Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2012 Jun;83(2):196-203. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2012.10599850.
One purpose of the present study was to examine whether self-confidence or anxiety would be differentially affected byfeedback from more accurate rather than less accurate trials. The second purpose was to determine whether arousal variations (activation) would predict performance. On day 1, participants performed a golf putting task under one of two conditions: one group received feedback on the most accurate trials, whereas another group received feedback on the least accurate trials. On day 2, participants completed an anxiety questionnaire and performed a retention test. Shin conductance level, as a measure of arousal, was determined. The results indicated that feedback about more accurate trials resulted in more effective learning as well as increased self-confidence. Also, activation was a predictor of performance.
本研究的目的之一是检验自信或焦虑是否会因来自更准确而非更不准确的试验的反馈而产生差异。第二个目的是确定唤醒变化（激活）是否可以预测表现。在第一天，参与者在两种条件之一下进行高尔夫推杆任务：一组收到最准确试验的反馈，而另一组收到最不准确试验的反馈。在第二天，参与者完成了焦虑问卷并进行了保留测试。皮肤电导水平作为唤醒的一种衡量标准被确定。结果表明，关于更准确试验的反馈不仅使学习更有效，而且还提高了自信。此外，激活是表现的预测因素。
