• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

摇篮海岸个人控制电子健康记录评估研究

The Cradle Coast personally controlled electronic health record evaluation research.

作者信息

Cummings Elizabeth, Cheek Colleen, Van Der Ploeg Winifred, Orpin Peter, Behrens Heidi, Condon Sharon, Jaffray Linda, Ellis Isabelle, Ringeisen Arnold Barbara, Brogan Robyn, Skinner Timothy

机构信息

eHealth Services Research Group, School of Computing and Information Systems, University of Tasmania, Tasmania.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;178:14-9.

PMID:22797013
Abstract

In 2010 the Federal Government announced funding over two years to create a Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) for Australians. One of the wave 2 implementation sites is the Cradle Coast in Tasmania. A PCEHR Program Benefits and Evaluation Partner (BEP) has been appointed to undertake evaluation activities with the e-health lead implementation sites. In addition to this implementation a comprehensive research plan has been developed and commenced through the Rural Clinical School at the University of Tasmania. The overarching aim of the research agenda is to evaluate the outcomes of various elements of the 4C project as it evolves and is implemented, from multiple perspectives. The research agenda is important as it expands upon the NEHTA mandated evaluation and provides an holistic overview of the PCEHR implementation process and outcomes for clinicians, patients and family members. This paper will detail the planned evaluation and its progress to date.

摘要

2010年,联邦政府宣布在两年内提供资金,为澳大利亚人创建个人控制的电子健康记录(PCEHR)。塔斯马尼亚州的摇篮海岸是第二阶段实施地点之一。已任命一名PCEHR项目效益与评估合作伙伴(BEP),与电子健康牵头实施地点开展评估活动。除了这一实施工作外,还通过塔斯马尼亚大学农村临床学院制定并启动了一项全面的研究计划。该研究议程的总体目标是从多个角度评估4C项目各个要素在发展和实施过程中的成果。该研究议程很重要,因为它在国家电子健康过渡管理局(NEHTA)规定的评估基础上进行了拓展,并全面概述了PCEHR对临床医生、患者和家庭成员的实施过程及成果。本文将详细介绍计划中的评估及其迄今取得的进展。

相似文献

1
The Cradle Coast personally controlled electronic health record evaluation research.摇篮海岸个人控制电子健康记录评估研究
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;178:14-9.
2
A qualitative study of Australians' opinions about personally controlled electronic health records.一项关于澳大利亚人对个人控制电子健康记录看法的定性研究。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;178:105-10.
3
Australia's personally controlled electronic health record and primary healthcare: generating a framework for implementation and evaluation.澳大利亚的个人控制电子健康记录与初级医疗保健:构建实施与评估框架
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;188:1-6.
4
A pilot study on the views of elderly regional Australians of personally controlled electronic health records.一项关于澳大利亚地区老年人对个人控制电子健康记录看法的试点研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Mar;83(3):201-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.12.001. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
5
Current patient and healthcare worker attitudes to eHealth and the personally controlled electronic health record in major hospitals.主要医院中当前患者和医护人员对电子健康和个人控制的电子健康记录的态度。
Intern Med J. 2016 Jun;46(6):717-22. doi: 10.1111/imj.13086.
6
Using community based participatory research as a method for investigating electronic health records.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;208:40-4.
7
Implementation of standardized nomenclature in the electronic medical record.电子病历中标准化命名法的实施。
Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2009 Oct-Dec;20(4):169-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618X.2009.01132.x.
8
Disease specific advance care planning for heart failure patients: implementation in a large health system.心力衰竭患者特定疾病的预先医疗照护计划:在大型医疗体系中的实施。
J Palliat Med. 2011 Nov;14(11):1224-30. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0105. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
9
The Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) for Adults with Severe Communication Impairments: Findings of Pilot Research.针对严重沟通障碍成年人的个人控制电子健康记录(PCEHR):试点研究结果
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;214:100-6.
10
eHealth-as-a-Service (eHaaS): a data-driven decision making approach in Australian context.电子健康即服务(eHaaS):澳大利亚背景下的数据驱动决策方法。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;205:915-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Nationwide citizen access to their health data: analysing and comparing experiences in Denmark, Estonia and Australia.全国公民获取其健康数据:分析和比较丹麦、爱沙尼亚及澳大利亚的情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 7;17(1):534. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2482-y.