Department of Psychology, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
J Trauma Stress. 2012 Aug;25(4):469-74. doi: 10.1002/jts.21718. Epub 2012 Jul 13.
Theoretical frameworks positing qualitatively distinct trajectories of posttrauma outcome have received initial empirical support, but have not been investigated in cases of severe interpersonal trauma. To address this limitation, we conducted latent class growth analysis with longitudinal data collected from 119 female sexual assault survivors at 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-months postassault. Participants' mean age was 33 years; 63% were White. We hypothesized that given the severity of exposure associated with sexual assault, resilience would not be the modal course of adaptation. Four distinct PTSD growth trajectories, representing unique latent classes of participants, best fit the data: a high chronic trajectory, a moderate chronic trajectory, a moderate recovery trajectory, and a marked recovery trajectory. Contrary to previous studies and recent theoretical models, resilience and resistance trajectories were not observed, as high levels of distress were evident in nearly all participants at 1-month postassault. These results suggest that theoretical models of posttrauma response positing resilience as the modal outcome may not generalize to cases of sexual assault.
理论框架假设创伤后结果存在明显不同的轨迹,这已经得到了初步的实证支持,但在严重人际创伤的情况下尚未得到研究。为了解决这一局限性,我们对 119 名女性性侵犯幸存者在创伤后 1、2、3 和 4 个月时收集的纵向数据进行了潜在类别增长分析。参与者的平均年龄为 33 岁;63%是白人。我们假设,鉴于性侵犯相关的暴露的严重性,适应的模式不会是恢复力。四个不同的 PTSD 增长轨迹,代表了参与者独特的潜在类别,最符合数据:一个高慢性轨迹、一个中度慢性轨迹、一个中度恢复轨迹和一个明显恢复轨迹。与之前的研究和最近的理论模型相反,没有观察到恢复力和抵抗轨迹,因为几乎所有参与者在创伤后 1 个月时都表现出高度的困扰。这些结果表明,假设恢复力是主要结果的创伤后反应理论模型可能不适用于性侵犯案例。