Suppr超能文献

多支动脉旁路移植可改善冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的晚期存活率:多支血管病变 8622 例患者分析。

Multiple arterial grafts improve late survival of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: analysis of 8622 patients with multivessel disease.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Circulation. 2012 Aug 28;126(9):1023-30. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.084624. Epub 2012 Jul 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Use of the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) in multivessel coronary artery disease improves survival after coronary artery bypass graft surgery; however, the survival benefit of multiple arterial (MultArt) grafts is debated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We reviewed 8622 Mayo Clinic patients who had isolated primary coronary artery bypass graft surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease from 1993 to 2009. Patients were stratified by number of arterial grafts into the LIMA plus saphenous veins (LIMA/SV) group (n=7435) or the MultArt group (n=1187). Propensity score analysis matched 1153 patients. Operative mortality was 0.8% (n=10) in the MultArt and 2.1% (n=154) in the LIMA/SV (P=0.005) group, which was not statistically different (P=0.996) in multivariate analysis or the propensity-matched analysis (P=0.818). Late survival was greater for MultArt versus LIMA/SV (10- and 15-year survival rates were 84% and 71% versus 61% and 36%, respectively [P<0.001], in unmatched groups and 83% and 70% versus 80% and 60%, respectively [P=0.0025], in matched groups). MultArt subgroups with bilateral internal mammary artery/SV (n=589) and bilateral internal mammary artery only (n=271) had improved 15-year survival (86% and 76%; 82% and 75% at 10 and 15 years [P<0.001]), and patients with bilateral internal mammary artery/radial artery (n=147) and LIMA/radial artery (n=169) had greater 10-year survival (84% and 78%; P<0.001) versus LIMA/SV. In multivariate analysis, MultArt grafts remained a strong independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.94; P=0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery with LIMA to left anterior descending artery, arterial grafting of the non-left anterior descending vessels conferred a survival advantage at 15 years compared with SV grafting. It is still unproven whether these results apply to higher-risk subgroups of patients.

摘要

背景

在多支冠状动脉疾病患者中使用左内乳动脉(LIMA)可改善冠状动脉旁路移植术后的生存率;然而,多动脉(MultArt)移植的生存获益仍存在争议。

方法和结果

我们回顾了 1993 年至 2009 年期间,梅奥诊所 8622 例接受多支冠状动脉疾病单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者。患者根据动脉移植物的数量分为 LIMA+隐静脉(LIMA/SV)组(n=7435)或 MultArt 组(n=1187)。采用倾向评分分析匹配了 1153 例患者。MultArt 组的手术死亡率为 0.8%(n=10),而 LIMA/SV 组为 2.1%(n=154)(P=0.005),多变量分析或倾向评分匹配分析均无统计学差异(P=0.996)(P=0.818)。MultArt 组的晚期生存率高于 LIMA/SV 组(未匹配组的 10 年和 15 年生存率分别为 84%和 71%,而 LIMA/SV 组分别为 61%和 36%[P<0.001];匹配组的 10 年和 15 年生存率分别为 83%和 70%,而 LIMA/SV 组分别为 80%和 60%[P=0.0025])。双侧内乳动脉/隐静脉(n=589)和双侧内乳动脉(n=271)亚组的 MultArt 患者 15 年生存率改善(86%和 76%;10 年和 15 年时的 82%和 75%[P<0.001]),双侧内乳动脉/桡动脉(n=147)和 LIMA/桡动脉(n=169)患者的 10 年生存率高于 LIMA/SV(84%和 78%;P<0.001)。多变量分析显示,MultArt 移植物仍然是生存率的独立强预测因素(风险比,0.79;95%置信区间,0.66-0.94;P=0.007)。

结论

在接受 LIMA 至前降支冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者中,与隐静脉相比,非前降支血管的动脉移植物在 15 年时具有生存优势。这些结果是否适用于风险较高的患者亚组仍未得到证实。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验