Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS Med. 2012;9(7):e1001268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001268. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
The role of public reporting in improving hospital quality of care is controversial. Reporting of hospital-acquired infection rates has been introduced in multiple health care systems, but its relationship to infection rates has been understudied. Our objective was to determine whether mandatory public reporting by hospitals is associated with a reduction in hospital rates of Clostridium difficile infection.
We conducted a longitudinal, population-based cohort study in Ontario (Canada's largest province) between April 1, 2002, and March 31, 2010. We included all patients (>1 y old) admitted to 180 acute care hospitals. Using Poisson regression, we developed a model to predict hospital- and age-specific monthly rates of C. difficile disease per 10,000 patient-days prior to introduction of public reporting on September 1, 2008. We then compared observed monthly rates of C. difficile infection in the post-intervention period with rates predicted by the pre-intervention predictive model. In the pre-intervention period there were 33,634 cases of C. difficile infection during 39,221,113 hospital days, with rates increasing from 7.01 per 10,000 patient-days in 2002 to 10.79 in 2007. In the first calendar year after the introduction of public reporting, there was a decline in observed rates of C. difficile colitis in Ontario to 8.92 cases per 10,000 patient-days, which was significantly lower than the predicted rate of 12.16 (95% CI 11.35-13.04) cases per 10,000 patient-days (p<0.001). Over this period, public reporting was associated with a 26.7% (95% CI 21.4%-31.6%) reduction in C. difficile cases, or a projected 1,970 cases averted per year (95% CI 1,476-2,500). The effect was specific to C. difficile, with rates of community-acquired gastrointestinal infections and urinary tract infections unchanged. A limitation of our study is that this observational study design cannot rule out the influence of unmeasured temporal confounders.
Public reporting of hospital C. difficile rates was associated with a substantial reduction in the population burden of this infection. Future research will be required to discern the direct mechanism by which C. difficile infection rates may have been reduced in response to public reporting. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
公众报告在提高医院护理质量方面的作用存在争议。在多个医疗保健系统中已经引入了医院获得性感染率的报告,但对其与感染率的关系研究甚少。我们的目的是确定医院强制性的公开报告是否与艰难梭菌感染率的降低有关。
我们在安大略省(加拿大最大的省份)进行了一项纵向、基于人群的队列研究,时间跨度为 2002 年 4 月 1 日至 2010 年 3 月 31 日。我们纳入了所有(年龄大于 1 岁)入住 180 家急性护理医院的患者。我们使用泊松回归,在 2008 年 9 月 1 日引入公共报告之前,建立了一个模型,以预测每 10000 个患者天的医院和年龄特定的艰难梭菌疾病每月发生率。然后,我们将干预后期间的实际每月艰难梭菌感染率与干预前预测模型预测的发生率进行了比较。在干预前期间,有 33634 例艰难梭菌感染,发生在 3922113 个住院日中,发病率从 2002 年的 7.01/10000 患者天上升到 2007 年的 10.79/10000 患者天。在引入公共报告后的第一个日历年内,安大略省艰难梭菌结肠炎的观察到的发生率下降到 8.92/10000 患者天,明显低于预测的 12.16(95%CI 11.35-13.04)/10000 患者天的发生率(p<0.001)。在此期间,艰难梭菌病例减少了 26.7%(95%CI 21.4%-31.6%),每年预计可避免 1970 例病例(95%CI 1476-2500)。这种效果是艰难梭菌特有的,社区获得性胃肠道感染和尿路感染的发病率没有变化。我们研究的一个限制是,这种观察性研究设计不能排除未测量的时间混杂因素的影响。
艰难梭菌医院报告率的公开报告与该感染人群负担的大幅降低有关。未来的研究将需要确定艰难梭菌感染率可能因公共报告而降低的直接机制。请在文章后面查看编辑摘要。