School of Psychology, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2012 Aug;32(6):558-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.06.005. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
Research in eating disorders is reviewed examining the (1) utility of the Transtheoretical Model in predicting outcome, and (2) efficacy of Motivational Interviewing (MI). There were promising results showing significant relationships between initial stage of change and treatment outcome related to eating pathology (not including purging), body mass index, and some aspects of psychopathology. Of those treatment studies utilising a control group, there was little indication that using MI conferred significant treatment benefit, with the exception of improving motivation and binge eating for people with binge eating disorder and bulimia nervosa. Overall the content of the studies varied greatly with relation to: stage of change and outcome measures, format of MI, diagnostic groupings, age of participants, utilisation of other adjunctive treatments, sample size, presence of follow-up assessments, and study design. Few of the 9 studies examining the efficacy of MI could be considered to have robust methodology. It is recommended that future research using the Transtheoretical Model to predict outcome adopt more uniform methodology so that we can more specifically determine its applicability, and that well-designed treatment studies in eating disorder populations be conducted so that we develop a stronger evidence base from which to decide whether MI confers benefit.
研究饮食失调症,考察(1)跨理论模型在预测结果方面的效用,以及(2)动机访谈(MI)的功效。有一些有希望的结果表明,在与饮食病理学(不包括催吐)、体重指数和某些心理病理学方面相关的治疗结果方面,初始改变阶段与治疗结果之间存在显著关系。在那些使用对照组的治疗研究中,几乎没有迹象表明使用 MI 会带来显著的治疗益处,除了改善暴食障碍和神经性贪食症患者的动机和暴食行为。总的来说,这些研究的内容在以下方面存在很大差异:改变阶段和结果测量、MI 的格式、诊断分组、参与者的年龄、其他辅助治疗的使用、样本量、随访评估的存在以及研究设计。在 9 项研究中,只有少数研究可以被认为具有稳健的方法学。建议未来使用跨理论模型预测结果的研究采用更加统一的方法,以便我们更具体地确定其适用性,并且在饮食障碍人群中进行精心设计的治疗研究,以便我们从更强的证据基础中决定 MI 是否有益。