National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Mailstop F-63, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
Am J Community Psychol. 2012 Dec;50(3-4):572-80. doi: 10.1007/s10464-012-9534-6.
Public health is currently faced with an array of critical challenges and disconnects. Research and evaluation have identified a number of evidence-based strategies for effecting behavior change at individual, group, organizational, and environmental levels, all of which hold promise for leading to substantial reductions in morbidity and mortality, and increased quality of life. Unfortunately, there is huge variability across the public health system in awareness of the value of using evidence to inform decision making, let alone in capacity to locate, assess, compare, select, justify, adapt, implement, and evaluate evidence-based strategies, or to participate in building the evidence base for practice-based innovations. As a result, many communities may not be benefitting from research-tested and practice-based strategies that could help them to meet their public health goals more efficiently and effectively. CDC's Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation (ISF), released in 2008, was designed to help close this gap between research and practice. This commentary identifies the ways in which the ISF framework is useful in addressing the research practice gap; revisits the elements of the framework that have continued to guide research and practice in fruitful ways; and highlights areas that need further development to meet current public health challenges.
公共卫生目前面临着一系列严峻的挑战和脱节问题。研究和评估已经确定了一些在个人、群体、组织和环境层面上实现行为改变的基于证据的策略,这些策略都有望大幅降低发病率和死亡率,提高生活质量。不幸的是,公共卫生系统在利用证据为决策提供信息的价值方面存在巨大差异,更不用说在寻找、评估、比较、选择、证明、适应、实施和评估基于证据的策略的能力,或参与建立基于实践的创新的证据基础方面了。因此,许多社区可能无法受益于经过研究测试和基于实践的策略,这些策略可以帮助他们更有效地实现公共卫生目标。疾病预防控制中心于 2008 年发布的交互式系统传播和实施框架(ISF)旨在帮助缩小研究与实践之间的差距。本评论确定了 ISF 框架在解决研究实践差距方面的有用之处;重新审视了框架中的一些要素,这些要素继续以富有成效的方式指导研究和实践;并强调了需要进一步发展的领域,以应对当前的公共卫生挑战。