Sinha Rishi, Morris William Z, Ellis Henry B, McGinley James, Podeszwa David A, Sucato Daniel J, Nepple Jeffrey J, Clohisy John C
Scottish Rite for Children, Dallas, TX, USA.
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
J Pediatr Soc North Am. 2024 Apr 3;7:100039. doi: 10.1016/j.jposna.2024.100039. eCollection 2024 May.
Radiographic evaluation of hip pain in adolescents and young adults is an important component of the assessment to aid in the identification of the cause of pain, distinguish between etiologies of early hip degeneration such as acetabular dysplasia (instability) and femoroacetabular impingement, and guide further workup and management. Recent advances in radiographic assessment include the importance of obtaining a standing anterior-posterior radiograph to illustrate the functional position of the pelvis, the use of anterior and posterior wall indices to illustrate anterior and posterior wall coverage and the importance of interpreting radiographic measures in the context of a patient's sagittal balance. Advances in magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and ultrasound have also occurred and can provide further diagnostic clarity. The purpose of this work is to review the literature to provide a systematic approach to the radiographic evaluation of hip pain in skeletally mature adolescents and young adults.
(1)The standing AP pelvis, 45° Dunn, and false-profile views provide a preliminary comprehensive radiographic assessment of the symptomatic hip in the skeletally mature adolescent and young adult and help to distinguish between instability and impingement.(2)The Lateral Center Edge Angle (LCEA) should be augmented by the anterior center edge angle (ACEA), anterior wall index (AWI), and posterior wall index (PWI) to obtain a more complete understanding of 3-dimensional femoral head coverage from plain radiographs.(3)While the crossover and posterior wall signs on radiographs can be helpful in screening for acetabular retroversion and anteversion, CT should be used to confirm if considering reorientation or resection.(4)Cam morphology should be quantitatively assessed using the alpha angle and head-neck offset on the 45° Dunn view.(5)Dynamic ultrasound may be useful in illustrating the motion associated with impingement and instability in real-time but may be limited by the technician-dependent nature of this modality.
对青少年和青年成人髋关节疼痛进行影像学评估是评估的重要组成部分,有助于确定疼痛原因,区分早期髋关节退变的病因,如髋臼发育不良(不稳定)和股骨髋臼撞击症,并指导进一步的检查和治疗。影像学评估的最新进展包括获取站立位前后位X线片以显示骨盆功能位置的重要性,使用前壁和后壁指数以显示前后壁覆盖情况,以及在患者矢状面平衡背景下解读影像学测量结果的重要性。磁共振成像、计算机断层扫描和超声也有进展,可提供进一步的诊断清晰度。本文旨在回顾文献,为骨骼成熟的青少年和青年成人髋关节疼痛的影像学评估提供系统方法。
(1)站立位骨盆前后位片、45°邓恩位片和假斜位片可为骨骼成熟的青少年和青年成人有症状的髋关节提供初步的全面影像学评估,并有助于区分不稳定和撞击。(2)应通过前中心边缘角(ACEA)、前壁指数(AWI)和后壁指数(PWI)补充外侧中心边缘角(LCEA),以便从平片更全面地了解三维股骨头覆盖情况。(3)虽然X线片上的交叉征和后壁征有助于筛查髋臼后倾和前倾,但如果考虑重新定位或切除,应使用CT进行确认。(4)应使用45°邓恩位片上的α角和头颈偏移对凸轮形态进行定量评估。(5)动态超声可能有助于实时显示与撞击和不稳定相关的运动,但可能受该检查方式依赖技术人员的性质所限。