Suppr超能文献

评估症状性患者前后股骨头覆盖的髋臼壁指数。

The acetabular wall index for assessing anteroposterior femoral head coverage in symptomatic patients.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Bern, Inselspital, Freiburgstrasse, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Dec;470(12):3355-60. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2477-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Understanding acetabular pathomorphology is necessary to correctly treat patients with hip complaints. Existing radiographic parameters classify acetabular coverage as deficient, normal, or excessive but fail to quantify contributions of anterior and posterior wall coverage. A simple, reproducible, and valid measurement of anterior and posterior wall coverage in patients with hip pain would be a clinically useful tool.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We (1) introduce the anterior wall index (AWI) and posterior wall index (PWI), (2) report the intra- and interobserver reliability of these measurements, and (3) validate these measurements against an established computer model.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 87 hips (63 patients) with symptomatic hip disease. A validated computer model was used to determine total anterior and posterior acetabular coverage (TAC and TPC) on an AP pelvis radiograph. Two independent observers measured the AWI and PWI on each film, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated. Pearson correlation was used to determine the strength of linear dependence between our measurements and the computer model.

RESULTS

Intra- and interobserver ICCs were 0.94 and 0.99 for the AWI and 0.81 and 0.97 for the PWI. For validation against the computer model, Pearson r values were 0.837 (AWI versus TAC) and 0.895 (PWI versus TPC). Mean AWI and PWI were 0.28 and 0.81 for dysplastic hips, 0.41 and 0.91 for normal hips, 0.61 and 1.15 for hips with a deep acetabulum.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest these measures will be helpful in evaluating anterior and posterior coverage before and after surgery but need to be evaluated in asymptomatic individuals without hip abnormalities to establish normal ranges.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

背景

了解髋臼的形态学变化对于正确治疗髋部不适的患者非常重要。现有的影像学参数将髋臼覆盖程度分为不足、正常和过度,但无法量化前壁和后壁覆盖的贡献。对于髋部疼痛患者,一种简单、可重复且有效的前壁和后壁覆盖测量方法将是一种非常有用的临床工具。

问题/目的:我们(1)引入了前壁指数(AWI)和后壁指数(PWI),(2)报告了这些测量方法的观察者内和观察者间可靠性,(3)并将这些测量方法与已建立的计算机模型进行了验证。

方法

我们回顾性地分析了 87 髋(63 例患者)的髋部症状性疾病。使用经过验证的计算机模型确定骨盆正位片上髋臼的总前壁和后壁覆盖(TAC 和 TPC)。两名独立观察者对每张图像进行了 AWI 和 PWI 的测量,并计算了组内相关系数(ICC)。皮尔逊相关性用于确定我们的测量值与计算机模型之间线性相关性的强度。

结果

AWI 和 PWI 的观察者内和观察者间 ICC 分别为 0.94 和 0.99 以及 0.81 和 0.97。与计算机模型验证的皮尔逊 r 值分别为 0.837(AWI 与 TAC)和 0.895(PWI 与 TPC)。发育不良髋部的平均 AWI 和 PWI 分别为 0.28 和 0.81,正常髋部为 0.41 和 0.91,髋臼较深的髋部为 0.61 和 1.15。

结论

我们的数据表明,这些测量方法将有助于评估手术前后的前壁和后壁覆盖情况,但需要在没有髋部异常的无症状个体中进行评估,以建立正常范围。

证据水平

III 级,诊断研究。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Radiographic evaluation of the painful adolescent and young adult hip.疼痛性青少年及青年成人髋关节的影像学评估
J Pediatr Soc North Am. 2024 Apr 3;7:100039. doi: 10.1016/j.jposna.2024.100039. eCollection 2024 May.
5
Painful Borderline Acetabular Dysplasia: What's New?疼痛性边缘性髋臼发育不良:有哪些新进展?
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2025 Apr 2;60(1):1-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1790212. eCollection 2025 Feb.

本文引用的文献

3
Acetabular morphology: implications for joint-preserving surgery.髋臼形态学:对保关节手术的影响。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Mar;467(3):682-91. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0682-9. Epub 2009 Jan 8.
4
Mean 20-year followup of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy.伯尔尼髋臼周围截骨术20年平均随访
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Jul;466(7):1633-44. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0242-3. Epub 2008 May 1.
8
Range of motion in anterior femoroacetabular impingement.股骨髋臼前撞击综合征中的活动范围
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 May;458:117-24. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e318031c595.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验