• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

择期修补小脐疝或上腹部疝后的长期主诉。

Long-term complaints after elective repair for small umbilical or epigastric hernias.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Køge Hospital, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Hernia. 2013 Apr;17(2):211-5. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-0960-z. Epub 2012 Jul 14.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-012-0960-z
PMID:22797701
Abstract

PURPOSE

Elective repair for umbilical or epigastric hernia is a frequent minor surgical procedure. Several studies have demonstrated chronic pain after groin hernia repair but long-term complaints have been only scarcely studied. This study was undertaken to investigate long-term pain and discomfort after open repair for small umbilical or epigastric hernias.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study with prospective long-term follow-up. Only elective primary umbilical or epigastric hernias with an open mesh or sutured repair were included. A structured follow-up questionnaire was sent to all patients regarding verbal rating scores (VRS) of pain and discomfort (no, little, moderate, or severe) and recurrence. Patients with suspected recurrence were clinically examined.

RESULTS

There were 139 eligible patients, and 132 patients answered the questionnaire (95 % response rate). The median follow-up time was 36 months (range 15-85), and defect size was 1.0 cm (0.2-8.0). Sixteen patients reported moderate or severe pain and/or discomfort (12 %, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 6-18). The cumulated risk of recurrence was 11.5 %. Of the 15 patients with clinical recurrence or reoperation for recurrence, 5 patients reported moderate/severe complaints (31 %) whereas 11 of the remaining 116 patients with no recurrence (10 %) reported moderate/severe complaints (P = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

Surprisingly, many patients complained about pain and discomfort 3 years after elective repair for a small umbilical or epigastric hernia.

摘要

目的

择期修复脐疝或上腹疝是一种常见的小型外科手术。多项研究表明,腹股沟疝修补术后会出现慢性疼痛,但长期以来,人们对其相关的抱怨研究甚少。本研究旨在调查开放性小脐疝或上腹疝修补术后的长期疼痛和不适。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,具有前瞻性的长期随访。仅纳入择期的原发性脐疝或上腹疝,采用开放式网片或缝合修复。对所有患者发送了一份结构化的随访问卷,内容包括疼痛和不适的口头评分(VRS)(无、轻微、中度或重度)和复发情况。对疑似复发的患者进行临床检查。

结果

共有 139 例符合条件的患者,其中 132 例患者回答了问卷(95%的应答率)。中位随访时间为 36 个月(范围 15-85 个月),缺损大小为 1.0cm(0.2-8.0cm)。16 例患者报告有中度或重度疼痛和/或不适(12%,95%置信区间(CI):6-18%)。复发的累积风险为 11.5%。在 15 例有临床复发或因复发而再次手术的患者中,有 5 例(31%)报告有中度/重度的不适,而在 116 例无复发的患者中,有 11 例(10%)报告有中度/重度的不适(P=0.014)。

结论

令人惊讶的是,许多患者在择期修复小脐疝或上腹疝 3 年后仍会抱怨疼痛和不适。

相似文献

1
Long-term complaints after elective repair for small umbilical or epigastric hernias.择期修补小脐疝或上腹部疝后的长期主诉。
Hernia. 2013 Apr;17(2):211-5. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-0960-z. Epub 2012 Jul 14.
2
Chronic complaints after simple sutured repair for umbilical or epigastric hernias may be related to recurrence.脐疝或上腹疝单纯缝合修复后的慢性不适可能与复发有关。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Jan;399(1):65-9. doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1119-9. Epub 2013 Sep 14.
3
Lower reoperation rate for recurrence after mesh versus sutured elective repair in small umbilical and epigastric hernias. A nationwide register study.网片修补与缝线修补治疗小脐疝和上腹部疝术后复发的再次手术率更低:一项全国登记研究。
World J Surg. 2013 Nov;37(11):2548-52. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2160-0.
4
Sutured repair of primary small umbilical and epigastric hernias: concomitant rectus diastasis is a significant risk factor for recurrence.原发性小脐疝和上腹疝的缝合修补术:同时存在的腹直肌分离是复发的重要危险因素。
World J Surg. 2015 Jan;39(1):121-6; discussion 127.. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2765-y.
5
Long-term recurrence and chronic pain after repair for small umbilical or epigastric hernias: a regional cohort study.小儿脐疝或上腹疝修补术后的长期复发及慢性疼痛:一项区域队列研究
Am J Surg. 2015 Apr;209(4):725-32. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.05.021. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
6
Nationwide prospective study on readmission after umbilical or epigastric hernia repair.全国范围内脐疝或腹疝修补术后再入院的前瞻性研究。
Hernia. 2013 Aug;17(4):487-92. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1120-9. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
7
Umbilical hernia: factors indicative of recurrence.脐疝:复发的指示因素。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2008;44(11):855-9.
8
Suture versus preperitoneal polypropylene mesh for elective umbilical hernia repairs.用于择期脐疝修补的缝线与腹膜前聚丙烯补片对比研究
J Surg Res. 2014 Dec;192(2):426-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.05.080. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
9
Prosthetic repair of umbilical hernias in adults with local anesthesia in a day-case setting: a comprehensive report from a specialized hernia center.局部麻醉下成人日间手术脐疝修补术:来自疝专科中心的全面报告。
Hernia. 2012 Apr;16(2):163-70. doi: 10.1007/s10029-011-0888-8. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
10
Early complications in surgery of umbilical and epigastric hernias.脐疝和上腹部疝手术的早期并发症
Rozhl Chir. 2020 Spring;99(5):207-211. doi: 10.33699/PIS.2020.99.5.207-211.

引用本文的文献

1
Chronic pain and foreign body sensation based on mesh placement in primary ventral hernia repair: a systematic review highlighting the evidence gap and a call to action.基于原发性腹疝修补术中补片放置的慢性疼痛和异物感:一项强调证据差距并呼吁采取行动的系统评价
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Apr 21;410(1):132. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03671-2.
2
Results of 1‑year follow‑up after umbilical hernia with rectus abdominis muscle diastasis repair using endoscopic subcutaneous onlay approach (SCOLA).采用内镜下皮下植入修补术(SCOLA)治疗脐疝合并腹直肌分离1年随访结果
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2024 Jul 31;19(3):330-335. doi: 10.20452/wiitm.2024.17889. eCollection 2024 Oct 16.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Reoperation versus clinical recurrence rate after ventral hernia repair.再次手术与腹疝修补术后临床复发率。
Ann Surg. 2012 Dec;256(6):955-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318254f5b9.
2
A nationwide study on readmission, morbidity, and mortality after umbilical and epigastric hernia repair.全国范围内脐疝和腹疝修补术后再入院、发病率和死亡率的研究。
Hernia. 2011 Oct;15(5):541-6. doi: 10.1007/s10029-011-0823-z. Epub 2011 May 3.
3
Abdominal wall hernia repair with a composite ePTFE/polypropylene mesh: clinical outcome and quality of life in 152 patients.
Surgery for primary ventral hernias and risk of postoperative pain, nausea: a population-based register study.
原发性腹疝手术与术后疼痛、恶心风险:一项基于人群的登记研究
Hernia. 2025 Jan 15;29(1):68. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03256-4.
4
Gender differences in epigastric hernia repair: a propensity score matching analysis of 15,925 patients from the Herniamed registry.性别差异在胃前疝修补术中的影响:一项来自 Herniamed 登记研究的 15925 例患者的倾向评分匹配分析。
Hernia. 2023 Aug;27(4):829-838. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02799-8. Epub 2023 May 9.
5
Novel Approach for Umbilical Hernia Repair Using Mesh Strips.使用网片条修复脐疝的新方法。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Apr 25;11(4):e4947. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004947. eCollection 2023 Apr.
6
SUMMER Trial: mesh versus suture repair in small umbilical hernias in adults-a study protocol for a prospective randomized double-blind multicenter clinical trial.SUMMER 试验:成人小型脐疝中网片与缝合修补的比较-一项前瞻性随机双盲多中心临床试验研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Jun 22;22(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05366-7.
7
Primary non-complicated midline ventral hernia: overview of approaches and controversies.原发性非复杂性中线腹前壁疝:治疗方法概述及争议。
Hernia. 2019 Oct;23(5):885-890. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02037-0. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
8
A systematic review on surgical treatment of primary epigastric hernias.原发性上腹部疝的手术治疗的系统评价。
Hernia. 2019 Oct;23(5):847-857. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02017-4. Epub 2019 Aug 17.
9
Nationwide Propensity-Score Matched Study of Mesh Versus Suture Repair of Primary Ventral Hernias in Women with a Subsequent Pregnancy.全国性倾向评分匹配研究:比较女性原发性腹疝在再次妊娠后行网片修补与缝合修补的效果。
World J Surg. 2019 Jun;43(6):1497-1504. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-04940-0.
10
Long-term follow-up results of umbilical hernia repair.脐疝修补术的长期随访结果
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2017 Dec;12(4):350-356. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2017.70327. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
腹壁疝修补术复合 ePTFE/聚丙烯网:152 例患者的临床结果和生活质量。
Hernia. 2010 Dec;14(6):555-60. doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0729-1. Epub 2010 Sep 21.
4
[Surgical treatment of ventral hernia].[腹疝的外科治疗]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2010 Jun 28;172(26):1987-9.
5
Does mesh offer an advantage over tissue in the open repair of umbilical hernias? A systematic review and meta-analysis.网片在开放修复脐疝方面优于组织吗?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2010 Oct;14(5):455-62. doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0705-9. Epub 2010 Jul 16.
6
Complications of mesh devices for intraperitoneal umbilical hernia repair: a word of caution.网片在治疗脐疝中的应用:并发症不容忽视。
Hernia. 2011 Aug;15(4):463-8. doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0692-x. Epub 2010 Jun 17.
7
Open intraperitoneal versus retromuscular mesh repair for umbilical hernias less than 3 cm diameter.开放式腹腔内与肌后补片修补法治疗直径小于 3 厘米的脐疝。
Am J Surg. 2011 Jan;201(1):85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.01.022. Epub 2010 Jun 9.
8
Predictive risk factors for persistent postherniotomy pain.预测疝修补术后持续性疼痛的风险因素。
Anesthesiology. 2010 Apr;112(4):957-69. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181d31ff8.
9
Umbilical hernia: factors indicative of recurrence.脐疝:复发的指示因素。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2008;44(11):855-9.
10
Surgeon perspectives on options for ventral abdominal wall hernia repair: results of a postal questionnaire.外科医生对腹前壁疝修补术选择的观点:邮政问卷调查结果
Hernia. 2005 Oct;9(3):259-62. doi: 10.1007/s10029-005-0331-0. Epub 2005 Oct 22.