Peters Roger H, Young M Scott, Rojas Elizabeth C, Gorey Claire M
a Department of Mental Health Law and Policy , Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South Florida , Tampa , FL , USA.
b Department of Psychology , University of South Florida , Tampa , FL , USA.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2017 Jul;43(4):475-488. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2017.1303838. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
Over seven million persons in the United States are supervised by the criminal justice system, including many who have co-occurring mental and substance use disorders (CODs). This population is at high risk for recidivism and presents numerous challenges to those working in the justice system.
To provide a contemporary review of the existing research and examine key issues and evidence-based treatment and supervision practices related to CODs in the justice system.
We reviewed COD research involving offenders that has been conducted over the past 20 years and provide an analysis of key findings.
Several empirically supported frameworks are available to guide services for offenders who have CODs, including Integrated Dual Disorders Treatment (IDDT), the Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) model, and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT). Evidence-based services include integrated assessment that addresses both sets of disorders and the risk for criminal recidivism. Although several evidence-based COD interventions have been implemented at different points in the justice system, there remains a significant gap in services for offenders who have CODs. Existing program models include Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT), day reporting centers, specialized community supervision teams, pre- and post-booking diversion programs, and treatment-based courts (e.g., drug courts, mental health courts, COD dockets). Jail-based COD treatment programs provide stabilization of acute symptoms, medication consultation, and triage to community services, while longer-term prison COD programs feature Modified Therapeutic Communities (MTCs).
Despite the availability of multiple evidence-based interventions that have been implemented across diverse justice system settings, these services are not sufficiently used to address the scope of treatment and supervision needs among offenders with CODs.
在美国,超过700万人受到刑事司法系统的监管,其中包括许多同时患有精神疾病和物质使用障碍(共病)的人。这一人群再犯风险很高,给司法系统工作人员带来了诸多挑战。
对现有研究进行当代综述,审视与司法系统中共病相关的关键问题以及循证治疗和监管实践。
我们回顾了过去20年中针对罪犯的共病研究,并对主要研究结果进行分析。
有几个经实证支持的框架可用于指导为患有共病的罪犯提供服务,包括综合双相障碍治疗(IDDT)、风险-需求-反应性(RNR)模型和认知行为疗法(CBT)。循证服务包括针对两种障碍以及刑事再犯风险的综合评估。尽管在司法系统的不同阶段实施了几种循证共病干预措施,但为患有共病的罪犯提供的服务仍存在显著差距。现有的项目模式包括危机干预小组(CIT)、日间报告中心、专门的社区监管小组、逮捕前和逮捕后的分流项目以及基于治疗的法庭(如毒品法庭、心理健康法庭、共病案件)。基于监狱的共病治疗项目提供急性症状的稳定治疗、药物咨询以及转介至社区服务,而长期的监狱共病项目则以改良治疗社区(MTC)为特色。
尽管在不同的司法系统环境中实施了多种循证干预措施,但这些服务并未得到充分利用,无法满足患有共病罪犯的治疗和监管需求范围。