Haji Saeed Shkar R
Branch of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Sulaimani, IRQ.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Sulaimani Cardiac Hospital, Sulaimani, IRQ.
Cureus. 2024 Aug 2;16(8):e66009. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66009. eCollection 2024 Aug.
The global recognition of multiple arterial grafting (MAG) and total arterial grafting (TAG) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is increasing. However, many centers have not yet adopted these procedures. Our study aims to examine the intraoperative, early postoperative, and two-year follow-up outcomes associated with MAG and TAG in candidates for CABG. The goal is to provide valuable insights into the role of these procedures.
A prospective comparative study was conducted at Sulaimani Cardiac Hospital to analyze a cohort of 300 patients who underwent CABG surgery between January 2021 and April 2022. Convenience sampling was used to select participants. Prior to surgery, patients underwent comprehensive pre-operative evaluations, with certain CABG types being excluded. The patients were then categorized into three groups based on their surgical approach: single arterial conduit (SA), two arterial conduits (MA), and total arterial revascularization (TA). The standard bypass procedure was performed for all patients, and they were monitored for 30 days, six months, and two years after the surgery. A range of variables, including bypass and cross-clamp times, as well as postoperative complications such as bleeding and stroke, were recorded and analyzed. Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS, version 25; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) was used for this analysis, with a predetermined significance threshold of p ≤ 0.05.
The study included 300 participants who underwent CABG. The participants had an average age of 61.19 ± 4.67 years (95% CI: 36-81) and an average BMI of 27.40 ± 8.4 kg/m² (95% CI: 18-45). Diabetes was present in 40.3% of the patients, and the majority of the participants were male (77.7%). The number of vessels involved in the bypass varied, with two vessels in 21% of cases, three vessels in 65%, and four vessels in 14%. The left internal thoracic artery (LITA) was primarily used for arterial revascularization, and additional arterial conduits were used in 30.3% of cases. Statistical analysis showed significant differences in the number of grafts among patient groups (P = 0.042). However, there were no significant differences in bypass duration, cross-clamp duration, stroke incidence, or in-hospital mortality rates among the groups (P > 0.05). The rates of myocardial infarction (MI) approached significance (P = 0.05), and the mortality rates were comparable over a two-year period after CABG (4.7%) and at shorter intervals. These findings highlight the importance of age and the number of grafts in determining outcomes in CABG patients.
In a developing nation, the lack of a specialized center for MAG does not hinder the implementation of MAG or TAG. The overall occurrence of complications after CABG is similar across all groups, except for MI. Patients who undergo MAG have higher rates of overall survival compared to those who receive SA and TAG.
冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)中多动脉移植(MAG)和全动脉移植(TAG)在全球范围内的认可度正在提高。然而,许多中心尚未采用这些手术方法。我们的研究旨在检查CABG候选患者中与MAG和TAG相关的术中、术后早期及两年随访结果。目的是为这些手术方法的作用提供有价值的见解。
在苏莱曼尼心脏医院进行了一项前瞻性比较研究,以分析2021年1月至2022年4月期间接受CABG手术的300例患者。采用便利抽样法选择参与者。手术前,患者接受全面的术前评估,某些CABG类型被排除。然后根据手术方式将患者分为三组:单动脉管道(SA)、双动脉管道(MA)和全动脉血运重建(TA)。所有患者均接受标准旁路手术,并在术后30天、6个月和2年进行监测。记录并分析了一系列变量,包括旁路和交叉钳夹时间,以及术后并发症如出血和中风。使用统计产品与服务解决方案(SPSS,版本25;IBM公司,纽约州阿蒙克)进行此分析,预定显著性阈值为p≤0.05。
该研究纳入了300例接受CABG的参与者。参与者的平均年龄为61.19±4.67岁(95%置信区间:36 - 81岁),平均BMI为27.40±8.4 kg/m²(95%置信区间:18 - 45)。40.3%的患者患有糖尿病,大多数参与者为男性(77.7%)。旁路涉及的血管数量各不相同,21%的病例涉及两支血管,65%涉及三支血管,14%涉及四支血管。左内乳动脉(LITA)主要用于动脉血运重建,30.3%的病例使用了额外的动脉管道。统计分析显示患者组间移植数量存在显著差异(P = 0.042)。然而,各组间旁路持续时间、交叉钳夹持续时间、中风发生率或住院死亡率无显著差异(P > 0.05)。心肌梗死(MI)发生率接近显著性(P = 0.05),CABG术后两年(4.7%)及较短时间间隔内的死亡率相当。这些发现突出了年龄和移植数量在决定CABG患者预后中的重要性。
在一个发展中国家,缺乏MAG专业中心并不妨碍MAG或TAG的实施。除MI外,CABG后所有组并发症的总体发生率相似。与接受SA和TAG的患者相比,接受MAG的患者总体生存率更高。