Burden Natalie, Creton Stuart, Weltje Lennart, Maynard Samuel K, Wheeler James R
National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs), Gibbs Building, 215 Euston Road, London NW1 2BE, UK.
Environmental Protection Authority, 215 Lambton Quay, Wellington 6011, New Zealand.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014 Nov;70(2):442-5. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.08.008. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
Fish bioconcentration test guidelines generally require that bioconcentration factors (BCFs) are determined at two exposure concentrations. However, recent revisions to the OECD test guideline for bioconcentration testing (TG 305) provide the option to use only one exposure concentration, when justification is provided, although two concentrations may still be required for some regulatory purposes. Recently, this justification has been demonstrated for plant protection product active ingredients. To determine whether this justification has a broader validity for general chemicals, an analysis of 236 BCF studies on general chemicals was conducted. The results presented here again demonstrate that BCF values do not significantly differ between concentrations when more than one concentration is used. This relationship is particularly strong for BCFs ⩾1000L/kg, which is beneficial, since only chemicals with BCFs >2000L/kg may require regulatory action. This analysis therefore provides a data-driven rationale for using the one test concentration approach for general chemical substances and thus could contribute to a substantial reduction in the use of fish in bioconcentration tests.
鱼类生物富集试验准则通常要求在两个暴露浓度下测定生物富集因子(BCF)。然而,经济合作与发展组织(OECD)生物富集试验测试准则(TG 305)的最新修订规定,若能提供合理理由,也可仅使用一个暴露浓度,不过出于某些监管目的,可能仍需两个浓度。最近,这一合理性已在植物保护产品活性成分方面得到证明。为确定这一合理性对于一般化学品是否具有更广泛的适用性,对236项关于一般化学品的BCF研究进行了分析。此处呈现的结果再次表明,当使用多个浓度时,不同浓度下的BCF值并无显著差异。对于BCF⩾1000L/kg的情况,这种关系尤为明显,这是有益的,因为只有BCF>2000L/kg的化学品可能需要监管行动。因此,该分析为一般化学物质采用单浓度测试方法提供了数据驱动的依据,从而有助于大幅减少生物富集试验中鱼类的使用。