Makerere University - University of California San Francisco Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e38888. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038888. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
Contamination by bacterial or fungal organisms reduces the effectiveness of mycobacterial culture for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). We evaluated the effect of an anti-microbial and an anti-fungal oral rinse prior to expectoration on culture-contamination rates.
We enrolled a consecutive random sample of adults with cough for ≥ 2 weeks and suspected TB admitted to Mulago Hospital (Kampala, Uganda) between October 2008 and June 2009. We randomly assigned patients to oral rinse (60 seconds with chlorhexidine followed by 60 seconds with nystatin) vs. no oral rinse prior to initial sputum collection. Uganda National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory technicians blinded to the method of sputum collection (with or without oral rinse) processed all sputum specimens for smear microscopy (direct Ziehl-Neelsen) and mycobacterial culture (Lowenstein-Jensen media).
Of 220 patients enrolled, 177 (80%) were HIV-seropositive (median CD4-count 37 cells/uL, IQR 13-171 cells/uL). Baseline characteristics were similar between patients in the oral-rinse (N = 110) and no oral-rinse (N = 110) groups. The proportion of contaminated cultures was significantly lower in the oral-rinse group compared to the no oral-rinse group (4% vs. 15%, risk difference -11%, 95% CI -18 to -3%, p = 0.005). Oral rinse significantly reduced the proportion of contaminated cultures among HIV-infected patients (3% vs. 18%, risk difference -14%, 95% CI -23 to -6%, p = 0.002) but not HIV-uninfected (6% vs. 4%, risk difference 2%, 95% CI -12 to +15%, p = 0.81) patients. However, the proportion of smear-positive specimens (25% vs. 35%, p = 0.10) and culture-positive specimens (48% vs. 56%, p = 0.24) were lower in the oral-rinse compared to the no oral-rinse group, although the differences were not statistically significant.
Oral rinse prior to sputum expectoration is a promising strategy to reduce mycobacterial culture contamination in areas with high HIV prevalence, if strategies can be devised to reduce the adverse impact of oral rinse on smear- and culture-positivity.
细菌或真菌的污染会降低分枝杆菌培养对肺结核(TB)诊断的有效性。我们评估了在咳痰前使用抗微生物和抗真菌漱口液对培养污染率的影响。
我们连续纳入了 2008 年 10 月至 2009 年 6 月期间在乌干达坎帕拉的穆拉戈医院因咳嗽≥2 周且疑似患有肺结核的成人患者。我们将患者随机分配至漱口组(60 秒氯己定,然后 60 秒制霉菌素)或初始咳痰前不漱口组。乌干达国家结核病参考实验室技术人员对咳痰收集方法(有或没有口腔冲洗)进行了盲法处理,所有痰标本均用于痰涂片显微镜检查(直接齐尔-尼尔森染色)和分枝杆菌培养(Lowenstein-Jensen 培养基)。
220 例患者中,177 例(80%)HIV 血清阳性(中位数 CD4 计数 37 个细胞/μL,IQR 13-171 个细胞/μL)。在漱口组(N=110)和不漱口组(N=110)患者之间,基线特征相似。与不漱口组相比,漱口组污染培养物的比例明显更低(4% vs. 15%,差异风险-11%,95%CI-18%至-3%,p=0.005)。口腔冲洗可显著降低 HIV 感染患者污染培养物的比例(3% vs. 18%,差异风险-14%,95%CI-23%至-6%,p=0.002),但对 HIV 未感染者无影响(6% vs. 4%,差异风险 2%,95%CI-12%至+15%,p=0.81)。然而,与不漱口组相比,漱口组的涂片阳性标本比例(25% vs. 35%,p=0.10)和培养阳性标本比例(48% vs. 56%,p=0.24)更低,但差异无统计学意义。
如果可以设计出降低口腔冲洗对涂片和培养阳性率的不利影响的策略,那么在高 HIV 流行地区,在咳痰前使用口腔冲洗是一种减少分枝杆菌培养污染的有前景的策略。