• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注射成型技术的牙科种植体系统中连接式氧化锆基台的抗折性

Fracture resistance of inter-joined zirconia abutment of dental implant system with injection molding technique.

作者信息

Yang Jianjun, Wang Ke, Liu Guangyuan, Wang Dashan

机构信息

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Affiliated Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Nov;24(11):1247-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02539.x. Epub 2012 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02539.x
PMID:22809060
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Zirconia powder in nanometers can be fabricated into inter-joined abutment of dental implant system with the injection shaping technique. This study was to detect the resistance of inter-joined zirconia abutment with different angle loading for clinical applications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The inter-joined abutments were shaped with the technique of injection of zirconia powder in nanometers. Sixty Osstem GSII 5 × 10 mm implants were used with 30 zirconia abutments and 30 Osstem GSII titanium abutments for fixation using 40 N torque force. The loading applications included 90°, 30°, and 0° formed by the long axis of abutments and pressure head of universal test machine. The fracture resistances of zirconia and titanium abutments were documented and analyzed.

RESULTS

The inter-joined zirconia abutments were assembled to the Osstem GSII implants successfully. In the 90° loading mode, the fracture resistance of zirconia abutment group and titanium abutment group were 301.5 ± 15.4 N and 736.4 ± 120.1 N, respectively. And those in the 30° groups were 434.7 ± 36.1 N and 1073.1 ± 74 N, correspondingly. Significant difference in the two groups was found using t-test and Wilcoxon test. No damage on the abutments of the two groups but S-shaped bending on the implants was found when the 0° loading was 1300-2000 N.

CONCLUSIONS

Through the assembly of Zirconia abutments and implants, all the components presented sufficient resistance acquired for the clinical application under loadings with different angle.

摘要

目的

纳米氧化锆粉末可通过注射成型技术制成牙科种植体系统的联冠基台。本研究旨在检测不同角度加载下联冠氧化锆基台的抗力,以用于临床应用。

材料与方法

采用纳米氧化锆粉末注射成型技术制作联冠基台。使用60颗奥齿泰GSII 5×10 mm种植体,其中30个氧化锆基台和30个奥齿泰GSII钛基台,以40 N扭矩力进行固定。加载方式包括基台长轴与万能试验机压头形成的90°、30°和0°。记录并分析氧化锆和钛基台的抗断裂力。

结果

联冠氧化锆基台成功组装到奥齿泰GSII种植体上。在90°加载模式下,氧化锆基台组和钛基台组的抗断裂力分别为301.5±15.4 N和736.4±120.1 N。在30°组中,相应的抗断裂力分别为434.7±36.1 N和1073.1±74 N。使用t检验和Wilcoxon检验发现两组之间存在显著差异。当0°加载为1300 - 2000 N时,两组基台均未受损,但种植体出现S形弯曲。

结论

通过氧化锆基台与种植体的组装,所有组件在不同角度加载下均表现出足够的抗力,可用于临床应用。

相似文献

1
Fracture resistance of inter-joined zirconia abutment of dental implant system with injection molding technique.注射成型技术的牙科种植体系统中连接式氧化锆基台的抗折性
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Nov;24(11):1247-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02539.x. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
2
Experimental research on the relationship between fit accuracy and fracture resistance of zirconia abutments.氧化锆基台适配精度与抗折性之间关系的实验研究
J Dent. 2014 Oct;42(10):1353-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
3
Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.钛和氧化锆基台的抗折能力:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 May;109(5):304-12. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60306-6.
4
In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.体外静态负荷下三种氧化锆种植体基台的评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Apr;109(4):255-63. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60054-2.
5
Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.老化后支持全瓷冠的氧化锆和钛种植体基台的弯矩
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jan;25(1):74-81. doi: 10.1111/clr.12192. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
6
In vitro performance of zirconia and titanium implant/abutment systems for anterior application.用于前牙区的氧化锆和钛种植体/基台系统的体外性能
J Dent. 2014 Aug;42(8):1019-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
7
In vitro performance of implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns: Influence of patient-specific tooth-coloured abutments with titanium adhesive bases.种植体支持的整体式氧化锆全冠的体外性能:含钛粘结基底的患者个性化牙齿颜色基台的影响。
J Dent. 2015 Jul;43(7):839-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.011. Epub 2015 May 4.
8
Evaluation of the sealing capability of implants to titanium and zirconia abutments against Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, and Fusobacterium nucleatum under different screw torque values.评估在不同螺钉扭矩值下种植体与钛和氧化锆基台对牙龈卟啉单胞菌、中间普氏菌和具核梭杆菌的封闭能力。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Sep;112(3):561-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.11.010. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
9
Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation.老化和咀嚼模拟后,具有内、外种植体-基台连接的氧化锆和钛基台的弯曲力矩。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Jan;23(1):12-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02141.x. Epub 2011 Mar 28.
10
Wear at the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a pilot study.钛-氧化锆种植体-基台界面的磨损:一项初步研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Sep-Oct;26(5):970-5.

引用本文的文献

1
The Fracture Resistance Comparison between Titanium and Zirconia Implant Abutments with and without Ageing: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.有或无老化情况下钛和氧化锆种植体基台的抗折性比较:系统评价与Meta分析
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Aug 23;12(9):274. doi: 10.3390/dj12090274.
2
Comparison between bone-implant interfaces of microtopographically modified zirconia and titanium implants.微形貌改性氧化锆和钛种植体骨-种植体界面的比较。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 10;13(1):11142. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38432-y.
3
Sandblasted and Acid Etched Titanium Dental Implant Surfaces Systematic Review and Confocal Microscopy Evaluation.
喷砂和酸蚀钛牙种植体表面:系统评价与共聚焦显微镜评估
Materials (Basel). 2019 May 30;12(11):1763. doi: 10.3390/ma12111763.
4
Comparison of peri-implant bone formation around injection-molded and machined surface zirconia implants in rabbit tibiae.兔胫骨中注塑成型和机加工表面氧化锆种植体周围种植体周围骨形成的比较。
Dent Mater J. 2015;34(4):508-15. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2015-024.