• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性前肩关节脱位的闭合复位技术:改良 Milch 技术与牵引对抗复位技术比较。

Closed reduction techniques in acute anterior shoulder dislocation: modified Milch technique compared with traction-countertraction technique.

机构信息

Orthopaedic Department, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Dec;21(12):1706-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.04.004. Epub 2012 Jul 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2012.04.004
PMID:22819577
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To perform closed manual reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocation using the traction-countertraction technique requires sedation (TCTS) and the participation of 2 people. We studied the modified Milch (MM) technique, a positional reductive maneuver that requires 1 operator, without patient sedation or analgesia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study comprised 56 prospective nonrandomized consecutive patients, of whom 31 were in group A (MM, nonsedated) and 25 in group B (TCTS).

RESULTS

The success rate of MM technique was 83.9% (26 of 31), which increased to 96.3% (26 of 27) when 4 patients with associated greater tuberosity fractures were excluded. The success rate was 100% in the TCTS group, with 5 patients with associated greater tuberosity fractures. The reduction in pain from the preprocedural to intraprocedural phases in MM group was significant (P < .001), at a reduction rate of 2.07 (29%) on the numeric rating scale pain score. There was a greater pain reduction rate of 2.43 (34%) on the numeric rating scale when patients with greater tuberosity fractures were excluded. The MM group had a significantly shorter hospital stay (mean, 35 minutes) than the TCTS group (mean, 4 hours). No postreduction neurovascular or fracture complications occurred in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed that the Milch technique was effective, safe, shortened hospital stay, and was well tolerated. We recommend the modified Milch technique as a first-line maneuver for acute anterior shoulder dislocations without associated fractures.

摘要

背景

采用牵引对抗技术(TCTS)对急性前肩脱位进行闭合手动复位需要镇静(TCTS),并且需要 2 人参与。我们研究了改良米尔希(MM)技术,这是一种位置复位操作,只需要 1 名操作员,不需要患者镇静或镇痛。

材料和方法

该研究包括 56 例前瞻性非随机连续患者,其中 31 例为 A 组(MM,未镇静),25 例为 B 组(TCTS)。

结果

MM 技术的成功率为 83.9%(31 例中的 26 例),当排除 4 例伴有大结节骨折的患者后,成功率增加至 96.3%(26 例中的 27 例)。TCTS 组的成功率为 100%,其中 5 例伴有大结节骨折。MM 组患者从术前到术中的疼痛减轻程度显著(P<0.001),数字评分量表疼痛评分降低 2.07(29%)。当排除大结节骨折的患者时,疼痛减轻程度更大,为 2.43(34%)。MM 组的住院时间明显短于 TCTS 组(平均 35 分钟比 4 小时)。两组均未发生复位后神经血管或骨折并发症。

结论

结果表明,米尔希技术有效、安全、缩短了住院时间,且患者耐受性良好。我们建议将改良米尔希技术作为无伴发骨折的急性前肩脱位的一线操作方法。

相似文献

1
Closed reduction techniques in acute anterior shoulder dislocation: modified Milch technique compared with traction-countertraction technique.急性前肩关节脱位的闭合复位技术:改良 Milch 技术与牵引对抗复位技术比较。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Dec;21(12):1706-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.04.004. Epub 2012 Jul 21.
2
Efficacy of gentle traction, abduction and external rotation maneuver under sedative-free for reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocation: retrospective comparative study.无镇静下轻柔牵引、外展及外旋手法复位急性前肩关节脱位的疗效:回顾性对比研究
J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Dec;94(12):1482-6.
3
Painless reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocations without anesthesia.急性前肩关节脱位无麻醉下的无痛复位
Orthopedics. 2006 Jun;29(6):528-32. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20060601-09.
4
Milch versus Stimson technique for nonsedated reduction of anterior shoulder dislocation: a prospective randomized trial and analysis of factors affecting success.Milch 与 Stimson 技术在非镇静下复位肩关节前脱位的前瞻性随机试验:影响复位成功因素的分析。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Nov;21(11):1443-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.01.004. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
5
Reduction of anterior glenohumeral dislocations: a new closed reduction technique.肩肱关节前脱位的复位:一种新的闭合复位技术。
Phys Sportsmed. 2017 Feb;45(1):22-25. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2017.1272400. Epub 2016 Dec 25.
6
Reduction of acute anterior dislocations: a prospective randomized study comparing a new technique with the Hippocratic and Kocher methods.急性前脱位的复位:一项将新技术与希波克拉底法和科赫尔法进行比较的前瞻性随机研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Dec;91(12):2775-82. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01434.
7
Efficacy of the assisted self-reduction technique for acute anterior shoulder dislocation.急性前肩关节脱位辅助自我复位技术的疗效
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Dec;134(12):1761-5. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-2109-2. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
8
The Milch technique for reduction of anterior shoulder dislocations in an accident and emergency department.在急诊科用于复位肩关节前脱位的米尔奇技术。
Arch Emerg Med. 1992 Mar;9(1):40-3. doi: 10.1136/emj.9.1.40.
9
A prospective randomised clinical trial comparing FARES method with the Eachempati external rotation method for reduction of acute anterior dislocation of shoulder.前瞻性随机临床试验比较 FARES 法与 Eachempati 外旋法治疗急性肩关节前脱位。
Injury. 2012 Jul;43(7):1066-70. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.01.019. Epub 2012 Feb 12.
10
Reduction of anterior shoulder dislocations by Spaso technique: clinical results.采用斯帕索技术复位肩关节前脱位:临床结果
J Emerg Med. 2008 May;34(4):383-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.07.026. Epub 2008 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
An Easy New Method for Reducing Anterior Shoulder Dislocations: The Lateral Position Technique.一种减少肩关节前脱位的简易新方法:侧卧位技术。
Cureus. 2025 Jul 26;17(7):e88803. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88803. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
An original closed reduction technique for acute shoulder dislocation: the wrist-clamping and shoulder-lifting.一种用于急性肩关节脱位的原始闭合复位技术:夹腕提肩法。
Int J Emerg Med. 2025 Mar 26;18(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12245-025-00866-8.
3
Effects of reduction technique for acute anterior shoulder dislocation without sedation or intra-articular pain management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
无镇静或关节内疼痛管理的急性前肩脱位复位技术的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Jun;49(3):1383-1392. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02242-8. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
4
Which is the most appropriate anterior glenohumeral dislocation reduction technique among three different techniques? A prospective, randomized clinical trial.哪种前肩盂脱位复位技术最适合?一项前瞻性、随机临床试验。
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2023;34(1):144-150. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2023.879. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
5
Evaluation of the Davos self-assisted technique for reduction of anterior glenohumeral dislocations: a comparative study with the traction/countertraction technique.评估达沃斯自助技术治疗前肩肱关节脱位的复位效果:与牵引/对抗牵引技术的对比研究。
JSES Int. 2022 Jan 17;6(3):391-395. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.11.020. eCollection 2022 May.
6
Closed shoulder reduction by glenohumeral joint distraction. A technical note.经盂肱关节分离术闭合性肩部复位。技术说明。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 May;33(4):1427-1429. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03222-1. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
7
No Sedation, No Traction, and No Need for Assistance: Analysis of New Prakash's Method of Shoulder Reduction.无需镇静、无需牵引且无需协助:新型普拉卡什肩关节复位法分析
Emerg Med Int. 2020 Jan 4;2020:4379016. doi: 10.1155/2020/4379016. eCollection 2020.
8
Biomechanical reposition techniques in anterior shoulder dislocation: a randomised multicentre clinical trial- the BRASD-trial protocol.前肩脱位的生物力学复位技术:一项随机多中心临床试验——BRASD试验方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 20;7(7):e013676. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013676.
9
A systematic and technical guide on how to reduce a shoulder dislocation.关于如何复位肩关节脱位的系统技术指南。
Turk J Emerg Med. 2016 Nov 18;16(4):155-168. doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2016.09.008. eCollection 2016 Dec.