Clinic for Fixed & Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Jan;23(1):12-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02141.x. Epub 2011 Mar 28.
To test the fracture load of zirconia abutments with different types of implant-abutment connections after chewing simulation and to compare their bending moments to internally connected identical titanium abutments.
Forty-eight identical customized zirconia abutments with different implant-abutment connections were fabricated for four different test groups: one-piece internal implant-abutment connection (BL; Straumann Bonelevel), two-piece internal implant-abutment connection (RS; Nobel Biocare Replace Select), external implant-abutment connection (B; Brånemark MK III), two-piece internal implant-abutment connection (SP; Straumann Standard Plus). Twelve titanium abutments with one-piece internal implant-abutment connection (T; Straumann Bonelevel) served as control group. After aging by means of thermocycling (5-50°C, 120 s) and chewing simulation (1,200,000 cycles, 49 N load, 1.67 Hz), static load was applied at a 30° angle to the palatal surface until failure. Bending moments were calculated for comparison of the groups. Data were analyzed descriptively and by performing the Kruskal-Wallis test with Bonferroni correction.
The mean bending moments of the abutments were 714.1 ± 184.9 N cm (T), 331.7 ± 57.8 N cm (BL), 429.7 ± 62.8 N cm (RS), 285.8 ± 64.4 N cm (B) and 379.9 ± 59.1 N cm (SP). The bending moments of control group T were significantly higher than those of all other groups. The values of group RS were significantly higher than those of group B but within the value range of groups SP and BL.
The bending moments of the different tested types of zirconia abutments vary with different implant-abutment connections after chewing simulation. The use of a secondary metallic component might have a beneficial influence on the stability of zirconia abutments.
通过咀嚼模拟测试不同类型种植体-基台连接的氧化锆基台的断裂负荷,并将其弯曲力矩与内部连接的相同钛基台进行比较。
为四个不同的测试组制作了 48 个具有不同种植体-基台连接的相同定制氧化锆基台:一体式内部种植体-基台连接(BL;Straumann Bonelevel)、分体式内部种植体-基台连接(RS;Nobel Biocare Replace Select)、外连接(B;Brånemark MK III)、分体式内部种植体-基台连接(SP;Straumann Standard Plus)。12 个具有一体式内部种植体-基台连接的钛基台(T;Straumann Bonelevel)作为对照组。通过热循环(5-50°C,120s)和咀嚼模拟(1,200,000 次循环,49N 负载,1.67Hz)老化后,以 30°角向腭面施加静态负载,直到基台失效。计算弯曲力矩以比较各组。数据采用描述性分析和经 Kruskal-Wallis 检验加 Bonferroni 校正进行分析。
基台的平均弯曲力矩分别为 714.1 ± 184.9 N cm(T)、331.7 ± 57.8 N cm(BL)、429.7 ± 62.8 N cm(RS)、285.8 ± 64.4 N cm(B)和 379.9 ± 59.1 N cm(SP)。对照组 T 的弯曲力矩明显高于其他所有组。组 RS 的值明显高于组 B,但在组 SP 和 BL 的值范围内。
经过咀嚼模拟,不同类型氧化锆基台的弯曲力矩随不同的种植体-基台连接方式而变化。使用二次金属部件可能对氧化锆基台的稳定性产生有益影响。