Department of Applied Environmental Science (ITM), Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Aug 7;46(15):8205-11. doi: 10.1021/es301700e. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
The enactment of new chemical regulations has generated a large need for the measurement of the fish bioconcentration factor (BCF). Past experience shows that the BCF determination lacks precision, requires large numbers of fish, and is costly. A new protocol was tested that shortens the experiment from up to 12 weeks for existing protocols to 2 weeks and reduces the number of fish by a factor of 5, while introducing internal benchmarking for the BCF determination. Rainbow trout were simultaneously exposed to 11 chemicals. The BCFs were quantified using one of the test chemicals, musk xylene, as a benchmark. These were compared with BCFs measured in a parallel experiment based on the OECD 305 guideline. The agreement was <20% for five chemicals and between 20%-25% for two further, while two chemicals lay outside the BCF operating window of the experiment and one was lost due to analytical difficulties. This agreement is better than that observed in a BCF Gold Standard Database. Internal benchmarking allows the improvement of the precision of BCF determination in parallel to large reduction in costs and fish requirements.
新化学法规的颁布使得对鱼类生物浓缩因子(BCF)的测量产生了巨大的需求。过去的经验表明,BCF 的测定缺乏精度,需要大量的鱼类,而且成本高昂。本文测试了一种新的方案,该方案将现有方案的实验时间从长达 12 周缩短至 2 周,并将鱼类数量减少了 5 倍,同时引入了 BCF 测定的内部基准。虹鳟鱼同时暴露于 11 种化学物质中。使用其中一种测试化学品麝香二甲苯作为基准来定量 BCF。这些 BCF 值与基于 OECD 305 指南的平行实验中测量的 BCF 值进行了比较。对于五种化学物质,其一致性小于 20%,对于另外两种化学物质,其一致性在 20%-25%之间,而两种化学物质超出了实验的 BCF 工作范围,一种由于分析困难而丢失。这种一致性优于 BCF 黄金标准数据库中观察到的一致性。内部基准允许在大幅降低成本和鱼类需求的同时,提高 BCF 测定的精度。