Wang Helena X, Heeger David J, Landy Michael S
Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003, United States.
Vision Res. 2012 Jun 1;62:192-200. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.03.008.
First-order (contrast) surround suppression has been well characterized both psychophysically and physiologically,but relatively little is known as to whether the perception of second-order visual stimuli exhibits analogous center–surround interactions. Second-order surround suppression was characterized by requiring subjects to detect second-order modulation in stimuli presented alone or embedded in a surround.Both contrast- (CM) and orientation-modulated (OM) stimuli were used. For most subjects and both OM and CM stimuli, second-order surrounds caused thresholds to be higher, indicative of second-order suppression. For CM stimuli, suppression was orientation-specific, i.e., higher thresholds for parallel than for orthogonal surrounds. However, the evidence for orientation specificity of suppression for OM stimuli was weaker. These results suggest that normalization, leading to surround suppression, operates at multiple stages in cortical processing.
一阶(对比度)外周抑制在心理物理学和生理学方面都得到了充分的表征,但对于二阶视觉刺激的感知是否表现出类似的中心-外周相互作用,人们了解得相对较少。二阶外周抑制的特征是要求受试者检测单独呈现或嵌入外周中的刺激的二阶调制。使用了对比度调制(CM)和方向调制(OM)刺激。对于大多数受试者以及OM和CM刺激,二阶外周都会导致阈值升高,这表明存在二阶抑制。对于CM刺激,抑制是方向特异性的,即平行外周的阈值高于正交外周。然而,OM刺激抑制的方向特异性证据较弱。这些结果表明,导致外周抑制的归一化在皮层处理的多个阶段起作用。