Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Violence Against Women. 2012 May;18(5):611-33. doi: 10.1177/1077801212453139. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
This research used logistic regression to test components of Choice and Lamke's (1997) two-part decision-making model and Hamby's (2008) holistic risk assessment as predictors of the decision to separate from an abusive partner, comparing significant predictors for immigrant (n = 497) and nonimmigrant (n = 808) women. Findings demonstrated that immigrant women reported higher levels of perceived risks/barriers to leaving, provided some support for the use of a holistic risk assessment in understanding women's decisions to leave, and demonstrated that immigrant and nonimmigrant women have both similarities and differences in the factors that predict leaving. Clinical and policy implications are addressed.
本研究采用逻辑回归检验了 Choice 和 Lamke(1997)的两部分决策模型的组成部分和 Hamby(2008)的整体风险评估作为与虐待伴侣分离的决定的预测因素,比较了移民(n = 497)和非移民(n = 808)妇女的显著预测因素。研究结果表明,移民妇女报告的离开的感知风险/障碍水平更高,为使用整体风险评估来理解妇女离开的决定提供了一些支持,并表明移民和非移民妇女在预测离开的因素上既有相似之处,也有不同之处。讨论了临床和政策方面的意义。