• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全国公民获取其健康数据:分析和比较丹麦、爱沙尼亚及澳大利亚的情况。

Nationwide citizen access to their health data: analysing and comparing experiences in Denmark, Estonia and Australia.

作者信息

Nøhr Christian, Parv Liisa, Kink Pille, Cummings Elizabeth, Almond Helen, Nørgaard Jens Rahbek, Turner Paul

机构信息

Danish Centre for Health Informatics, Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University, Vestre Havnepromenade 5, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark.

E-Health Laboratory, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 7;17(1):534. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2482-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-017-2482-y
PMID:28784173
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5547535/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most countries face an ageing population, increasing chronic diseased, and constrictions on budget for providing health services. Involving patients in their own care by allowing them access to their patient data is a trend seen in many places.

METHODS

Data on the type and level of access citizens have to their own health data in three countries was gathered from public sources.

RESULTS

Data from each individual country is presented and the experiences of Denmark, Estonia and Australia are examined whilst similarities and differences explored. The discussion adopts a citizen-centred perspective to consider how the different e-portal systems support, protect and structure citizen interactions with their own health data in three key areas: Security, privacy and data protection; User support; and Citizen adoption and use.

CONCLUSIONS

The paper highlights the impact of opt-in/opt-out approaches on citizen access and the lack of a structured approach to addressing differences in citizen health and e-health literacy. This research also confirms while current data provides detail on the availability and use of personal health data by citizens, questions still remain over the ultimate impact on patient outcomes of these initiatives. It is anticipated the insights generated from the three countries experiences, supporting citizen access to their health data will be useful to improve these initiatives and guide other countries aspiring to support similar initiatives.

摘要

背景

大多数国家面临人口老龄化、慢性病增多以及卫生服务预算受限的问题。通过让患者能够获取自己的医疗数据,使其参与自身护理,这是在许多地方都能看到的一种趋势。

方法

从公开来源收集了三个国家公民获取自身健康数据的类型和程度的数据。

结果

展示了每个国家的数据,并审视了丹麦、爱沙尼亚和澳大利亚的经验,同时探讨了异同点。讨论从以公民为中心的视角出发,考量不同的电子门户系统如何在三个关键领域支持、保护并构建公民与自身健康数据的交互:安全、隐私和数据保护;用户支持;以及公民的采用和使用情况。

结论

本文强调了选择加入/选择退出方式对公民获取数据的影响,以及缺乏一种结构化方法来应对公民健康和电子健康素养方面的差异。这项研究还证实,虽然当前数据详细说明了公民对个人健康数据的获取和使用情况,但这些举措对患者治疗结果的最终影响仍存在疑问。预计从这三个国家的经验中获得的见解,即支持公民获取其健康数据,将有助于改进这些举措,并指导其他有志于支持类似举措的国家。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f34/5547535/9ad9ce3e9fc6/12913_2017_2482_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f34/5547535/b7865275c4e3/12913_2017_2482_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f34/5547535/b2a8e724eaf8/12913_2017_2482_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f34/5547535/1e113e0ac09d/12913_2017_2482_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f34/5547535/42d98e23c1a8/12913_2017_2482_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f34/5547535/a302d6326269/12913_2017_2482_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f34/5547535/f9248f8562da/12913_2017_2482_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f34/5547535/9ad9ce3e9fc6/12913_2017_2482_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f34/5547535/b7865275c4e3/12913_2017_2482_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f34/5547535/b2a8e724eaf8/12913_2017_2482_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f34/5547535/1e113e0ac09d/12913_2017_2482_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f34/5547535/42d98e23c1a8/12913_2017_2482_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f34/5547535/a302d6326269/12913_2017_2482_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f34/5547535/f9248f8562da/12913_2017_2482_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f34/5547535/9ad9ce3e9fc6/12913_2017_2482_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Nationwide citizen access to their health data: analysing and comparing experiences in Denmark, Estonia and Australia.全国公民获取其健康数据:分析和比较丹麦、爱沙尼亚及澳大利亚的情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 7;17(1):534. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2482-y.
2
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
3
The Implementation of Federated Digital Identifiers in Health Care: Rapid Review.在医疗保健中实施联合数字标识符:快速审查。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Feb 8;26:e45751. doi: 10.2196/45751.
4
Perspectives of Australian adults about protecting the privacy of their health information in statistical databases.澳大利亚成年人对保护其健康信息在统计数据库中隐私的看法。
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Apr;81(4):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
5
Experiences from patients in mental healthcare accessing their electronic health records: results from a cross-national survey in Estonia, Finland, Norway, and Sweden.精神卫生保健患者获取电子健康记录的体验:来自爱沙尼亚、芬兰、挪威和瑞典的跨国调查结果。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 2;24(1):481. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05916-8.
6
Patient opinion--EHR assessment from the users perspective.患者意见——从用户角度对电子健康记录的评估
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 2):1333-6.
7
Patient opportunities in the Estonian Electronic Health Record System.爱沙尼亚电子健康记录系统中的患者机会。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;156:171-7.
8
Citizens' Access to Their Digital Health Data in Eleven Countries - A Comparative Study.11个国家公民获取其数字健康数据的情况——一项比较研究。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;228:685-9.
9
Empowering citizens with access control mechanisms to their personal health resources.赋予公民访问其个人健康资源的控制机制的权力。
Int J Med Inform. 2013 Jan;82(1):58-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.02.006. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
10
Barriers and Facilitators to Online Portal Use Among Patients and Caregivers in a Safety Net Health Care System: A Qualitative Study.安全网医疗系统中患者及照护者使用在线门户的障碍与促进因素:一项定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Dec 3;17(12):e275. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4847.

引用本文的文献

1
The evolving role of MRI in dentomaxillofacial diagnostics: a comprehensive review.MRI在牙颌面诊断中不断演变的作用:全面综述。
Eur Oral Res. 2025 Jan 5;59(1):58-67. doi: 10.26650/eor.2024145664.
2
New Horizons for Consumer-Mediated Health Information Exchange.消费者介导的健康信息交换的新视野。
Yearb Med Inform. 2024 Aug;33(1):179-190. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1800741. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
3
Identification and Classification Features of Patient Portal, A Systematic Review.患者门户网站的识别与分类特征:一项系统综述

本文引用的文献

1
Patients' online access to their electronic health records and linked online services: a systematic review in primary care.患者在线访问其电子健康记录及相关在线服务:初级保健领域的系统评价
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Mar;65(632):e141-51. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X683941.
2
Danish Citizens' Expectations to the Use of eHealth.丹麦公民对电子健康应用的期望。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;208:78-82.
3
A personally controlled electronic health record for Australia.澳大利亚的个人化电子健康记录。
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 23;8(3):e70520. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70520. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
A systematic review of the effect of personal health records on patient activation.个人健康记录对患者激活作用的系统评价。
Digit Health. 2025 Jan 22;11:20552076251315295. doi: 10.1177/20552076251315295. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
5
Population Digital Health: Continuous Health Monitoring and Profiling at Scale.群体数字健康:大规模连续健康监测与分析
Online J Public Health Inform. 2024 Nov 20;16:e60261. doi: 10.2196/60261.
6
Disease characteristics influence the privacy calculus to adopt electronic health records: A survey study in Germany.疾病特征影响采用电子健康记录的隐私权衡:德国的一项调查研究
Digit Health. 2024 Sep 5;10:20552076241274245. doi: 10.1177/20552076241274245. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
7
How do opt-in versus opt-out settings nudge patients toward electronic health record adoption? An exploratory study of facilitators and barriers in Austria and France.选择加入与选择退出设置如何促使患者采用电子健康记录?奥地利和法国的促进因素和障碍的探索性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 8;24(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10929-w.
8
The Implementation of Federated Digital Identifiers in Health Care: Rapid Review.在医疗保健中实施联合数字标识符:快速审查。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Feb 8;26:e45751. doi: 10.2196/45751.
9
The NORDeHEALTH 2022 Patient Survey: Cross-Sectional Study of National Patient Portal Users in Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Estonia.NORDeHEALTH 2022 患者调查:挪威、瑞典、芬兰和爱沙尼亚国家患者门户用户的横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 13;25:e47573. doi: 10.2196/47573.
10
Building a Sustainable Ecosystem for eHealth in Slovenia: Opportunities, Challenges, and Strategies.为斯洛文尼亚电子健康构建可持续生态系统:机遇、挑战与策略
Digit Health. 2023 Oct 5;9:20552076231205743. doi: 10.1177/20552076231205743. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):707-13. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002068. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
4
Australia's personally controlled electronic health record and primary healthcare: generating a framework for implementation and evaluation.澳大利亚的个人控制电子健康记录与初级医疗保健:构建实施与评估框架
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;188:1-6.
5
Giving patients online access to their records: opportunities, challenges, and scope for service transformation.让患者能够在线访问其病历:服务转型的机遇、挑战与范围
Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Jun;63(611):286-7. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X668032.
6
The PLU problem: are we designing personal ehealth for people like us?个性化医疗单元(PLU)问题:我们是在为像我们这样的人设计个人电子健康服务吗?
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;183:276-80.
7
The Cradle Coast personally controlled electronic health record evaluation research.摇篮海岸个人控制电子健康记录评估研究
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;178:14-9.
8
Adoption and non-adoption of a shared electronic summary record in England: a mixed-method case study.在英格兰采用和不采用共享电子总结记录的情况:一项混合方法案例研究。
BMJ. 2010 Jun 16;340:c3111. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c3111.
9
A healthier future for all Australians: an overview of the final report of the National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission.为全体澳大利亚人打造更健康的未来:国家卫生与医院改革委员会最终报告概述
Med J Aust. 2009 Oct 5;191(7):383-7. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02845.x.
10
Evaluating the quality of medical care.评估医疗质量。
Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966 Jul;44(3):Suppl:166-206.