University of South Florida, Department of Mental Health Law and Policy, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, 11301 N. Bruce B. Downs Blvd., Tampa, FL 33612, U.S.A.
Behav Sci Law. 2012 Nov-Dec;30(6):800-20. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2024. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
Drug courts and mental health courts have expanded rapidly in the past several decades to provide more efficient coordination of treatment and supervision of offenders with behavioral health problems. A significant number of offenders in these court-based programs have co-occurring mental and substance use disorders, which predict early termination, relapse, rearrest, and other negative outcomes. A web-based national survey examined programmatic adaptations for co-occurring disorders (CODs) among 54 drug courts, mental health courts, and freestanding COD dockets. COD dockets were smaller and of longer duration, and provided more intensive services than programs situated in drug courts or in mental health courts. However, more similarities than differences were noted across the different types of court-based program. Key adaptations for CODs included extended program duration, highly intensive and integrated treatment, smaller, less formal, and more frequent hearings, and use of specialized supervision teams and dually credentialed staff.
在过去几十年中,药物法庭和心理健康法庭迅速发展,以更有效地协调有行为健康问题的罪犯的治疗和监管。这些基于法庭的项目中的许多罪犯同时存在精神和药物使用障碍,这预示着早期终止、复发、再逮捕和其他负面结果。一项基于网络的全国性调查研究了 54 个药物法庭、心理健康法庭和独立的共病法庭案件中的共病(CODs)的项目适应性。CODs 案件规模较小,持续时间较长,提供的服务比设在药物法庭或心理健康法庭的项目更密集。然而,不同类型的法庭项目之间存在更多的相似之处,而不是差异。CODs 的关键适应措施包括延长项目持续时间、高度密集和综合治疗、规模更小、更非正式和更频繁的听证,以及使用专门的监督小组和双重认证的工作人员。