Jarząbek Magdalena, Jargiełło Tomasz, Wolski Andrzej, Poluha Paweł, Szczerbo-Trojanowska Małgorzata
Department of Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Medical University in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Pol J Radiol. 2011 Jul;76(3):26-32.
Only 10 to 20% of patients with hepatic metastases qualify for radical resection of their lesions. The treatment issue among the rest of patients is a small clinical response to overall chemiotherapy and the frequent inability to treat patients with percutaneous thermoablation. In the latter circumstance, parallel to the radical surgery, the reason is the size of the lesion or lack of access to it.
MATERIAL/METHODS: 15 patients with hepatic metastases, who had been rejected from consideration of radical resection and thermoablation were subjected to chemoembolization of the proper hepatic artery branches. The procedure was performed using Hepasphere 50-100 μm impregnated with 100 mg of Doxorubicine. The primary tumor sites included: colorectal ca, cholangiocarcinoma, gastrinoma, gallbladder ca, pancreatic ca, GIST, lung ca, kidney ca, breast ca and larynx ca. The evolution of the disease was monitored by MRI scanning, which was performed after a mean time of 7.6 weeks from the chemoembolization. During the study, we compared patients' quality of life (using Edmonton Evaluating System); length of hospital stay, chemoembolization side effects, and remission or progression of the disease by the RECIST 1.1 scale.
26.7% of patients had remission of the metastatic disease, 33.4% experienced stable desease and 26,7% suffered lesion progression. Two patients did not report to the MRI examination. Chemoembolzation's side effects were small and the quality of patients' live improved. Effectiveness depended on the overal condition of the patient, and the stage of the primary disease.
Chemoembolization is a minimally invasive, safe and possibly effective palliative procedure in patients with hepatic metastases. Further investigation on a larger group of patients is required and will be continued.
仅有10%至20%的肝转移患者适合对其病灶进行根治性切除。其余患者的治疗问题在于对全身化疗的临床反应较小,且经常无法对患者进行经皮热消融治疗。在后一种情况下,与根治性手术类似,原因是病灶大小或难以接近病灶。
材料/方法:15例被拒绝考虑根治性切除和热消融的肝转移患者接受了肝固有动脉分支的化疗栓塞。该操作使用浸渍有100毫克阿霉素的50 - 100微米的载药微球(Hepasphere)进行。原发肿瘤部位包括:结直肠癌、胆管癌、胃泌素瘤、胆囊癌、胰腺癌、胃肠道间质瘤、肺癌、肾癌、乳腺癌和喉癌。通过MRI扫描监测疾病进展,MRI扫描在化疗栓塞后平均7.6周进行。在研究过程中,我们比较了患者的生活质量(使用埃德蒙顿评估系统);住院时间、化疗栓塞的副作用,以及根据RECIST 1.1标准评估的疾病缓解或进展情况。
26.7%的患者转移性疾病缓解,33.4%病情稳定,26.7%病灶进展。两名患者未进行MRI检查。化疗栓塞的副作用较小,患者生活质量得到改善。疗效取决于患者的总体状况和原发疾病的分期。
化疗栓塞是一种微创、安全且可能有效的肝转移患者姑息治疗方法。需要对更大规模的患者群体进行进一步研究,并将继续进行。