,但它被认为与最大肌肉力量高度相关。本研究的目的是评估 NFL-225 测试对估计全国大学生体育协会一级学院足球运动员 1 次重复最大(1RM)卧推表现的预测潜力,并评估之前 NFL-225 预测方程的准确性。在一个成功的一级学院项目中,289 名球员在 5 年内接受了 1RM 卧推和 102.3 公斤(225 磅)完成的重复次数评估。测试在淡季训练期间每周进行一次。在验证组(n=202)中,重复次数与 1RM 显著相关(r=0.95),产生了一个预测方程(1RM[kg]=103.5+3.08 Reps),估计标准误差为 6.4kg(变异系数=4.3%)。在随机选择的交叉验证组(n=87)中,新方程低估了 0.9±7.2kg,与实际 1RM 高度相关(组内相关系数[ICC]=0.967),其一致性界限为-15.0 至 13.2kg,预测了 69%的组在实际 1RM 的±4.5kg 范围内。之前最好的方程是斯洛伐克等人的方程,低估了-0.5±6.7kg,与实际 1RM 高度相关(ICC=0.975),预测了 68%的组在实际 1RM 的±4.5kg 范围内。新的 NFL-225 测试似乎是一级学院 1RM 卧推的合理预测指标,但应在其他高水平项目的运动员中进一步评估。

相似文献

1
NFL-225 test to predict 1RM bench press in NCAA Division I football players.NFL-225 测试预测 NCAA 一级足球运动员 1RM 卧推。
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Oct;26(10):2623-31. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31826791ef.
2
Anthropometry increases 1 repetition maximum predictive ability of NFL-225 test for Division IA college football players.人体测量学提高了 NFL-225 测试对 NCAA 一级大学足球运动员 1 次重复最大预测能力。
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Jun;24(6):1429-39. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d682fa.
3
Efficacy of the National Football League-225 Test to Track Changes in One Repetition Maximum Bench Press After Training in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division IA Football Players.美国国家橄榄球联盟-225测试对美国国家大学体育协会第一分区甲组橄榄球运动员训练后卧推一次最大重量变化的追踪效果。
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Nov;29(11):2997-3005. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000829.
4
Upper-body work capacity and 1RM prediction are unaltered by increasing muscular strength in college football players.上身工作能力和 1RM 预测不受大学足球运动员肌肉力量增加的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Dec;23(9):2477-86. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b1ae5f.
5
Validation of the NFL-225 test for predicting 1-RM bench press performance in college football players.用于预测大学橄榄球运动员卧推1次最大重复量表现的NFL-225测试的验证
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2002 Sep;42(3):304-8.
6
Anthropometric dimensions do not enhance one repetition maximum prediction from the NFL-225 test in college football players.人体测量维度并不能提高大学橄榄球运动员通过NFL-225测试对一次重复最大值的预测。
J Strength Cond Res. 2004 Aug;18(3):572-8. doi: 10.1519/1533-4287(2004)18<572:ADDNEO>2.0.CO;2.
7
Lower-body work capacity and one-repetition maximum squat prediction in college football players.大学生足球运动员下半身工作能力和一次重复最大深蹲预测。
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Feb;26(2):364-72. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318225eee3.
8
Reliability and smallest worthwhile difference of the NFL-225 test in NCAA Division I football players.NCAA 一级足球运动员中 NFL-225 测试的可靠性和最小有意义差异。
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 May;28(5):1427-32. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000411.
9
Effects of low- and high-volume stretching on bench press performance in collegiate football players.低负荷和高负荷拉伸对大学生橄榄球运动员卧推表现的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Mar;24(3):711-6. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c7c242.
10
The effects of resistance training prioritization in NCAA Division I Football summer training.美国大学体育协会(NCAA)一级联盟橄榄球夏季训练中阻力训练优先级安排的效果
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Jan;28(1):14-22. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182977e56.

引用本文的文献

1
Important features of bench press performance in non-disabled and Para athletes: A scoping review.非残疾运动员和残奥运动员卧推表现的重要特征:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 11;19(11):e0310127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310127. eCollection 2024.
2
Is two-point method a valid and reliable method to predict 1RM? A systematic review.两点法预测 1RM 是否有效且可靠?系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 20;18(11):e0294509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294509. eCollection 2023.
3
Physical Characteristics and Performance of Japanese Top-Level American Football Players.
日本顶级美式橄榄球运动员的身体特征与表现
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Sep;31(9):2455-2461. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001714.