Reidy T J, Carstens C
Southern California Permanente Medical Group, San Diego.
J Pers Assess. 1990 Winter;55(3-4):692-7. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674104.
Clinical use of the Millon Adolescent Personality Inventory (MAPI) depends on computerized interpretation of the pattern of scale score elevations in the profile beyond certain cutoff scores rather than the elevations of single scales. There has been no reported work on the stability of the scale scores or the stability of the 2-point codes in a delinquent population. The MAPI was administered to 46 incarcerated male juvenile delinquents and was readministered after a period of 2 to 4 weeks. The test-retest correlations of the base-rate scale scores ranged from .33 to .89 with a mean of .74, which compare favorably to Millon's (1982) standardization sample. However, only 41% of the 2-point codes were judged to be congruent between administrations. The poor congruence of the 2-point codes across administrations raises doubts about interpretive statements based on these codes.
米隆青少年人格问卷(MAPI)的临床应用依赖于对剖面图中量表分数升高模式的计算机化解读,这种解读基于特定的临界分数,而非单个量表的升高情况。目前尚未有关于违法犯罪人群中量表分数稳定性或两点编码稳定性的报道。对46名被监禁的男性青少年违法者施测了MAPI,并在2至4周后进行了重测。基础率量表分数的重测信度在0.33至0.89之间,平均为0.74,与米隆(1982年)的标准化样本相比表现良好。然而,两次施测中只有41%的两点编码被判定为一致。两次施测中两点编码的一致性较差,这引发了对基于这些编码的解释性陈述的质疑。