Suppr超能文献

比较高剂量利巴韦林诱导与标准利巴韦林剂量联合聚乙二醇干扰素-α治疗 HIV 感染患者慢性丙型肝炎:PERICO 试验。

Comparison of high ribavirin induction versus standard ribavirin dosing, plus peginterferon-α for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients: the PERICO trial.

机构信息

Hospital Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

J Infect Dis. 2012 Sep 15;206(6):961-8. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis449. Epub 2012 Jul 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ribavirin (RBV) exposure seems to be critical to maximize treatment response in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.

METHODS

HIV/HCV-coinfected individuals naive to interferon were prospectively randomized to receive peginterferon-α-2a (180 μg/d) plus either RBV standard dosing (1000 or 1200 mg/d if <75 or ≥ 75 kg, respectively) or RBV induction (2000 mg/d) along with subcutaneous erythropoietin β (450 IU/kg/wk), both during the first 4 weeks, followed by standard RBV dosing until completion of therapy. Early stopping rules at weeks 12 and 24 were applied in patients with suboptimal virological response.

RESULTS

A total of 357 patients received ≥ 1 dose of the study medication. No differences in main baseline characteristics were found when comparing treatment arms. Sustained virological response (SVR) was attained by 160 (45%) patients, with no significant differences between RBV induction and standard treatment arms (SVR in 72 of 169 patients [43%] vs 88 of 188 [47%], respectively). At week 4, undetectable HCV RNA (29% vs 25%) and mean RBV trough concentration (2.48 vs 2.14 μg/mL) were comparable in both arms, whereas mean hemoglobin decay was less pronounced in the RBV induction plus erythropoietin arm than in the RBV standard dosing arm (-1.7 vs -2.3 mg/dL; P < .005). Treatment discontinuation occurred in 91 (25%) patients owing to nonresponse and in 29 (8%) owing to adverse events. HCV relapse occurred in 34 patients (10%). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified HCV genotype 2 or 3 (odds ratio [OR], 10.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.08-50.2; P = .004), IL28B CC variants (OR, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.33-6.41; P = .007), nonadvanced liver fibrosis (OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.06-5.01; P = .03), and rapid virological response (OR, 40.3; 95% CI, 5.1-314.1; P < .001) as predictors of SVR.

CONCLUSIONS

A 4-week course of induction therapy with high RBV dosing along with erythropoietin does not improve SVR rates in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. Preemptive erythropoietin might blunt the benefit of RBV overdosing by enhancing erythrocyte uptake of plasma RBV.

摘要

背景

利巴韦林(RBV)的暴露似乎对最大化感染人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)的慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)患者的治疗反应至关重要。

方法

对初次接受干扰素治疗的 HIV/HCV 合并感染患者进行前瞻性随机分组,分别接受聚乙二醇干扰素-α-2a(180μg/d)联合利巴韦林标准剂量(<75kg 时为 1000mg/d,≥75kg 时为 1200mg/d)或利巴韦林诱导剂量(2000mg/d),同时在最初的 4 周内皮下给予促红细胞生成素β(450IU/kg/周),之后继续使用标准剂量利巴韦林,直至完成治疗。对于病毒学应答不佳的患者,在第 12 周和第 24 周应用提前停药规则。

结果

共有 357 例患者接受了至少一剂研究药物。在比较治疗组时,主要基线特征无差异。160 例(45%)患者获得持续病毒学应答(SVR),利巴韦林诱导组和标准治疗组之间无显著差异(SVR 患者分别为 72 例[43%]和 88 例[47%])。第 4 周时,两组 HCV RNA 均不可测(29%比 25%),利巴韦林谷浓度(2.48μg/ml 比 2.14μg/ml)相似,而在利巴韦林诱导联合促红细胞生成素组,血红蛋白下降幅度较利巴韦林标准剂量组更小(-1.7mg/dL 比-2.3mg/dL;P<0.005)。因无应答而停药的患者有 91 例(25%),因不良反应而停药的患者有 29 例(8%)。34 例患者(10%)出现 HCV 复发。单因素和多因素分析确定 HCV 基因型 2 或 3(比值比[OR],10.3;95%置信区间[CI],2.08-50.2;P=0.004)、IL28B CC 变体(OR,2.92;95%CI,1.33-6.41;P=0.007)、非晚期肝纤维化(OR,2.27;95%CI,1.06-5.01;P=0.03)和快速病毒学应答(OR,40.3;95%CI,5.1-314.1;P<0.001)是 SVR 的预测因素。

结论

在 HIV/HCV 合并感染患者中,4 周的利巴韦林诱导治疗联合促红细胞生成素治疗并不能提高 SVR 率。促红细胞生成素的预先应用可能通过增强血浆利巴韦林的红细胞摄取来削弱利巴韦林过量的益处。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验